Abstract
Objective Identifying geographic-level prevalence of occupations associated with mobility during local stay-at-home pandemic mandate.
Methods A spatio-temporal ecological framework was applied to determine census-tracts that had significantly higher rates of occupations likely to be deemed essential: food-service, business and finance, healthcare support, and maintenance. Real-time mobility data was used to determine the average daily percent of residents not leaving their place of residence. Spatial regression models were constructed for each occupation proportion among census-tracts within a large urban area.
Results After adjusting for demographics, results indicate census-tracts with higher proportion of food-service workers, healthcare support employees, and office administration staff are likely to have increased mobility.
Conclusions Increased mobility among communities is likely to exacerbate COVID-19 mitigation efforts. This increase in mobility was also found associated with specific demographics suggesting it may be occurring among underserved and vulnerable populations. We find that prevalence of essential employment presents itself as a candidate for driving inequity in morbidity and mortality of COVID-19.
Three-question Summary
Employees and workers deemed essential during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to endure additional risk of infection due to community exposure. While preliminary reports are still quantifying this risk, we set out to examine if prevalence of specific occupations could be used to evaluate overall community-level risk based on stay-at-home mandate adherence.
Study results suggest that that not only are certain occupation geo-spatially associated with movement outside the home but are also associated with demographic characteristics likely to contribute to inequity of COVID-19 morbidity.
Often, nuanced inequities are lost in the larger data samples, being able to identify possible inequities from other sources such as prevalence of occupation among communities, remains an important and applicable alternative.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
n/a
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This secondary data analysis was submitted to Saint Louis University IRB for ethical oversight and is considered exempt. All methods and procedures within the study adhere to ethical guidelines described by the 1983 Helsinki Declaration. Access to data was granted as part of a national COVID-19 Research and Data Consortium (https://www.safegraph.com/covid-19-data-consortium) for which registration is required.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos