Abstract
Parkinsonian disorders, including Parkinson’s disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonian disorders (APD), are characterized by shared clinical features of parkinsonism and although there are distinct clinical and pathological diagnostic criterion for PD and APD, patients present in the clinic with overlapping clinical features, which evolve with a great deal of variability and complexity over time. This leads to high level of uncertainty in the prediction of diagnosis and progression for an individual patient on clinical grounds. There have been recent initiatives to make available large-scale datasets from multiple research studies such as Accelerating Medicines Partnership for Parkinson’s Disease (AMP PD). However, these is a clear lack of a common terminological system or ontology that can support query analysis of datasets in AMP PD and map across multiple instruments used in the assessment of PD as well as APD. To address these challenges, we developed the Movement Disorder Ontology (MDO) that used a systematic analysis of movement disorder instruments, extensive review of literature led by a movement disorder specialists, and the AMP PD knowledge portal with an iterative ontology engineering process. The current version of MDO is focused on parkinsonian disorders with 203 concepts modeled in three broad categories of: (1) neurological findings, (2) treatment plans, and (3) instruments used to evaluate various traits of PD. MDO holds potential for use in clinical research especially in the context of large-scale phenotypic data available in public repositories such AMP PD with support for concept-based data analysis and potentially correlating with genotypic data.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was supported in part by the Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative (CTSC) of Cleveland which is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS), Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) grant, UL1TR002548. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. This project was also supported in part by the NSF grant# 1636850.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not applicable
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Not applicable