Abstract
Objectives We compared nurse practitioner-led care and physician trainees-led care on patients’ length of stay in a secondary emergency department in Japan.
Methods This observational research utilized a secondary data analysis of medical records. Participants (N = 1,419; mean age = 63.9 ± 23.4 years; 52.3% men) were patients who were transferred to the emergency department by an ambulance between April 2016 and March 2018 in western Tokyo. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed with the length of stay as the dependent variable and the factors related to the length of stay, including medical care leaders, as the independent variable to compare Japanese nurse practitioner-led care and physician trainees-led care on patients’ length of stay.
Results Approximately half of the patients (n = 763; 53.8%) received Japanese nurse practitioner-led care. Patients’ length of stay was significantly shorter by six minutes in the Japanese nurse practitioner-led care group than the physician trainees-led care group.
Conclusion Patients’ length of stay was significantly shorter by six minutes in the Japanese nurse practitioner group than the physician trainees’ group. This time difference suggests that the medical care led by Japanese nurse practitioners is more efficient. In the future, the cost-effectiveness of Japanese nurse practitioner medical care, safety, and patient satisfaction should be examined in a multi-institutional joint study.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors declare no external funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
the Institutional Review Board of the National Disaster Medical Center (no. 2018-24) The Research Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi (no. 2072)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Removed line numbers from the text. Moved the table from the text to after the references
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [KU] upon reasonable request.
