Risk exposures, risk perceptions, negative attitudes toward general vaccination, and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among college students in South Carolina

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has spread across the world with millions infected and hundreds of thousands dead. The United States has been leading the world in the number of fatalities due to COVID-19 (250,732, as of November 19, 2020) (Johns Hopkins University and Medicine [JHUM], 2020a). The pandemic has been profoundly and adversely impacting various aspects of our societies from health systems, economic growth, to individual life. In addition to public prevention efforts, developing a safe and efficacious vaccine could be one of most promising strategies to curtail the virus, save lives and end the public health crisis. Researchers around the globe have been working collaboratively for this goal with several vaccine candidates tested in clinical trials showing promising efficacy (Centers of Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2020; National Institutes of Health [NIH], 2020). However, the success of COVID-19 vaccination program will largely depend on people’s acceptance of the vaccine. A recent global survey suggested that nearly 30% participants would be hesitate to take a COVID-19 vaccine when it is available (Kwok, Lai, Wei, Wong, & Tang, 2020). Extant literature has explored vaccine acceptance and identified a few demographic and psychosocial correlates such as gender, age, trust in research, knowledge and concerns about the novel vaccine, as well as people’s judgment and perceptions regarding risk of COVID-19 (Grech et al., 2020; Harapan et al., 2020; Palamenghi et al., 2020; Wong et al., 2020).

Risk exposure to the disease is one of essential issues that directly shape people’s assessment of their vulnerability and risk. In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, exposures to crowds and/or people infected by the virus without appropriate preventive measures increase the probabilities of infections. Even being weaponed with personal protective equipment, healthcare providers and other essential workers are considered to have high risk exposures to COVID-19 and given priority in vaccine allocations (National Academies of Sciences and Medicine, 2020; World Health Organization [WHO], 2020). Several studies suggest that being healthcare workers or being involved in the care of COVID-19 patients is positively associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (Detoc et al., 2020; Dror et al., 2020; Harapan et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020).

Risk perceptions are important precursors to health-related behaviors and other behaviors for dealing with or preventing risks (Paek & Hove, 2017). Risk perceptions refer to individuals’ subjective assessments and appraisals about the probability of experiencing harms or hazards such as injury, illness, and death. Risk perceptions are often composed of two main domains: the cognitive domain which is about how much people understand risks (e.g., perceived susceptibility, perceived severity), and emotional domain which relates to how people feel about risks (e.g., fear, dread). Many health behavior theories such as Health Belief Model (HBM), Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), and Risk Perception Attitude (RPA) models emphasize the rational and cognitive aspects of risk perceptions (Janz & Becker, 1984; Rogers, 1983; Rimal & Real, 2003). Meanwhile, as emotional aspects of risk perception being explored, some hypotheses predict that emotional reactions to risks (e.g., fear about the disease) could be independent of cognitive judgment and even are stronger determinants of individual behaviors (Loewenstein, Weber, Hsee, & Welch, 2001). In the context of COVID-19 vaccine, several studies suggest that perceived susceptibility (likelihood to get infected) and perceived severity are predictors of intention to take a vaccine (Dror et al., 2020; Graffigna, Palamenghi, Boccia, & Barello, 2020). One study suggests that a higher level of fear about COVID-19 is related to higher vaccine acceptance (Detoc et al., 2020).

Beside factors specific to the COVID-19 vaccine, individuals’ attitudes towards general vaccination may also affect their COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Existing literature has suggested that negative attitudes toward general vaccination remain a barrier to population level inoculation against a number of highly infectious diseases (Brewer, Chapman, Rothman, Leask, & Kempe, 2017). The United States has witnessed a growing anti-vaccine movement and a corresponding reduction in population immunity over the past decade (Piltch-Loeb & DiClemente, 2020). Despite of the extraordinary speed of scientific discovery regarding COVID-19, there are still a lot of uncertainties and concerns on novel vaccines in terms of safety and effectiveness. In such a context, the negative attitude toward vaccination could be exaggerated and impede people’s willingness for COVID-19 vaccine uptake.

