ABSTRACT
Background Approximately half of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) also meet criteria for internalizing disorders, yet few studies assess reciprocal longitudinal relations among these symptoms.
Methods We used longitudinal causal discovery in a veteran cohort for hypothesis-generation about PTSD and internalizing symptom drivers (n=240), followed by hypothesis-testing in two independent civilian cohorts with similar symptom assessments over time (n=79 and n=116).
Results In the veteran cohort, causal discovery revealed PTSD symptoms drove internalizing symptoms, which subsequently impacted social functioning; all independent of problematic alcohol use. This replicated in treatment-seeking anxiety disorders (AD, n = 79) and substance abuse (SA, n = 116) samples with significantly better model fit for PTSD symptoms driving internalizing symptoms, versus internalizing symptoms driving PTSD symptoms (BIC change for AD sample = 175.1, p<.001; BIC change for SA sample = 571.6, p<.001). We also found better model fit with PTSD symptoms driving anxiety symptoms, versus anxiety symptoms driving PTSD symptoms (BIC change for AD sample = 71.8, p < .001; BIC change for SA sample = 568.9, p < .001). Posthoc analysis in the veteran sample revealed that hyperarousal and cognitive and affective disturbance bridged between other PTSD symptoms and internalizing symptoms.
Conclusions Our findings suggest that internalizing symptoms that emerge in the context of PTSD are more likely to be driven by PTSD symptoms. These results highlight the need for a PTSD- and trauma-informed approach to treating internalizing symptoms, and provide preliminary evidence for cognition and mood disruption as a factor driving comorbidity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
The present study is based on secondary data from the Mind Your Heart study, a prospective study of individuals receiving care through the veterans affairs system. The Mind Your Heart Study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23 HL 094765-0), the Irene Perstein Foundation, and the University of California, San Francisco. This project was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through UCSF-CTSI Grant Number UL1 TR000004.
Funding Statement
Funding directly in support of this project was provided by the National Institute of Mental Health, through grant number 1R01MH116156-01A1 entitled "Bioinformatics for Post-Traumatic Stress.” The Mind Your Heart Study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23 HL 094765-0), the Irene Perstein Foundation, and the University of California, San Francisco. This project was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through UCSF-CTSI Grant Number UL1 TR000004.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Minnesota, study ID: STUDY00003370. Contact information for the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board are provided below: Address: 200 Oak Street S.E. Suite 350-2 Minneapolis, MN 55455 Email: irb{at}umn.edu Phone: (612) 626-5654
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos