Primary school staff reflections on school closures due to COVID-19 and recommendations for the future: a national qualitative survey

Participants

A purposive sample of staff (headteachers, deputy headteachers, teachers, teaching assistants, support staff) working in primary schools across Wales were invited to participate in the HAPPEN School Staff survey in July 2020. All primary schools in Wales (which include pupils from ages 3-11) were contacted via email through HAPPEN inviting their staff to complete the survey. A snowball method was encouraged in which the representative from each school was asked to share the survey with staff within the primary school.

A total of 208 staff from 78 primary schools across 16 local authorities completed the survey (8% did not provide details on school name or local authority). The sample consisted of 20 headteachers, 9 deputy headteachers, 106 teachers, 54 teaching assistants, 3 higher level teaching assistants, 9 support staff and 6 other (e.g. supply teacher, special needs/additional learning needs teacher). The survey was open to staff across all years of primary school (reception: ages 4-5; year 1: ages 5-6; year 2: ages 6-7; year 3: ages 7-8; year 4: ages 8-9; year 5: ages 9-10; year 6: ages 10-11). Of those that provided information on year group, 41% worked within the Foundation Phase (ages 3-7) and 59% in Key Stage 2 (ages 7-11). Information regarding the proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals (FSM) within each school was obtained from 84% of the sample and ranged from 1.7-58.7% (national average 19%). 50% of school staff worked in schools with a proportion of pupils eligible for FSM greater than the national average (>19%).

Ethics

Information sheets and consent forms were distributed to participants detailing the aims of the study. To participate in the survey, primary school staff were required to provide acknowledgment they understood the information sheet and consented to participate at the start of the online survey. Ethical approval was granted by the Swansea University Medical School Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 2017-0033D). All participants were reminded of their right to withdraw from the research at any point. All personal data such as school names were anonymised. Electronic data (survey responses) were stored in password protected files.

School staff survey

The online school staff survey consisted of questions about the logistics of the phased reopening of schools, the experiences of staff regarding benefits/negative effects of lockdown and school closures on children in their class/school, recommendations for a future lockdown/school closures, in addition to concerns and recommendations for the full-time reopening of schools. These questions were open-ended in order to gather information rich responses regarding participants’ views, experiences and recommendations. For the purpose of this research study, responses relating to lockdown/school closures were gathered from the following questions; (i) ‘Have you seen any benefits of lockdown for children in your class/school? (This could be about learning or the wider benefits)’, (ii) ‘Have you seen any negative effects of lockdown for children in your class/school? (This could be about learning or the wider risks)’ and (iii) ‘If lockdown happened again, what do you think should be done differently?’. Responses relating to the full-time return to education were gathered from the following questions; (iv) ‘How do you feel about all children returning to school in September?’, (v) ‘What are your main concerns about returning to school in September?’ and (vi) ‘What would help to make this easier?’. To give a quantitative understanding of the type of support children require on return, the survey also asked a multiple choice question of “What professional development, training or support do you think you may need to support your return to school?”, with options of digital skills, supporting learner health and wellbeing, health and safety training, teaching and learning approaches or other.

Data analysis

This research study adopted an interpretive approach through thematic analysis of survey responses in order to gain an understanding of the perspectives and recommendations of primary school staff regarding school closures and the full-time reopening of schools. Responses from the school staff survey were downloaded to a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The lead researcher (EM) followed an open coding process in which words and phrases were assigned to participants’ responses. Another researcher (CT) independently coded random survey responses from 50 participants. These coding responses were compared between researchers to ensure accuracy and consistency. Agreement between researchers was very high; if there was a discrepancy or disagreement, a third researcher adjudicated. Following this, the two researchers worked together through an extensive process of categorising codes into themes and sub-theme headings. These themes and sub-themes were then grouped into over-arching recommendations based on school staff suggestions for future school closures and the reopening of schools.

Recommendation 1: Prioritise the health and wellbeing of pupils and staff

A key priority highlighted by school staff was the importance of prioritising the health and wellbeing of pupils and staff, with school staff consistently mentioning the negative impact of school closures on children’s physical and mental health and social development. There was a recognition that some children were very supported in lockdown, with potential benefits to their wellbeing; “Spending time with family, baking, walking etc has been hugely beneficial to their wellbeing” (headteacher). However, this was not the case for all children in which “[Lockdown] has been good for children to spend more time with families. But not so great for some” (teacher).