College students in Southern states in the United States could be one of target populations for COVID-19 vaccination for several reasons. First, the COVID-19 epidemic is more prevalent and serious in the South. For example, as of October 29, 2020, South Carolina has reported cumulative COVID-19 cases of 173,491, and a testing positivity rate (for least 14 days) of 5.9%, which is beyond the threshold of 5% recommended by WHO for reopening (JHUM, 2020b). Second, most of the college and universities in the South reopened campus after the summer and college students are vulnerable for SARS-CoV-2 infection given most of them are living with roommates in apartments or residence on campus provided by the universities. Third, even there may be some travel restriction policies, colleges students have the needs to travel between their homes and schools, which makes them be more exposed to risk of infection. Fourth, young adults in the US has been identified to have low vaccination coverage. The US national data from 2010 to 2020 have revealed that younger adults (aged 18 to 49) had significantly lower influenza vaccination coverage than other age groups (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020). To address both the needs and challenges for COVID-19 vaccination among college students, it will be very helpful to understand how risk perceptions of this group may influence their COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. For example, young adults (aged 18 to 30) may develop an optimistic bias believing that they have a lower risk of infection or risks pose a less serious threat to themselves than to other age groups (Pasion, Paiva, Fernandes, & Barbosa, 2020; Wise, Zbozinek, Michelini, Hagan, & Mobbs, 2020). In addition, their decision-making and assessment of risk may be more influenced by their emotional reactions compared to adult counterpart. However, many existing studies on COVID-19 vaccination focus on samples composed of various age groups or healthcare providers, there is a dearth of empirical evidence to explore factors that may affect acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination among college students in the Southern States heavily hit by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Therefore, the current study aims to advance our understanding of key factors that may be associated with vaccine acceptance among college students in South Carolina. Specifically, we will explore 1) whether the risk exposures and risk perception of COVID-19 (perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, fear of COVID-19) are associated with vaccine acceptance; and 2) whether the negative attitudes toward general vaccination is also independently associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.

Methods

Results

Discussion

The current study is the first one to demonstrate how risk exposures, risk perceptions, and negative attitudes toward general vaccination contribute to COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among college students in a Southern state of United States after controlling for key demographic background. Given college students in this study were generally homogeneous group, their demographic characteristics did not explain much variance (i.e., 2%) of the vaccine acceptance. Risk exposures, risk perceptions, and negative attitudes toward general vaccination together accounted for 22% of variance of the vaccine acceptance suggesting they are all important factors that may influence vaccine acceptance among college students.

Consistent with extant literature on vaccine acceptance, our findings show that higher perceived severity and fear of COVID-19 are associated with higher vaccine acceptance. Although relatively severe consequences of COVID diseases and high mortality rate are reported among the elder population with existing chronic diseases such as severe heart disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease and an immunocompromised condition, there is still so much uncertainty and knowledge gaps about its treatment and care. However, there is some evidence indicating potential prolong illness caused by COVID-19 among young adults and death caused by COVID-19 may occur to a young person too (Tenforde et al., 2020). The perceived COVID-19 severity could increase the willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 across age groups (Graffigna et al., 2020; Reiter, Pennell, & Katz, 2020). Emotional dimension of risk may affect young people’s decision-making and health-related behaviors. For college students, the fear of the infection may be caused by not only potential clinical outcomes but also social consequences such as social isolation and stigma from their peers.

Existing health behavioral theories posit that higher perceived susceptibility predicts stronger motivations of taking protective actions, such as vaccine uptake. Inconsistent with extant literature on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, we found that perceived susceptibility was not significantly associated with vaccine acceptance among college students. This may be attributed to the optimistic bias in college students who are not reviewing the virus as a serious threat. Future studies are needed to further explore the different roles of the three risk perception domains in vaccine acceptance and why the impact of perceived susceptibility is not as significant as the other two factors in predicting COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.

The current study confirmed that negative attitudes toward general vaccination such as side effects and potential long-term harm independently contributed to vaccine hesitancy. The concerns on the safety of general vaccines could be intensified when people are facing a new virus. For example, the vaccination rate for the anti-H1N1 vaccine in the 2009 influenza pandemic was below expectations (Lu et al., 2010). The reports of side-effects of some on-going tested vaccine may further impede people’s confidence in vaccine. Surveys suggest that the level of reluctance to vaccinate against COVID-19 is higher than vaccine hesitancy for usual vaccines in several countries (Feleszko, Lewulis, Czarnecki, & Waszkiewicz, 2020). Given the low levels of influenza vaccine acceptance among young adults in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020), it is a large challenge to change their attitudes toward vaccination and enhance COVID vaccine uptake.

