Achieving engagement with a Deliberate Practice programme using portable laparoscopy simulators - “Incentivised Laparoscopy Practice”

Background The transfer validity of portable laparoscopy simulation is well established. However, attempts to integrate take-home simulation into surgical training have met with inconsistent engagement, as reported in our 2014-15 study of an Incentivised Laparoscopy Practice (ILP) programme. Our subsequent multi-centre study examined barriers and facilitators, informing revisions of the programme for 2018-20. We now report engagement with the revised versions.

Methods In ILP v2.1 and 2.2, two consecutive year-groups of new CSTs (n= 48 and 46) were loaned portable simulators. The 6-month programme included induction, technical support, and intermittent feedback. Six tasks were prescribed, with video instruction and charting of metric scores. Video uploads were required and scored by faculty. A pass resulted in an eCertificate, expected at Annual Review. ILP was set within a wider reform, “Improving Surgical Training”.

Results ILP v2.1 and 2.2 saw pass rates of 94% and 76% (45/48 and 35/46 trainees respectively), compared with only 26% (7/27) in v1, despite the v2.1 and v2.2 groups having less electronic gaming experience. In the ILP v2.2 group, 73% reported their engagement was adversely affected by COVID19 redeployments.

Conclusions Simply providing kit, no matter how good, is not enough. To achieve trainee engagement with take- home simulators, as in ILP v2, a whole programme is required, with motivated learning, individual and group practice, intermittent feedback, and clear goals and assessments. ILP is a complex intervention, best understood as a “reform within a reform, within a context.” This may explain why trainee engagement fell away during early pandemic conditions.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT

• Attaining automation of motor skills is essential to free up operating surgeons’ attention for higher cognitive functions.

• Laparoscopic operating skills can transfer from simulation to the operating room, and deliberate practice is the most important variable in the development of expertise.

• Simply providing take-home portable simulators to surgical trainees, even with online training programmes, is insufficient to facilitate consistent deliberate practice by more than a minority of trainees.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

• A package of evidence-based reforms transformed participation of Core Surgical trainees in a 6-month programme of practice using take-home portable simulators, resulting in near- 100% engagement.

• Such reforms are complex, including motivators for learning, individual and group practice, intermittent feedback, clear goals and assessments, and adoption into a wider curriculum reform called “Improving Surgical Training”.

• The improved engagement with this form of remote simulation-based training did not continue in the face of a national “lockdown” for the COVID19 pandemic, where there was widespread redeployment of trainees.