There were significant concerns expressed by school staff regarding wellbeing, anxiety and general mental health problems. One headteacher incorporated quantitative measures of children’s wellbeing during lockdown and reported that “assessments undertaken since lockdown indicate a decline in emotional well-being”. In addition, of the categorical responses asking school staff what professional development or training staff required upon the return to school, 62% chose ‘Supporting learning health and wellbeing’, highlighting the demand for additional support within the school setting.

Many teachers also felt that pupils were engaging in less physical activity during lockdown, “less active” (year 1 teacher), and others perceiving a “lack of physical fitness” (reception teacher). In addition, weight gain was highlighted by a number of teachers; “some children have put on an unhealthy amount of weight” (year 2 teaching assistant).

Upon the phased return to school in July, school staff observed that “some seem lethargic coming into school and parents report poor sleep routines” (headteacher). Others perceived that the lack of school routine impacted subsequent class behaviour, stating there were “discipline issues with pupils not having the school structure for a long time” (year 3 teacher). The challenge of children resuming school routines after a long period away from the school environment was highlighted; “the children will have been affected by being out of school for so long, and will have trouble re-adjusting to school life” (year 2 teacher). This was also raised by school staff in relation to children with additional learning needs (ALN); “ALN children especially finding this time difficult - Struggles due to lack of routine for many” (year 2 teacher).

Staff were concerned about the lack of social interaction during the period of school closures, with those teaching younger year groups referencing pupils to be “isolated” (reception teacher), “distanced from peers” (year 2 teacher) and commenting that “children reluctant to speak in group contexts” (year 3 teacher). Some teachers had received concerns from parents regarding their children; “Some parents have informed us that their children are quite withdrawn and have stopped connecting with friends” (year 4 teacher), and other teachers highlighted similar experiences; “Some pupils are quieter and withdrawn” (year 6 teacher). In addition, primary school staff also reported a perceived increase in screen time, social media use and gaming, with responses including “a lot of time spent on computers and not going outside” (year 2 teaching assistant), and “out of routines. Playing inappropriate games and excessive screen time” (year 3 teacher).

Therefore, a key recommendation for potential school closures or remote learning (e.g. self-isolating) was the importance of maintaining and promoting good health and wellbeing. This included suggestions of “more wellbeing phone calls to children and parents” (reception teacher). A number of teachers suggested that this should be prioritised immediately for example through “wellbeing checks from the start, more interaction with children from the start” (year 1 teacher).

On the phased reopening, school staff noticed large variation in children’s abilities and the support children had received while at home. A significant concern was the regression of key skills and knowledge during the period of school closures; “Many not accessing learning and falling behind or regressing” (reception support staff), “retention of skills has weakened” (year 4 teacher), and “their motivation has reduced. Key skills deteriorated. Knowledge lost” (year 3 teacher). Given this skill regression reported, some feared that “there might be a push on rushing straight back into learning at a fast pace where I think the health and wellbeing needs to be the main focus” (higher level teaching assistant). Increased inequalities and gaps in learning were consistently highlighted by school staff, with responses including “children’s wellbeing, gaps in learning - especially between groups of learners who have engaged and those who haven’t with home learning” (year 4 teacher). Increasing inequalities were also highlighted regarding children with ALN as “some have had no learning as have either not the support at home to help or have refused to work outside of the school setting… list is endless working at a SEN [special educational needs] school” (teaching assistant) and “The vulnerable and ALN pupils generally have not engaged in the sessions” (headteacher).

Despite the learning regression observed, it was still felt that prioritising health and wellbeing was essential upon return to school, particularly with the uncertainty surrounding the longer-term impacts of COVID-19 on the wider education system. Thus, upon the return to school a teacher called for “the ability to support pupils emotionally as well as forwarding their education” (year 5 teacher). Suggestions of removing pressure from formal tests and assessments in order to focus on wellbeing and resuming school routine were made, addressing the concern by school staff of readjusting back to school life; “Support from senior management to allow us to nurture the children and settle them before they start learning. Less pressure about assessments and attainments and more focus on the children and their needs and feelings” (higher level teaching assistant). Removing this pressure placed upon school assessments and attainment was highlighted by a range of school staff, with responses including “less emphasis on school results/comparing of schools attainment/moderation” (deputy headteacher), and “no target setting or data collection next year”.

