Abstract
Background and Aims The ‘gateway’ hypothesis proposes that initial use of drugs such as tobacco and alcohol can lead to subsequent more problematic drug use. However, it is unclear whether true casual pathways exist, or whether there is instead a shared underlying risk factor. We used bidirectional Mendelian Randomisation (MR) to test these two competing hypotheses.
Methods We conducted two-sample MR analyses, using genome-wide association data for smoking initiation, alcoholic drinks per week, cannabis use and dependence, cocaine and opioid dependence. We used several MR methods that rely on different assumptions: inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode and weighted mode. Consistent results across these methods would support stronger inference.
Results We found evidence of causal effects from smoking initiation to increased drinks per week (IVW: β=0.06; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.09; p-value=9.44×10-06), cannabis use (IVW: OR=1.34; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.44; p-value=1.95×10-14), and cannabis dependence (IVW: OR=1.68; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.51; p-value=0.01). We also found evidence of an effect of cannabis use on increased likelihood of smoking initiation (IVW: OR=1.39; 95% CI=1.08 to 1.80; p-value=0.01). We did not find evidence of an effect of drinks per week on substance use outcomes, except for weak evidence of an effect on cannabis use. We also found evidence of an effect of opioid dependence on increased drinks per week (IVW: β=0.002; 95% CI=0.0005 to 0.003; p-value=8.61×10-03).
Conclusions Overall, we found evidence suggesting a causal pathway from smoking initiation to alcohol consumption, and both cannabis use and dependence, which may support the gateway hypothesis. However, we also found causal effects of cannabis use on smoking initiation, and opioid dependence on alcohol consumption, which suggests the existence of a shared risk factor. Further research should explore whether this is the case, and in particular the nature of any shared risk factors.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported in part by Public Health England, the UK Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol (Grant ref: MC_UU_00011/7), and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health. Robyn Wootton was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the South-Eastern Regional Health Authority (2020024).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
NA
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declarations of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos