Abstract
Background As the number of new and recovering COVID-19 cases continues to rise, it has become evident that patients can experience symptoms and complications after viral clearance. Clinical biomarkers characterizing patients who are likely to experience these prolonged effects are unknown.
Methods We conducted a retrospective study to compare longitudinal lab test measurements (hemoglobin, hematocrit, estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen) in patients rehospitalized after PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 clearance (n=49) versus patients not rehospitalized after viral clearance (n=173).
Results Compared to patients who were not rehospitalized after PCR-confirmed viral clearance, those who were rehospitalized had lower median hemoglobin levels in the year prior to COVID-19 diagnosis (cohen’s D = −0.74; p=0.01) and during the active infection window (cohen’s D = −1.02; p=2.4×10−7). Patients hospitalized after viral clearance were also more likely to be diagnosed with moderate or severe anemia during both intervals (pre-COVID: OR=5.91; p=0.03; active infection: OR=3.13; p=1.37×10−8).
Conclusions The diagnosis of moderate or severe anemia in the year prior to COVID-19 diagnosis and during active SARS-CoV-2 infection can aid in the identification of patients who are likely to be rehospitalized after viral clearance. Whether interventions to mitigate anemia in COVID-19 patients improve long term outcomes should be further investigated.
Trial Registration This study was not affiliated with any clinical trials.
Funding This study was funded by nference.
Brief Summary Moderate or severe anemia in the year prior to or during COVID-19 infection is associated with rehospitalization after PCR-confirmed clearance of SARS-CoV-2.
Competing Interest Statement
PL, ER, AV, GB, RM, and VS are employees of nference and have financial interests in the company. ADB is a consultant for Abbvie, is on scientific advisory boards for nference and Zentalis, is founder and President of Splissen therapeutics. One or more of the investigators associated with this project from the Mayo Clinic and the Mayo Clinic have a Financial Conflict of Interest in technology used in the research. The investigator(s) and Mayo Clinic may stand to gain financially from the successful outcome of the research. This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.
Funding Statement
This study was funded primarily by nference. ADB is supported by Grants AI 110173 and AI120698 from NIAID, 109593-62-RGRL from Amfar, and the HH Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan named professorship from Mayo Clinic.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This retrospective study was reviewed and approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB 20-003278) as a minimal risk study. Subjects were excluded if they did not have a research authorization on file.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Joint first authors
Edited title and abstract to be more reflective of the contents
Data Availability
After publication, the data will be made available to others upon reasonable requests to the corresponding author. A proposal with a detailed description of study objectives and the statistical analysis plan will be needed for evaluation of the reasonability of requests. Deidentified data will be provided after approval from the corresponding author and Mayo Clinic.