Recommendations for prioritising health and wellbeing within the school environment included “planned activities around the well-being of children” (year 3 teaching assistant) and “designated staff in each school to help with well-being” (year 3 teacher). In addition, school staff advocated for time outdoors through outdoor learning and play provision, “Timetabled regular outdoor sessions, some planned, some free play” (reception teacher) with support to “help take groups outside to work on health and well-being” (year 6 teacher). In order to maintain time spent outside, one teacher recommended that “we need outdoor shelters so we can do more outside work and the bubbles” (year 2 teacher).

School staff also raised concerns that their own wellbeing had been ignored during the period of school closures and returning to school. School staff responses regarding lockdown and remote learning included the challenges of combining work and home life in not being able to ‘switch off’; “the lines blurred with work life balance” (headteacher) and that there should be “less pressure on teachers to continue to provide the same level of work whilst working from home trying to support our own families” (year 4 teacher). One suggestion in the case of a future potential school closures or periods of self-isolation was to ensure that school bulletins, emails and texts stayed within school time. Others advocated for more flexibility such as “flexible hours” (year 3 teacher) and “flexible working for teachers” (year 4 teacher).

Upon the phased reopening, school staff commented that “all stakeholders don’t seem to be considering the staff’s well-being and worries and anxieties about the whole school return” (year 6 teacher), and that there were “staff anxieties with more children and less social distancing” (headteacher). Concerns were also raised about staff wellbeing in relation to adhering to social distancing and the lack of contact with other school staff; “Staff isolation - the very nature of primary school approach is collaboration and support… But this is why I mentioned ‘staff isolation’ and protected breaks - it’s an issue” (year 6 teacher). Therefore, within the school day, staff recommended “protecting staff breaks (which is essential and hasn’t happened during ‘return to school’)” (year 6 teacher).

To address issues of school staff wellbeing, a headteacher emphasised that “Government need to address teacher anxiety. We need to know that our health is also a priority”, whilst another teacher encouraged schools “to continue to be supportive of each other and each other’s wellbeing” (year 6 teacher).

Fears regarding infection transmission within the school setting were highlighted consistently, and school staff called for scientific evidence to support the return to school; “Having more concrete medical information stating that I am not putting my life at jeopardy being amongst so many and not being able to socially distance. Not being able to protect myself, the pupil I look after or others around him” (year 1 teaching assistant). Other transmission concerns amongst staff were raised by those deemed as high risk, or with vulnerable family members; “As a vulnerable member of staff I fear going back with a full class and spending the day trying to distance myself. How can I teach properly like that?” (year 1 teacher) and another stating “I risk taking the virus home to members of my family who are extremely vulnerable” (support staff).

Recommendations to address this included regular virus testing and increased availability of testing for pupils and school staff, with responses including “routine testing of school staff including being given an anti-body test” (year 3 teacher) and “regular and continuous testing in schools, and strict self-isolating for bubbles” (year 4 teacher). Furthermore, school staff emphasised the importance of having effective test, trace and protect programmes; “A more robust track and trace system where people are informed of numbers in areas etc” (deputy headteacher). There was indeed overlap here with recommendation 5 regarding clearer guidance and communication.

Recommendation 2: Focus on enabling parental support and engagement

The importance of the home learning environment during school closures was highlighted as a key factor in children’s learning progression. School staff spoke about some of the benefits of engaged parents providing one-to-one attention to their children. Engaged parents was also reflected in improved relationships with and communication between the school and parents; “We’ve established an excellent working relationship with parents. Parents have taken more responsibility over their children’s learning and wellbeing” (headteacher) and school staff commented; “A massive improvement witnessed in the communication between myself, school and parents” (reception teacher).

Of benefit to schools were discussions that “parents more aware of the learning needs of their children” (year 3 teacher) and a sense of “parents’ realisation of what pupils are taught” (year 3 teacher). For some, this enabled parents to communicate with schools regarding extra support for their children; “Parents have become more aware of what their children can and cannot do and have sought advice about how to address the areas of concern” (year 4 teacher).

