Abstract
Introduction Behavior Change Communication (BCC) serves as a key pathway for delivery of messages for modifying risky behaviors such as unsafe sex, tobacco use, consumption of unhealthy diet and sedentary lifestyle. Behavior Change Communication has been successfully applied in various health conditions, settings and on different participants. In Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), the delivery of BCC is achieved through Community Health Workers (CHWs) due to limited availability of medical personnel. Current evidence indicates that delivering such interventions through CHWs is a promising approach to achieve desired behavior change and has potential to be upscaled. However, unavailability of information regarding the applicability of these interventions at different community settings, health conditions, and medium for intervention delivery, has made upscale and implementation a challenge. This scoping review will summarize the scope of settings, communication channels, and characteristics of message delivery protocols of behavior change communication interventions targeted at adults delivered via CHWs.
Methods and analysis The scoping review methodology framework outlined by Arskey and O’Malley will guide this review. We will search the following databases, MEDLINE, ERIC, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, using pre-defined search strategy. We will include studies published in English language, without any limits on the time of publication. Firstly, titles and abstracts will be screened, followed by full-length articles, for inclusion in the review. We will extract the data in a well-defined template developed for the purpose. All the reviewers will synthesize the evidence regarding and present the results using descriptive statistics and narrative.
Ethics and dissemination This review is being conducted as a part of a doctoral thesis approved by the institutional ethics committee. The results of this scoping review will be disseminated in the form of peer-reviewed publication, and presented in conferences and will be used to design behavior change intervention to be introduced in community.
Strengths and limitations
This will be the first scoping review to scale the community settings where behavior change communication interventions have been delivered.
This review will also scale the characteristics of such interventions, viz, modality and medium of communication, and duration and periodicity of interventions.
This review will only include articles published in English language across the named freely searchable databases.
Assessment of quality of the included studies is beyond the scope of this review and hence will not be carried out.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding has been obtained for the study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This review has been approved as a part of a PhD dissertation by the Institutional Ethics Committee at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India. We will disseminate the results of the study in the form of peer-reviewed publications and conference proceedings.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos