ABSTRACT
Objectives To investigate associations between occupational physical activity (OPA) and all-cause mortality.
Methods From baseline (2006-2010), 452,884 UK Biobank participants (aged 40-69 years) were followed for a median 11.1 (IQR: 10.4-11.8) years. OPA was categorised by cross-tabulating degree of manual work and walking/standing work amongst those in paid employment (n=264,424), whereas categories of occupational status were used for those not in paid employment (n=188,460). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality by occupational category, and for working hours/week and non-occupational physical activity stratified by occupational category.
Results During 4,965,616 person-years of follow-up, 23,310 deaths occurred. Compared to those in sedentary jobs, retirement was associated with lower mortality in women (HR=0.74, CI:0.68-0.81) and men (HR=0.85, CI:0.79-0.92), whereas unemployment was associated with higher mortality in men (HR=1.26, CI:1.10-1.45). There was no evidence of mortality differences by OPA category within the working population. Working <35 hours/week versus 35-40 hours/week was associated with lower mortality in both women (HR=0.86, CI:0.79-0.93) and men (HR=0.81, CI:0.75-0.88), with no interaction by OPA. Non-occupational physical activity was associated with lower mortality in both women (HR=0.90 per 5 kJ/day/kg, CI:0.84-0.96) and men (HR=0.88 per 5 kJ/day/kg, CI:0.84-0.92), with no interaction by OPA.
Conclusion Work classified as having higher levels of OPA may not be as active as reported, or the types of physical activity performed in those jobs are not health-enhancing. Irrespective of OPA category or employment status, non-occupational physical activity appears to provide health benefits.
What are the new findings?
Retirement was associated with lower all-cause mortality, compared to having a sedentary job in both men and women but unemployment was only associated with higher mortality in men.
There were no differences in mortality between categories with different levels of self-reported OPA
Physical activity outside of work was associated with lower hazard of all-cause mortality and there was no interaction with occupational physical activity, indicating similar benefits across different jobs types.
How might it impact on clinical practice in the future?
Health professionals should be aware that occupations assumed to involve more physical activity may not be as active as reported, or the types of physical activity performed in those jobs may not be health-enhancing.
Physical activity during leisure-time should continue to be recommended to adults of all paid and unpaid occupational categories.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
MP, TS, KW, AM, and SB acknowledge funding from the Medical Research Council (grants MC_UU_00006/4, MC_UU_12015/3, and MC_UU_12015/1) and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (IS_BRC-1215-20014). SJS acknowledges funding from MRC grant MC_UU_12015/1.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
UK Biobank was approved by the North West Multicentre Research Ethics Committee and all participants provided written informed consent.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos