Abstract
Objective Few studies have investigated the neurological underpinnings of social-emotional processing among individuals with non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), despite the range of interpersonal impairments associated with the behavior. This study aims to identify NSSI-specific patterns of resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) and neural activation during an emotional facial expression task.
Methods Participants were currently depressed, antidepressant-free adolescents with and without lifetime history of NSSI. Left and right amygdala were specified as seed regions for RSFC analysis (n=43 NSSI, n=9 clinical controls). The emotional faces task presented participants with neutral, happy, and sad faces. Whole-brain analyses examined neural activation during the task, and groups were compared on post-scan ratings of facial emotional intensity (n=39 NSSI, n=9 clinical controls).
Results Groups did not differ in RSFC analyses. Adolescents with NSSI showed attenuated neural activation to happy (versus neutral) faces in areas of the occipital lobe and cerebellum, and rated neutral and sad faces as more negative than clinical controls.
Conclusions While groups did not differ in baseline limbic connectivity, neurological and behavioral findings revealed NSSI-specific alterations in processing of social-emotional stimuli. Depressed adolescents with NSSI interpreted ambiguous or negative social stimuli more negatively than depressed controls, and had an attenuated neural response to positive social stimuli. This negative bias likely contributes to the myriad interpersonal difficulties associated with NSSI. Adolescents with NSSI may benefit from treatments which combat these negative social interpretations and improve control over emotional responses to interpersonal stress.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
MR-IMPACT was funded by the UK Medical Research Council [grant: G0802226], with additional support from the National Institute for Health Research, financial support from the Department of Health, the Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, and the Wellcome Trust. The IMPACT study was funded by the Health Technology Assessment Branch of the National Institute of Health Research UK. Funding sources had no involvement in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; the writing of the report; or the decision to submit for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Cambridgeshire 2 Research Ethics Committee (reference number 09/H0308/168)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Note, John Suckling and Paul Wilkinson joint last author
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
