Abstract
Background While social assistance through the United States (U.S.) federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act provided expanded unemployment insurance benefits during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic until the summer of 2020, it is unclear whether subsequent social assistance has been or will be sufficient to meet everyday spending needs and to curb the adverse health-related sequelae of financial hardship.
Methods This study estimated recent trends in financial hardship among working-aged Americans with job-related income loss during the pandemic. It also used multivariable logistic regression and repeated cross-sectional individual-level U.S. Household Pulse Survey data on 91,222 working-aged adults between September and December 2020 to explore the associations of financial hardship with mental health outcomes and food and housing insecurity after accounting for receipt of social assistance.
Results Experiencing somewhat of a financial hardship (vs no hardship) was linked to 3-7 times higher odds of anxiety and depressive symptoms and a likely eviction, and 11 times higher odds of food insufficiency. Experiencing considerable financial hardship (vs no hardship) predicted 5-7 fold higher odds of anxiety and depressive symptoms, 34-fold higher odds of a likely housing eviction, and 37-fold higher odds of food insufficiency (all P values <.001). Across outcomes, these relationships were stronger at each successively higher level of financial hardship (all P values for linear trend <.001), and more than offset any corresponding benefits from social assistance.
Conclusions Even after accounting for receipt of social assistance, working-aged adults experiencing financial hardship had markedly greater odds of anxiety and depressive symptoms, food insufficiency, and an anticipated housing eviction. These findings point to the urgent need for direct and sustained cash relief well in excess of current levels of social assistance, and provide a critical baseline assessment for evaluating the impacts of federal public policy responses to economic hardships during the pandemic. It is essential that the U.S. Congress and the new Biden administration provide adequate and needs-based social policy relief measures in order to mitigate the pandemic’s adverse impacts on the physical, mental, and social well-being of millions of Americans.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Because all data lacked identifying information and were publicly available through the U.S. Census Bureau, this study was deemed exempt by the Human Subject Research Protection Committee at Northeastern University.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos