Abstract
Background There is a bidirectional relationship between blood pressure variability (BPV) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), but few studies have examined the gender- and age-specific effects of visit-to-visit BPV on GAD incidence. We examined the predictive value of BPV for the incidence of GAD in a family clinic cohort.
Methods Consecutive patients with a first attendance to family medicine clinics in Hong Kong between January 1st, 2000, and December 31st, 2002, with at least three blood pressure measurements available thereafter were included. The primary endpoint was incident GAD as identified by ICD-9 coding from the local Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System.
Results This study included 48023 (50% males) patients with a median follow-up of 224 (IQR: 217-229) months. Females were more likely to develop GAD compared to males (incidence rate: 7% vs. 2%), as were patients of older age. Significant univariate predictors were female gender, older age, pre-existing cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and gastrointestinal diseases, various laboratory examinations and the number of blood pressure measurements. Higher baseline, maximum, minimum, SD, CV, and variability score of diastolic blood pressure significantly predicted GAD, as did all systolic blood pressure measures (baseline, latest, maximum, minimum, mean, median, variance, SD, RMS, CV, variability score).
Conclusions The relationships between longer term visit-to-visit BPV and incident GAD were identified. Female and older patients with higher blood pressure and higher BPV were at the highest risks of GAD.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong - New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee and Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.