Abstract
Objective It was the aim to assess feasibility, safety and potential efficacy of a new intensive, focused arm-hand BOOST program and to investigate whether there is a difference between early versus late delivery of the program in the sub-acute phase post stroke.
Methods In this pilot RCT, patients with stroke were randomized to the immediate group (IG): 4 weeks (4w) BOOST +4w CONTROL or the delayed group (DG): 4w CONTROL +4w BOOST, on top of their usual inpatient care program. The focused arm-hand BOOST program (1 hour/day, 5x/week, 4 weeks) consisted of group exercises with focus on scapula-setting, core-stability, manipulation and complex ADL tasks. Additionally, one hour per week the Armeo®Power (Hocoma AG, Switzerland) was used. The CONTROL intervention comprised a dose-matched program (24 one-hour sessions in 4w) of lower limb strengthening exercises and general reconditioning. At baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of training, the Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity (FMA-UE), action research arm test (ARAT) and stroke upper limb capacity scale (SULCS) were administered.
Results Eighteen participants (IG: n=10, DG: n=8) were included, with a median (IQR) time post stroke of 8.6 weeks (5-12). No adverse events were experienced. After 4 weeks of training, significant between-group differences were found for FMA-UE (p=0.003) and SULCS (p=0.033) and a trend for ARAT (p=0.075) with median (IQR) change scores for the IG of 9 (7-16), 2 (1-3) and 12.5 (1-18) respectively, and for the DG of 0.5 (−3-3), 1 (0-1) and 1.5 (−1-9), respectively. In the IG, 80% of patients improved beyond the minimal clinical important difference of FMA-UE after 4 weeks, compared to none of the DG patients. Between 4 and 8 weeks of training, patients in the DG tend to show larger improvements when compared to the IG, however, between-group comparisons did not reach significance.
Conclusions Results of this pilot RCT showed that an intensive, specific arm-hand BOOST program, on top of usual care, is feasible and safe in the sub-acute phase post stroke and suggests positive, clinical meaningful effects on upper limb function, especially when delivered in the early sub-acute phase post stroke.
Clinical Trial Registration www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04584177
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT04584177
Funding Statement
This research was not funded by a grant.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the ethical review committee of Jessa Hospital on April 2nd 2019 (Number 19.27/Reva19.01, Belgian registration number B243201939920, Chairperson: Dr. Magerman)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data associated with the paper are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
