Abstract
Background In the ongoing pandemic situation of COVID-19, serological tests can complement the molecular diagnostic methods, and can be one of the important tools of sero-surveillance and vaccine evaluation.
Aim To develop and evaluate a rapid SARS-CoV-2 specific ELISA for detection of anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG from patient’s biological samples.
Methods In order to develop the ELISA, three panels of samples (n=184) have been used: panel 1 (n=19) and panel 2 (n=60) were collected from RT-PCR positive patients within 14 and after 14 days of onset of clinical symptoms respectively, whereas panel 3 consisted of negative samples (n=105) collected either from healthy donors or pre-pandemic dengue patients. As a capturing agent full-length SARS-CoV2 specific recombinant nucleocapsid was immobilized. Commercial SARS-CoV2 IgG kit based on chemiluminescent assay was used for the selection of samples and optimization of the assay. The threshold cut-off point, inter-assay and intra-assay variations were determined. The total assay time for this in-house ELISA was set for 30 minutes.
Results The assay time was set at a total of 30 minutes with the sensitivity of 84% (95% confidence interval, CI, 60.4%, 96.6%) and 98% (95% CI, 91.1%, 100.0%), for panel 1 and 2 respectively, with over all 94.9% sensitivity (95% CI 87.5%, 98.6%). Moreover, the clinical specificity is 97.1% (95% CI, 91.9%, 99.4%) with no cross reaction with dengue sample. The overall positive and negative predictive values are 96.2% (95% CI 89.2%, 99.2%) and 96.2% (95% CI, 90.6% 99.0%) respectively. In-house ELISA demonstrated 100% positive and negative percent agreement with ROCHE (Elecsys; Anti-SARS-CoV-2), with a Cohen’s kappa value of 1.00 (very strong agreement), while comparing 13 positive and 17 negative confirmed cases.
Conclusion The assay is rapid and can be applied as one of the early and retrospective sero-monitoring tools in all over the affected areas.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding sources
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this study was issued by the National Research Ethics Committee (NREC) of Bangladesh. Approval number BMRC/NREC/2019-2022/697.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data underlying the findings in our study are freely available in the manuscript. For additional information please refer to: http://www.grblbd.com
