Abstract
The COVID-19 outbreak has forced most countries to impose new contact-limiting restrictions at workplaces, universities, schools, and more broadly in our societies. Yet, the power and limitations of these unprecedented strategies for containing virus spread within the populations remain unquantified. Here, we develop a simulation study to analyze COVID-19 outbreak magnitudes on three real-life contact networks stemming from a workplace, a primary school and a high school in France.
Our study provides the first fine-grained analysis of the impact of contact-limiting strategies at work-places, schools and high schools, including (1) Rotating, in which workers are evenly split into two shifts that alternate on a daily or weekly basis; and (2) On-Off, where the whole group alternates periods of normal work interactions with complete telecommuting. We model epidemics spread in these different setups using an SEIR transmission model enriched with the coronavirus most salient specificities: super-spreaders, infectious asymptomatic individuals, and pre-symptomatic infectious periods. Our study yields clear results: The ranking of the strategies based on their ability to mitigate epidemic propagation in the network from a first index case is the same for all network topologies (work place, primary school and high school). Namely, from best to worst: Rotating week-by-week, Rotating day-by-day, On-Off week-by-week, and On-Off day-by-day. Moreover, our results show that when the baseline reproduction number R0 within the network is < 1.38, all four strategies efficiently control outbreak by decreasing effective Re to ¡1. These results can support public health decisions and telecommuting organization locally.
Significance statement
We take advantage of available individual-level contact data for school and workplace social networks, to simulate COVID-19 epidemics on real-life networks. This framework enable us to compare and rank natural prevention strategies that require hybrid telecommuting, either for everyone synchronously (On-Off) or periodically switching between two groups of people (Rotating): weekly or daily Rotating, weekly or daily On-Off, and full telecommuting. All strategies have a significant impact when the reproduction number within the network is moderately high (< 1.3). These results can inform public health decisions and telecommuting organization at the local scale.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Guillaume Duboc and Claire Mathieu were partially supported by a grant from CNRS. Lulla Opatowski was supported by a grant from ANR.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We did not collect nor used newly collected data in this study. The data used was downloaded form publicly available website: sociopattern.org. The data was previously published, with the authors mentioning approval from the he French national bodies responsible for ethics and privacy, the Commission Nationale de l Informatique et des Libertes (CNIL, http://www.cnil.fr) and the CPP, Comite de Protection des personnes (http://www.cppsudest2.fr/).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
L.O. has received research funding from Pfizer (through her research unit) on research related to meningococcal epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance.
S.M., G.D., M.D., L.V. ran the simulations and performed the research. All authors participated in the research design, discussions, and writing.
Data Availability
All data referred to in the manuscript are already available on sociopatterns.org. results from our simulations will be made available.
