ABSTRACT
Background Enhanced temporal summation (TS), measured through self-reported pain ratings, has been interpreted as indicative of central sensitisation in fibromyalgia. Greater TS in patients, however, has not been universally observed. It is also unclear whether increased pain report maintains beyond the TS period.
Methods In this study, we measured TS through continuously reported pain ratings. Fibromyalgia-diagnosed patients (n = 17) and matched pain-free controls (n = 13) rated painful transcutaneous electrical stimulation of various intensity levels in 18 one-minute-long blocks. Pain was rated on a 101-point visual analogue scale. The resulting continuous response was divided into TS (< 15s) and adaptation (15 – 60s) periods. Average pain values were extracted for each period alongside the timing of key events such as maximal pain ratings. The difference in temporal summation and adaptation measures between fibromyalgia and control participants was analysed using mixed-effects modelling.
Results The average pain ratings for TS and adaptation periods were not significantly associated with fibromyalgia diagnosis but were with stimulation intensity. The same was true for the magnitude of the maximal rating during TS and the slope leading to that peak rating. The presence of fibromyalgia, however, did predict the time of the maximal TS rating, as well as the value and the time of the maximal adaptation rating.
Conclusions Our study did not find homogeneously increased TS pain ratings. Instead, by utilising continuous pain data we demonstrate for the first time that the time of TS peak rating, as well as the magnitude and time of adaptation peak rating are linked to fibromyalgia diagnosis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Anna Kharko received funding from the School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, to carry out the study. The grant provider had no input into the conduct of the study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the School of Psychology Ethics Committee, University of Plymouth (17/18-890).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available upon request from the corresponding author.
