Abstract
Background The efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains controversial.
Methods We conducted a multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients with at least one of the following risk factors for worsening: age ≥75 years, age between 60 and 74 years, and presence of at least one comorbidity, or need for supplemental oxygen (≤3 L/min). Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 800mg hydroxychloroquine on Day 0 followed by 400mg per day for 8 days or a placebo. The primary endpoint was a composite of death or tracheal intubation within 14 days following randomization. Secondary endpoints included mortality and clinical evolution at Day 14 and 28, viral shedding at Day 5 and 10.
Results The trial was stopped after 250 patients were included due to a slowdown of the pandemic in France. The intention-to-treat population comprised 123 and 124 patients in the placebo and hydroxychloroquine groups, respectively. The median age was 77 years and 151 patients required oxygen therapy. The primary endpoint occurred in nine patients in the hydroxychloroquine group and eight patients in the placebo group (relative risk 1.12; 95% confidence interval 0.45– 2.80; P=0.82). No difference was observed between the two groups in any of the secondary endpoints.
Conclusion In this trial involving mainly older patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, patients treated with hydroxychloroquine did not experience better clinical or virological outcomes than those receiving the placebo.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier : NCT04325893
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health through a national call for proposals for therapeutic trials on COVID-19. The trial also received an exceptional donation from the Pays de la Loire region and from the Angers Loire Metropole conurbation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Sponsor obtained approval from the Comite de Protection des Personnes du Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer 4 (No CPP2020-03-036 / 2020-001271-33 / 20.03.24.72431) and from the Agence Nationale de Securite du Medicament et des produits de sante (ANSM; No MEDAECNAT-2020-03-00045).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
A complete list of investigators (HYCOVID study group) is available in the Supplementary appendix.
Conflict of interest statement: All author: none in relation to this work.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier : NCT04325893 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04325893)
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
6
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
2
Blogs/Media
Author Videos