It is notable that risk exposures were negatively associated with vaccine acceptance, which means, students who reported low level risk exposure showed high vaccine acceptance, while students highly exposed to risks showed low acceptance toward COVID-19 vaccine. There are two possible explanations for this finding. First, the college students who reported low risk exposure were the ones who followed the preventive guideline and more engaged in protecting themselves from the COVID-19 because they avoided working in a crowded space or interacting with a large number of people. It is not surprising that these students demonstrated higher willingness to be vaccinated as an approach to protect themselves against infection. Second, some of the colleges students with a high level of risk exposure might have downplayed the risk of COVID-19 based on their personal experience (as especially as most of them have not been infected) and did not perceive the necessity of a vaccine. Compared with healthcare providers and other essential employees, colleges students may have more controllability over their work environment (e.g., avoid crowds, take on-line classes) and the self-reported low risk exposure may imply their controllability over environment and self-efficacy in health management. Graffigna and colleagues reported that health engagement, individual proactivity in the management of health-related issues, predicated people’s intention to take COVID-19 vaccine across age groups (Graffigna et al., 2020). However, the generally low COVID-19 fatality among young adults may also generate a perception of low risk or invulnerability among college students and lead to a low level of vaccine acceptance. Future studies are needed to further explore the complicated associations between risk exposures, controllability of personal health behavior, and vaccine acceptance.

There are several methodological limitations in the current study. First, the participants were recruited using a convenience sampling approach. Cautions are needed in applying the results in other settings or other populations since correlates of vaccine acceptance could be population and context specific. Second, cross-sectional data would prevent us from drawing any causal inference between risk perception variables and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Third, the self-report survey may be subject to response bias (e.g., social desirability). Forth, some measures in the current study were self-developed and have not yet been validated. Future research may benefit from using a random sampling approach, applying a longitudinal design, recruiting college students across different colleges, and validating self-developed measures.

Despite of these limitations, our study explored the impacts of various key perceptions and attitudes on vaccine acceptance among college students confirming the complexity of vaccine acceptance. The investigation of psychosocial reasons of young people that may hamper or promote motivations of getting vaccinated may have some important implications in public health practice since they have been shown as the most hesitant age group for the future COVID vaccine (Barello, Nania, Dellafiore, Graffigna, & Caruso, 2020; Neumann-Böhme et al., 2020). First, we need to tailor the health communication message to young adults emphasizing the severity of COVID-19 disease and its potential long-term negative consequences on health, even for young people. Educational campaigns should be tailored for young adults with comparative optimism and heightened sense of invulnerability. Second, negative attitudes toward general vaccination should be changed by sufficiently addressing the concerns and worries regarding the safety issues. Our findings reveal the importance to create and foster not only positive vaccine-specific attitudes but also general trust and positive attitudes towards vaccination and public health among young generation. Tremendous efforts and effective strategies are warranted to dispel misinformation, misconceptions, and various conspiratorial theories around vaccination. Third, it is urgent for healthcare providers to identify and target the most vulnerable sub-group among college students, those reported high risk exposures and low vaccine acceptance. They may be unable to realize the severity of COVID-19 or lack of controllability/self-efficacy of managing their own health. Interventions are needed to increase their perceived severity and promote their self-efficacy in health management and encourage them to take protective behaviors including vaccine uptake.

Conclusion

As extant studies suggest, the reluctance toward and refusal of COVID-19 vaccine is a world-wide problem. Different age-group may have different and specific attitudes and concerns regarding the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Investigating sociodemographic and psychosocial factors that affect vaccine acceptance is fundamental for an effective immunization plan. The current study provides preliminary findings to understand college students’ acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine and how their risk exposures, risk perceptions and attitudes toward general vaccination contributed to vaccine acceptance. Policy makers and practitioners may target high risk groups by assessing their perceived risks of COVID-19 in cognitive and emotional dimensions, tailor the vaccine communication messages based on college students’ psychological dynamics of decision-making and addressed their concerns, and particularly pay attention to those reported high risks exposures to virus while showed low intention to vaccine uptake.