However, school staff highlighted wide variations in home learning provision; “For those children who have had parents who have supported them with online learning this has been great”. Discussions on this topic included the inequalities and inequities present and a sense of widening gaps in learning was projected; “Gaps in learning depending on parental support” (deputy headteacher). Another headteacher affirmed that for these pupils, “their home life has provided limited stimulation”.

Therefore, some teachers recommended that there needed to be “more accountability from certain parents” (year 4 teacher) and others discussed this in relation to parental engagement, stating the importance of “finding a way of stressing to disengaged parents the importance of completing some work at home” (reception teacher). Recommendations to address this included “parents being required to check in weekly” (year 1 teacher).

However, many school staff discussed the various challenges that acted as a barrier to parents in facilitating home learning. This included parental working commitments including children of parents working in “key worker” occupations, recognised as those that are critical to the COVID-19 response such as roles in health and social care; “Children of critical care workers have had limited support from parents re learning due to them working very long hours” (headteacher), a number of children in the household, and parents with other working responsibilities that did not classify as a “key worker”; “Parents who are still working (not eligible for hub) find it difficult to teach pupils and work particularly if there are two or more children at home” (year 3 teacher). Additional challenges for home learning were present, for example for those pupils “who have parents with little or no English” (teacher). School staff also found that some “parents find teaching the work difficult” (year 1 teacher) and suggested additional challenges for children with ALN such as “stress for parents/carers as I teach children with ALN” (teacher), and more broadly “living with stressed parents” (year 5 teacher).

In order to address this, staff recommended that “parents need to be supported more to complete the home learning” (headteacher) and suggestions included that “parents had access to a local helpline that could direct them for support” (headteacher). Other recommendations to support parents with home learning included meetings and live feeds with teachers to access support; “Possibly meetings with parents, to offer support and guidance in regards to best way to support their child at home. Opportunities for parents to access live feeds with teachers - if only to reassure and encourage” (year 4 teacher). In addition, a more universal and regular approach to supporting parents and families was suggested; “Weekly check in with those families who need support, not just those on the vulnerable list” (year 6 teacher). Other challenges relating to parental engagement encompassed barriers regarding digital support that will be outlined in the following recommendation.

School staff also recommended working with parents regarding their expectations and suggested asking “parents’ views about home learning” to ensure that parental expectations aligned with school priorities. In addition, primary school staff highlighted the importance of building rapport with parents to ensure “better home/school links set up beforehand” (year 1 teacher). Others recommended more direct communication between teachers and parents “rather than just headteacher to parents” (reception teacher) and emphasised that communication with parents should be an ongoing process.

Recommendation 3: Enhance (pupil, parent and staff) digital competence through increased access and support

During lockdown and school closures, teaching was achieved primarily through digital methods requiring children to engage with remote learning online. Thus, this required access to appropriate technology and a general understanding and competence of basic digital skills. School staff highlighted that this acted as a barrier to progression with learning for some children as “some children were unable to access online learning” (year 2 teaching assistant) and others stated that “lots of children who were digitally excluded suffered as the extra digital resources were not made available to the children until weeks into lockdown” (year 6 teacher).

Competing demands for use of digital technology within the household prevented children from learning; “Lack of IT equipment where same members of the family use the equipment” (teacher), “some large families are having to share one device” (year 3 teacher) and “some children were working from phones” (year 4 teacher).

It was reported by school staff that parents with lower digital competence skills and a lack of access to digital equipment were contributing to widening gaps; “Widened gap of those that have/have not devices and know-how. Lack of parental knowledge of technology has hindered some” (deputy headteacher) and “some parents have been reluctant to use Hwb [national virtual learning environment and resource repository] as they are not familiar with it” (year 2 teacher). A concern for schools was that “some parents were too embarrassed to ask for help in regards to support with technology” (year 4 teacher).

Therefore, access to digital equipment was a consistent recommendation in the case of a blended learning approach; “all pupils need to be given a laptop/internet access if they don’t already have one. Lessons introductions should be recorded” (year 6 teacher) and “ensure all children are equipped with digital equipment to access online learning” (year 3 teacher). Gathering information on children’s access to digital equipment was suggested through a “survey of access for pupils regarding IT access and internet access” (teacher). In addition to the provision of equipment, school staff highlighted that digital training may be required for pupils; “Children need to be trained up on how to access digital resources and live lessons beforehand” (year 3 teacher).

