ABSTRACT
Geographically stratified estimates of disease burden play an important role in setting priorities for the management of different diseases and for targeting interventions against a single disease. Such estimates involve numerous assumptions, which uncertainty about is not always well accounted for. We developed a framework for estimating the burden of yellow fever in Africa and evaluated its sensitivity to assumptions about the interpretation of serological data and choice of regression model. We addressed the latter with an ensemble approach, and we found that the former resulted in a nearly twentyfold difference in burden estimates (range of central estimates: 8.4×104-1.5×106 deaths in 2021-2030). Even so, statistical uncertainty made even greater contributions to variance in burden estimates (87%). Combined with estimates that most infections go unreported (range of 95% credible intervals: 99.65-99.99%), our results suggest that yellow fever’s burden will remain highly uncertain without major improvements in surveillance.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was carried out as part of the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium, which is funded by Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1157270). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Consortium or its funders. The final decision on the content of the publication was taken by the authors. JHH received support from a Graduate Research Fellowship from the National Science Foundation and a Richard and Peggy Notebaert Premier Fellowship from the University of Notre Dame. RJO received support from an Arthur J. Schmitt Leadership Fellowship in Science and Engineering and an Eck Institute for Global Health Fellowship from the University of Notre Dame. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos