Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the air from hospitals and closed rooms occupied by COVID-19 patients

Introduction

It is astonishing how a ∼100nm viral particle, SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2) has affected the human life in the most unexpected ways in just a few months [1]. The effects on the patient are seen to range from being totally asymptomatic to respiratory or multiorgan failure and the complications are also not just restricted to respiratory system [2]. In spite of the multiple measures taken by countries globally, containing the virus has been challenging. Initially, contact and droplet-mediated transmission were considered as major modes of transmission for the SARS-CoV-2. Accordingly, hand washing and social distancing were the main measures suggested along with wearing masks, to avoid contracting the disease. The alarmingly increasing number of cases of COVID-19 globally raised the possibility of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 [3]. The antecedent of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, which had an outbreak in 2002-2004, was reported to spread through air [4, 5] and through viral aerosols generated by patients [6]. Apart from SARS-CoV-1, other viruses - Norwalk like virus [7], respiratory syncytial virus [8], MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) coronavirus [9] and Influenza A/H591 virus between ferrets [10] were also reported to have the possibility of airborne transmission. Considering that these viruses, especially SARS-CoV-1 and MERS virus, which are closely related to SARS-CoV-2, were capable of getting transmitted through air, the possibility of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 cannot be ruled out [3, 11]. More so, when it has been observed that SARS-CoV-2 is quite stable in aerosols [12] and that it is more stable in aerosols when compared to SARS-CoV-1 and MERS [13].

There are existing reports of surface and environment contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in hospital rooms of COVID-19 positive patients [14-16]. A study by Lednicky et al. (2020) has provided evidence for the presence of viable SARS-CoV-2 in the air samples collected from hospital room with COVID-19 patient even in the absence of any aerosol generating procedure [17]. Rami et al. (2020) also suggested that, in hospitals, droplets containing SARS-CoV-2, with strong directional airflow, can spread the virus farther than 2 meters [18]. To get further insights on transmission characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 in air and to assess the risk for healthcare workers, we collected air samples from different locations of hospitals and from closed rooms in which either one or more COVID positive individuals were present during sampling.

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion

In the initial phases of the pandemic, the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was largely thought to be through contact and droplet spread. However, with studies reporting transmission among physically distanced individuals in closed spaces with air conditioning [18, 19] and the fact that, the viral spread could not be effectively curbed in spite of strict lockdowns in various countries of the world, raised the possibility of its airborne transmission. CDC also released a statement acknowledging the possibility of air borne transmission in certain scenarios (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/more/scientific-brief-sars-cov-2.html).

In our study, from the air samples collected in hospitals, virus could be detected from various COVID care areas with no specific predilection towards ICU/ non-ICU areas. The virus could not be detected in any of the non-COVID areas, providing objective evidence that the strategy of separating hospital premises into COVID and non-COVID care areas is effective. The positivity rate was found to be higher when the number of COVID patients were higher in the room, a finding concordant with results of closed room experiments as well. A point to be highlighted from the hospital experiments was that in 3/4 samples which were positive, the sampler was at least 10 feet away from the nearest patient. As there is no record on events that occurred in the sampling area before the sample collection began, we are unable to infer this finding. But this may be an indicator that long term presence of COVID positive patients in an enclosed space may contribute to a significant increase in aerosol burden in the air.

In our study, we found that the virus does not travel much in the air in neutral environmental conditions (ambient temperature and humidity with no perceived air flow), especially if duration of exposure is short. Virus could not be picked up at a distance of even 4 feet when COVID positive individuals spent a short time (20 minutes) in the room. This indicates that short duration of exposure to a COVID positive individual may not put one at a significantly increased risk. The samples collected at 8 feet and 12 feet subsequently were also negative. In experiment 4, where three people with mild symptoms, were in a room for at least an hour, virus could be detected at the same place immediately after their departure. A finding strengthening the logic that chances of finding the virus in air are more when more number of symptomatic people stay in a closed place for longer periods.

These findings have significant implications in the current situation, when many countries have relaxed the restrictions on public mobility and interactions, even when the number of COVID-19 cases are increasing steadily. In many densely populated nations where the recommended physical distancing norms may be difficult to implement in public/ office spaces, distancing as much as possible with usage of masks should be actively promoted. Whilst, any form of verbal communication from closed quarters without wearing masks should be prohibited.

The strict lockdowns implemented in countries like India have brought the economy to a standstill. We are in a phase of recovery and possibly cannot afford any other such economic disruptions. On one hand, a sense of disbelief/ disregard for the advocated preventive measures has actually set in the people of our country, as the cases continued to spike in spite of such strict lockdown. On the other hand, there is a large section of the population who have not returned back to their jobs due to the fear of contracting the disease. It is evident that the spread of the pandemic may be largely attributed to noncompliance of COVID-19 safety guidelines on the part of the people. A right amount of caution with courage backed up by sound scientific principles is the need of the hour. The findings of our study objectively reassure people that advocated preventive measures would largely be successful in preventing the infection and urge the governments to continue promoting the same. Short-term travel and resumption of economic activity can be safe if adequate measures are taken.

However, it is to be noted that many of the air samples from hospitals and closed room experiments showed PCR signal for one of the SARS-CoV-2 genes or had Ct values above the prescribed cut-off. The possibility that SARS-CoV-2 is actually present in these air samples cannot be ruled out completely considering the diluting effect due to diffusion of the virus in air and the fact only 1000 liters (1 cubic meter) of air was sampled each time. If we consider these results as an evidence for presences of traces of viral RNA but not as negatives or false positives, all the propositions made in the paper so far still hold true except that the virus could be detected in the air long after the patients had left the room. This interpretation along with the results suggesting the presence of virus at greater than 10 feet from the patients in the hospital samples, in fact are supportive of air borne transmission. Further experiments are required not only to affirm/ negate this line of thought but also to establish the infectivity of such positive air samples.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (IEC-83/2020).