Schools attempted to support those pupils without equipment through the provision of resources; “Some pupils didn’t have digital devices but this was dealt with by loaning Chrome Books” (Year 2 teaching assistant). However, where this was not possible, a recommendation involved the combination of both digital and paper-based options for children without access to appropriate technology; “Paper based work for pupils who cannot access online work” (year 5 teacher).

Additional digital training for teachers was also advocated as challenges were raised including “staff confidence in use of technology and the pitfalls of live streaming” (headteacher). Therefore, digital support was recommended; “teachers trained to be able to deliver online teaching” (reception teacher), and references to blended learning were also made; “ensure that teachers have training in blended learning and that the approach is consistent across the school” (year 6 teacher).

Regarding internet access in the home, a teacher recommended to “ensure all parents have access to the Internet for online learning” (year 2 teacher). However, internet access without digital knowledge or competence was a barrier to parents. Therefore, supporting parents with digital training was also advocated, with suggestions such as “have sessions with parents on how to use Google Classroom to ensure they can support learning” (year 4 teacher), and ensuring “a support process in place for those parents who encounter any online difficulties” (higher level teaching assistant).

Recommendation 4: Adapt the learning environment and teaching practice

During the phased reopening of schools and a return to full-time education, school staff discussed the factors relating to the learning environment and teaching practice that required adaptations in order to support children’s learning, wellbeing and address the widened inequalities. The most consistent factors suggested by school staff were that of smaller class sizes and additional staff. Many school staff commented on the benefits of smaller class sizes during the phased return to school. The guidance on reduced pupil attendance during this period forced the need for smaller class sizes and many reflected on the positives of this; “The children have thrived in smaller groups. We have seen quieter pupils come out of their shells as they have not been ‘drowned out’ by the more enthusiastic. They have also had more individual support. We have seen a number of pupils learning more due to being in a smaller group” (headteacher).

The reduced numbers in class during the phased return to school allowed for a focus to be placed on whole-school wellbeing, addressing previous concerns and recommendations regarding prioritising wellbeing. In addition, it allowed extra support for pupils that required help; “Smaller classes have provided more quality ‘chats’ with teacher which has benefitted the children’s wellbeing and been particularly helpful in reducing levels of anxiety. The more relaxed structure has had positive effects on staff and pupil wellbeing on the whole” (year 6 support staff).

Reduced class sizes and staffing capacity was discussed in relation to the ratio of staff to pupils and being able to provide additional support where required as a result of widened gaps in learning; “Having full classes and not having the time to talk to the pupils who will really need it. Pressure to help those pupils who haven’t engaged in any learning to catch up” (year 3 teacher).

Recommendations for the longer-term changes in class size were relayed and the benefits this could bring to pupils’ learning; “Smaller class sizes and more staff - the reason why the private sector do so well… The pupils have said how it is easier to learn within a smaller group” (headteacher). However, this also required additional staffing capacity, with the need for more staff and funding; “Support in regards to mental health and wellbeing, possibly reduced class sizes, extra support for pastoral care and to help catch up. More funding” (year 4 teacher)

Funding and investment by the government requiring long-term commitment to support adaptations to current education practice was recommended. This would enable schools in reducing class sizes, especially in the context of major national curriculum reform in Wales that was published in January 2020, to start from September 2022 [21]. This included ensuring the necessary support and capacity for pupils was available; “I understand that we have to get the economy going but if the Government wants children to ‘catch up’ they need to understand the positive impact of being in smaller groups. Due to budget constraints we have had large classes to keep jobs - now is the time to INVEST in learning - class sizes no greater than 20. This will have a massive impact on pupil learning” (headteacher). Extra staffing was also suggested in relation to school autonomy, with a teacher suggesting the need for “funding for extra staff to manage the needs of the individual school” (year 5 teacher).

