ABSTRACT
Importance Resurgent COVID-19 cases have resulted in the re-institution of nonpharmaceutical interventions, including school closure, which can have adverse effects on families. Understanding the impact of schools on the number of incident and cumulative COVID-19 cases is critical for decision-making.
Objective To determine the quantitative effect of schools being open or closed relative to community-based nonpharmaceutical interventions on the number of COVID-19 cases.
Design An agent-based transmission model.
Setting A synthetic population of one million individuals based on the characteristics of the population of Ontario, Canada.
Participants Members of the synthetic population clustered into households, neighborhoods or rural districts, cities or a rural region, day care facilities, classrooms – primary, elementary or high school, colleges or universities and workplaces.
Exposure School reopening on September 15, 2020, versus schools remaining closed under different scenarios for nonpharmaceutical interventions.
Main Outcome and Measures Incident and cumulative COVID-19 cases between September 1, 2020 and October 31, 2020.
Results The percentage of infections among students and teachers acquired within schools was less than 5% across modelled scenarios. Incident case numbers on October 31, 2020, were 4,414 (95% credible interval, CrI: 3,491, 5,382) and 4,740 (95% CrI 3,863, 5,691), for schools remaining closed versus reopening, respectively, with no other community-based nonpharmaceutical intervention; 714 (95%, CrI: 568, 908) and 780 (95% CrI 580, 993) for schools remaining closed versus reopening, respectively, with community-based nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented; 777 (95% credible CrI: 621, 993) and 803 (95% CrI 617, 990) for schools remaining closed versus reopening, respectively, applied to the observed case numbers in Ontario in early October 2020. Contrasting the scenarios with implementation of community-based interventions versus not doing so yielded a mean difference of 39,355 cumulative COVID-19 cases by October 31, 2020, while keeping schools closed versus reopening them yielded a mean difference of 2,040 cases.
Conclusions and relevance Our simulations suggest that the majority of COVID-19 infections in schools were due to acquisition in the community rather than transmission within schools and that the effect of school reopening on COVID-19 case numbers is relatively small compared to the effects of community-based nonpharmaceutical interventions.
Question With resurgence of COVID-19, reinstitution of school closure remains a possibility. Given the harm that closures can cause to children and families, the expected quantitative effect of school reopening or closure on incident and cumulative COVID-19 case numbers is an important consideration.
Finding Relative to community-based nonpharmaceutical interventions, school closure resulted in a small change in COVID-19 incidence trajectories and cumulative case counts.
Meaning Community-based interventions should take precedence over school closure.
Competing Interest Statement
Kali Barrett has received personal fees from Xenios AG, outside of the submitted work. No other competing interests are declared.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by COVID-19 Rapid Research Funding (C-291-2431272-SANDER through the Ontario Ministry of Health, Ontario Together grant. This research was supported, in part, by a Canada Research Chair in Economics of Infectious Diseases held by Beate Sander (CRC-950-232429). Sharmistha Mishra is supported by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Mathematical Modeling and Program Science.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Concept and design: Naimark, Sander, Mishra, Ximenes.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Naimark, Sander, Mishra.
Drafting of the manuscript: Naimark, Sander, Mishra, Barrett.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Naimark, Sander, Mishra, Khan, Barrett, Mac, Ximenes.
Obtained funding: Naimark, Sander, Khan, Barret, Mac, Ximenes.
Funding/Support: This research was supported by COVID-19 Rapid Research Funding (C-291-2431272-SANDER through the Ontario Ministry of Health, Ontario Together grant. This research was supported, in part, by a Canada Research Chair in Economics of Infectious Diseases held by Beate Sander (CRC-950-232429). Sharmistha Mishra is supported by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Mathematical Modeling and Program Science.
Conflict of interest disclosure: Kali Barrett has received personal fees from Xenios AG, outside of the submitted work. No other competing interests are declared.
Role of the funder/sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; in the preparation of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
One author's first name corrected, three additional ORCHID IDs added
Data Availability
Data employed in this analysis is in the public domain
