Abstract
Objectives To co-produce a school-based protocol and examine acceptability and feasibility of collecting saliva samples for genetic studies from young adolescent students in schools for the purpose of mental health research.
Design Protocol co-production and mixed-methods feasibility pilot. Setting: Secondary schools in Wales, UK.
Participants Year 7 and 8 secondary school students (aged 11-13 years) from schools in the School Health Research Network.
Primary and secondary outcome measures Co-produced research protocol including an interactive science workshop delivered in schools; school, parental and student recruitment rates; adherence to protocol and adverse events; ability to extract and genotype saliva samples; student enjoyment of the science workshop; and teacher views of acceptability and feasibility (qualitative analysis of focus groups).
Results Five schools participated in the co-production phase, and three of these took part in the research study. Four further schools were approached subsequently, but none participated. The eligible sample in the three participating schools included 868 children. Parental opt-in consent was received from 98 parents (11.3% eligible sample), three parents (0.3%) actively refused and responses were not received for 767 (88.4%) parents. Of those providing opt-in consent, we obtained saliva samples plus consent for data linkage for 79 (80.6%) students. Only one sample was unable to be genotyped due to insufficient quantity of saliva. Feedback on the study protocol showed that the science workshop was viewed as valuable by schools and received positive feedback from students. Feedback from teachers showed that undertaking research like this in schools is viewed as acceptable in principle, potentially feasible, but that there are important procedural barriers to be overcome. Key recommendations include establishing close working relationships between the research team and school classroom staff, together with improved methods for engaging parents.
Conclusions There are major challenges to undertaking large scale genetic mental health research in schools. Such research may be acceptable in principle, and in practice DNA collected using classroom based saliva sampling is of sufficient quality for extraction and genotyping. However, key challenges that must be overcome are ensuring representative recruitment of schools and sufficient parental engagement. Integration of a science workshop with curriculum fit was viewed as positive but was highly resource intensive.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This is the first study to test the feasibility and acceptability of collecting genetic samples in secondary schools and obtaining consent for linkage to questionnaire and record-based mental health data.
A key strength is co-production of the research protocol with stakeholders (young people, parents/guardians, schools).
We used a mixed-methods approach to assess the feasibility and acceptability of carrying out genetic research studies of mental health in schools.
This pilot study was conducted in three mainstream secondary schools in Wales, UK. Therefore it is not clear whether findings are transferrable to a wider section of schools in Wales and other countries, education systems and age groups.
It was not possible to collect data on the reasons for return or non-return of parental consent.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a UK Medical Research Council Mental Health Data Pathfinder grant (MC_PC_17212). The work was undertaken with the support of The Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Joint funding (MR/KO232331/1) from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the Welsh Government and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged. The work was undertaken with support from the Public Health Improvement Research Network (PHIRN). PHIRN is part of the National Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research funded by Health and Care Research Wales, Welsh Government
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by Cardiff University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (ref 18/57).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available upon reasonable request.
