Follow this preprint

Assessment of authors understanding of the STROBE-nut reporting guidelines

Dana Hawwash, Michelle Seck, Elisa Quaranta, Patrick Kolsteren, Carl Lachat
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.15.20211268
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.

Data Availability

Anonymised data is added as Annex 5.

Back to top
Posted October 20, 2020.
Download PDF
Print/Save Options
Download PDFFull Text & In-line FiguresXML

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Assessment of authors understanding of the STROBE-nut reporting guidelines
Dana Hawwash, Michelle Seck, Elisa Quaranta, Patrick Kolsteren, Carl Lachat
medRxiv 2020.10.15.20211268; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.15.20211268
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area

Reviews and Context

0

Comment

0

TRIP Peer Reviews

0

Community Reviews

0

Automated Services

0

Blogs/Media

0

Author Videos

You can now receive automatic notifications when a preprint is revised, withdrawn, commented on, peer reviewed, or published in a journal. Select the events you would like to follow below and click "Submit". To see all of the preprints you are currently following, please go to the medRxiv Alerts Page.

Sign In to Follow this Preprint

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.