Abstract
Background An intensive lifestyle modification program or metformin pharmacotherapy reduced the risk of developing diabetes in patients at high risk, but are not widely used in the 88 million American adults with prediabetes.
Objective Develop an electronic health record (EHR)-based risk tool that provides point-of-care estimates of diabetes risk to support targeting interventions to patients most likely to benefit.
Design Cross-design synthesis: risk prediction model developed and validated in large observational database, treatment effect estimates from risk-based reanalysis of clinical trial data.
Setting Outpatient clinics in US.
Patients Risk model development cohort: 1.1 million patients with prediabetes from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW); validation cohort: distinct sample of 1.1 million patients in OLDW. Randomized clinical trial cohort: 3081 people from the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) study.
Interventions Randomization in the DPP: 1) an intensive program of lifestyle modification; 2) standard lifestyle recommendations plus 850 mg metformin twice daily; or 3) standard lifestyle recommendations plus placebo twice daily.
Results Eleven variables reliably obtainable from the EHR were used to predict diabetes risk. This model validated well in the OLDW (c-statistic = 0.76; observed 3-year diabetes rate was 1.8% in lowest-risk quarter and 19.6% in highest-risk quarter). In the DPP, the hazard ratio for lifestyle modification was constant across all levels of risk (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.35 – 0.53); while the HR for metformin was highly risk-dependent (HR HR = 1.1 [95% CI: 0.61 - 2.0] in the lowest-risk quarter vs. HR=0.45 [95% CI: 0.35 0.59] in the highest risk quarter). Fifty-three percent of the benefits of population-wide dissemination of the DPP lifestyle modification, and 76% of the benefits of population-wide metformin therapy can be obtained targeting the highest risk quarter of patients.
Limitations Differences in variable definitions and in missingness across observational and trial settings may introduce estimation error in risk-based treatment effects.
Conclusion An EHR-compatible risk model might support targeted diabetes prevention to more efficiently realize the benefits of the DPP interventions.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: all authors had financial support from Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) contract (DI-1604-35234) for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) grant (DI-1604-35234). The funder had no role in the conduct of this research or the decision to publish the results.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was reviewed and approved by the Tufts Health Sciences Institutional Review Board prior to accessing the deidentified data from the DPP and OLDW datasets.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from OptumLabs but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of OptumLabs.