Finally, the enhanced cleaning and hygiene practices that schools need to adopt on return was also remarked upon as a concern of school staff in terms of the expectations, time taken and support; “Maintaining good hand hygiene with a full class of 30 will be very difficult to monitor and very time consuming” (year 5 teacher). Teachers were concerned that cleaning time will be time taken away from supporting children with learning; “Staff regularly cleaning surfaces and toilets and won’t have much time to support children” (headteacher). However, ensuring schools maintained an effective cleaning practice was recommended; “I think we need to try it and make it as safe as we possibly can by making sure we have good hygiene practice in place” (reception teacher).

Recommendation 5: Clear communication of guidance and expectations

Regarding a full-time return to education, school staff advocated for advance notice from government and public health officials regarding any new changes in guidance to schools. Senior leadership and teachers advocated for “clear guidance from day one” (headteacher) and “clear communications between Government, local authorities and schools” (reception teacher). Clear guidance was a consistent recommendation by school staff who called for “proactive communication from Government” (year 6 teacher) and “precise guidelines from the Government” (headteacher).

Others called for an understanding of school needs and contexts, highlighting a need for “clear guidance from Government with an understanding of how schools operate” (reception teacher). School staff recommended that it was essential that communication between government and schools was done so transparently and on a regular and rapid basis; “More information being given to schools explaining the reasoning behind decisions made, given to us before the general public rather than at the same time” (year 3 teacher). However, a mistrust in statistics and scientific evidence was highlighted, with a learning support teacher stating there was a “lack of confidence in the data we are given”.

Schools being given advance notice of guidance and decision making was valued as important, suggesting for “clearer information from government. Consult teachers before making decisions and let schools know their plans before announcements to the public” (year 3 teacher) and “knowing earlier so we can prepare” (support staff). In particular, clear guidance and communication was highlighted consistently in relation to providing schools with adequate preparation time “to have time to implement and understand it. Ask questions if needed”.

Schools required regular government communication to include information on expectations; “Regular updates for parents as well as schools on expectations of pupils with regards to Government guidelines” (reception teacher). School staff also commented that improved governmental decision-making and communication would facilitate school-to-parent dialogue, allowing schools to share information regarding school practice with parents in a timely manner and aid school preparation and planning; “Better communication with schools from the Government so that we could pass on information to parents more effectively” (deputy headteacher). It was also suggested that this would help to manage parental expectations regarding school operation and children’s learning; “Clear guidance and expectations from the government in order to make plans and inform parents of what school will look like… We cannot plan unless we have been told what it needs to look like” (year 1 teacher).

School staff leadership advocated for a “flexible curriculum. Trust teachers’ professional judgement of their children” (deputy headteacher) and “accepting our school autonomy, trust us, let us innovate” (headteacher). Strong leadership by senior management was highlighted as important by school staff, with benefits to teacher confidence and trust associated with a supportive headteacher; “I’m also certain that my headteacher will be very supportive in the process as she always is and things will be made easier with her guidance” (higher level teaching assistant).

Regarding a blended learning approach, teachers advocated for more “consistent expectations of how teachers plan for home learning by their school” (year 3 teacher). Generally, references to consistency encompassed a school’s approach, expectations and organisation to ensure that there is “a plan in place if this happens again to make sure all pupils are involved in keeping up with their learning” (reception teacher).

Strengths and limitations

Findings from this study provide detailed experiences of a range of primary school staff about the period of school closures due to COVID-19, their perspectives about the phased reopening of schools and recommendations for the future. This paper contributes to the limited evidence base that currently exists regarding the impact of school closures on pupils and school staff, and the challenges and opportunities posed for schools during a return to full-time education. Importantly, the recommendations that conclude this paper offer practical insight and learning to support schools in ensuring a safe return to education. In addition, the findings and recommendations from this paper provide knowledge on priority areas for future policy focus in reducing the inequalities that have widened during the pandemic.

There are limitations to review when considering the findings from this study. Although all schools in Wales were contacted with details regarding the staff survey, the findings in this study only represent those that participated. Schools adopted varying approaches to remote teaching and in their return to education and thus, those reflected in this study may not encapsulate all approaches. However, the sample consists of a range of primary school staff including headteachers, teachers and support staff working in schools with a wide range of pupils eligible for free school meals within 16 of 22 local authorities in Wales. The experiences of primary school staff are based on their perceptions of the impact of lockdown on pupils and quantitative assessments of reported concerns were not undertaken in this study.