Post operative acute kidney injury in abdominal Surgeries – A retrospective analysis of single center in western India

Background

Post Operative Acute kidney injury is one of the very common post-operative complications [1]. Many studies have shown that postoperative acute kidney injury is associated with other morbidities and mortalities. [2,3,4,5].

Very few studies have evaluated the risk of acute kidney injury in abdominal surgeries in the Indian population.

Material and Methods

Results

We performed 402 gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary surgery from April 2018 to December 2020. After applying exclusion criteria 372 patients were included in the study. 26 patients had preoperative acute kidney injury, 4 patients were on dialysis and one patient died on postoperative day 0 and hence excluded from the study. Various type of abdominal surgeries performed is described in table 1.

20 patients (5.3%) were defined as having acute kidney injury according to acute kidney injury network classifications. [6,7]. [Figure 1]

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

RIFLE and AKIN classifications for acute kidney injury. Risk–Injury– Failure–Loss–End stage renal disease (RIFLE) and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) classifications for acute kidney injury (adapted from [6,10]).

On univariate analysis acute kidney injury was associated with open surgery (p= 0.003), Intra operative hypotension (p < 0.001), CDC grade of surgery (p<0.0001) [8], Colorectal Surgeries (p< 0.001), emergency surgeries (p=0.028), increased used of blood products (p=0.001),higher ASA grade (p<0.0001), increased operative time (p<0.0001). [Table 2]

On multivariate logistic regression analysis higher ASA grade (p=0.001, odds ratio 15.05, 95% confidence interval 4.05-56.20) and increased operative time (p=0.049, odds ratio 1.005, 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.015) independently predicted acute kidney injury. [Table 3]

Acute kidney injury was also significantly associated with 90 days mortality. (p= <0.0001)

On Kaplan Meier, survival analysis patients with acute kidney injury had significantly less 90 days survival than patients without acute kidney injury. [Figure 2].

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2.

Kaplan meier survival analysis showed 90 days survival was sginificantly less in patient who developed acute kidney injury. (p < 0.0001, log rank analysis)

DISCUSSION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients undergoing major Gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary surgery. Various studies stated the incidence of AKI after major abdominal surgery may go up to 35%. Several patient-related, procedure-related factors for AKI. AKI was associated with increased incidence of morbidity and mortality in various studies. [8,9]

The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence and various factors associated with Acute kidney injury. Two criteria for diagnosing acute kidney injury are widely used one is RIFLE criteria and the other is Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. [6,10]. We used Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria to diagnose acute kidney injury network and we included all the grades of acute kidney injury network classification in our analysis. [Figure 2]

The overall incidence of acute kidney injury in our cohort was 5.3%. Cho et al. reported 7.6 percent acute kidney injury after HPB surgeries. [9] Meersch et al. reported a high incidence of acute kidney injury.

Acute kidney injury in our study was significantly associated with mortality. Literature also shows that acute kidney injury is associated with high mortality. [9,10,11,12,13].

On univariate analysis in our study open surgeries, intraoperative hypotension, higher ASA (American Society of anesthesiology) grade, higher CDC wound grade, increase blood product requirement, colorectal surgeries, emergency surgeries, and increased operative time were associated with the development of acute kidney injury. Hobson et al. studied various risk factors associated with perioperative risk factors and showed a previous history of chronic kidney disease and hemoglobin level was associated with postoperative acute kidney injury. [14] In our study increase, blood product required was associated with acute kidney injury. Lim et al. suggested that major hepatectomy, increase meld score, advanced age, and prolonged operative duration were associated with acute kidney injury.[15]

Various studies showed that intraoperative hypotension was associated with post-operative acute kidney injury.[16,17,18] In our study also intraoperative hypotension was associated with acute kidney injury in univariate analysis however it did not independently predict acute kidney injury on multivariate analysis.

In the multivariate analysis in our study higher American society of anesthesiology score (p< 0.001) and increased operative time (p=0.015) were associated with acute kidney injury Literature also supports these findings. [19,20]

In our study, acute kidney injury was associated with increased hospital stay which is also supported by the literature. [21,22]

Being a retrospective analysis, our study has inherent limitations associated with retrospective studies. The number of patients who developed acute kidney injury was low in our studies and that may be the cause of the wide confidence interval of odds ratios after multivariate analysis. The effect size of operative time in predicting acute kidney injury was very limited and that is why it was only marginally significant, higher sample size may change this finding. However, the ASA score was highly significant with a very high odds ratio in predicting acute kidney injury and we believe this finding may not change with increasing sample size. More studies with a higher number of patients are required to confirm our findings. Our earlier data with a limited number of patients (23) also showed Higher ASA scores and increased operative time predicted postoperative acute kidney injury but in that data, operative time was highly significantly associated (p=0.015) with postoperative acute kidney injury but in this updated data it is just borderline significant with p-value of 0.049 and lower limit of 95% confidence interval of odds ratio 1.0. ASA retained its very high significant level with p-value < 0.0001. This shows the importance of sample size and the need for studies with higher sample sizes and adequate power.

In conclusion, postoperative acute kidney injury was associated with significant mortality in gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary surgery. Higher ASA grades and increased operative time independently predicted acute kidney injury in our data.