Abstract
Background Youth’s mental health has on average declined initially during the pandemic and few studies have investigated whether these declines were dependent on housing conditions.
Methods We used data from 7445 youth from the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC), collected at participants’ 18th year of life and subsequently three weeks into the initial national lockdown (April 2020). We examined associations between housing conditions (access to outdoor spaces, urbanicity, household density, and household composition) and changes in mental health parameters (mental well-being, Quality of Life (QoL) and loneliness. We report results from multivariate linear and logistic regression models.
Findings Youth without access to outdoor spaces had a greater decrease in mental well-being compared to those with a garden, mean difference: -0·83 (95 % CI -1·19,-0·48), and correspondingly greater odds of onset of low mental well-being, OR: 1·68 (95 % CI 1·15, 2·47). Youth in higher density households and those living alone also had greater odds of onset of low mental well-being (OR: 1·23 (95 % CI 1·05, 1·43) and OR: 1·47 (95 % CI 1·05, 2·07), respectively). Onset of low QoL was associated with living in denser households, as well as living alone. Living alone more than doubled odds of onset of loneliness, OR: 2·12 (95 % CI 1·59, 2·82).
Interpretation Not all youth were equally affected by the pandemic and our findings inform policy makers that youth living alone, in denser households, and without direct access to outdoor spaces are especially vulnerable to mental health declines.
Evidence before this study Mental health is associated with certain housing characteristics, such as access to green space and household composition. Additionally, we know that mental health amongst youth has been especially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and/or social restrictions, at a time where a majority of youth spend more time at home. Cross-sectional studies have indicated that housing conditions during the initial lockdowns were associated with mental health among youth.
Added value to this study We are able to provide evidence that housing conditions have been important factors in how youth’s mental health has changed, due to data collections in our cohort before and during the pandemic. We demonstrate that living alone without access to outdoor spaces and in denser households during lockdown are all associated with deteriorations in mental health in a longitudinal design. The deteriorations in mental well-being are at a level indicative of anxiety and/or depression, indicating that these mental health changes are meaningful from a public health perspective. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine associations longitudinally in a youth cohort.
Implications of all the available evidence Not all youth will be equally affected by the pandemic and social restrictions. Public health recommendations could be that youth avoid living alone, in dense households and without access to outdoor spaces during a lockdown, if this is at all possible to choose. Additionally, mental health and public health professionals should be aware of these vulnerabilities as they seek to assist youth at times when social restrictions are in place to control community transmission. Additionally, as we look to the future and work towards equitable and health-promoting housing, we must consider aspects that are important to mental health during pandemics and otherwise.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was made possible by a grant from the RealDania Foundation (PRJ-2019-00020 'Indoor environment and child health') and by a grant from the Velux Foundation (grant number 36336, 'Standing together at a distance - how Danes are handling the corona crisis'). The funders of the study had no part in the conception or design of the study, or in the decision to publish.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency via a joint notification to the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences - University of Copenhagen (ref. 514-0497/20-3000, 'Standing together at a distance: how are Danish National Birth Cohort participants experiencing the corona crisis?'). The cohort is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Committee on Health Research Ethics under case no. (KF) 01-471/94. Data handling in the DNBC has been approved by Statens Serum Institut (SSI) under ref. no 18/04608 and is covered by the general approval (Faellesanmeldelse) given to SSI. The 18 year follow-up was approved under ref. no 2015-41-3961. The DNBC participants were enrolled by informed consent.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Co-author e-mails: ACK, amelie.keller{at}sund.ku.dk; AJ, anjo{at}sund.ku.dk; TLN, long{at}sund.ku.dk; AMNA, amny{at}sund.ku.dk; KSL, ksla{at}sund.ku.dk
Author contributions: JG, ACK, TLN, AMNA and KSL were involved in the conceptualization of the study, methodology, and the formal analyses. JG was primarily responsible for the formal analyses, methodology, drafting of the original manuscript, writing/editing the manuscript and data visualization. AJ was involved in data visualization. AMNA and KSL were responsible for funding acquisition and supervision. JG, ACK, AJ, AMNA and KSL were involved in the data curation. JG, ACK, TLN, AMNA and KSL contributed to the methodology and all authors contributed to writing/editing the manuscript. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted. JG is the guarantor of the manuscript and was primarily responsible for the formal analyses, data curation, methodology, drafting of the original manuscript, writing/editing the manuscript and data visualization. ACK has additionally verified the underlying dataset.
Conflicts of interest: None to declare.
Funding: This study was made possible by a grant from the RealDania Foundation (PRJ- 2019-00020 ‘Indoor environment and child health’) and by a grant from the Velux Foundation (grant number 36336, ‘Standing together at a distance – how Danes are handling the corona crisis’). The funders of the study had no part in the conception or design of the study, or in the decision to publish.
Ethics: This study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency via a joint notification to the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences - University of Copenhagen (ref. 514-0497/20-3000, ‘Standing together at a distance: how are Danish National Birth Cohort participants experiencing the corona crisis?’). The cohort is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Committee on Health Research Ethics under case no. (KF) 01- 471/94. Data handling in the DNBC has been approved by Statens Serum Institut (SSI) under ref. no 18/04608 and is covered by the general approval (Fællesanmeldelse) given to SSI. The 18 year follow-up was approved under ref. no 2015-41-3961. The DNBC participants were enrolled by informed consent.
Data Availability
N/A
