Article Information
History
- November 9, 2020.
Article Versions
- Version 1 (October 18, 2020 - 06:33).
- Version 2 (October 18, 2020 - 12:18).
- You are currently viewing Version 3 of this article (November 9, 2020 - 11:01).
- Version 4 (December 5, 2020 - 18:54).
- Version 5 (December 12, 2020 - 00:31).
- Version 6 (January 25, 2021 - 14:30).
- Version 7 (March 15, 2021 - 10:01).
- View Version 8, the most recent version of this article.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
REVISION SUMMARY
We found errors in the calibration process using the no intervention scenario that had led to a lower early Rt than intended. We have addressed that issue and updated the results. We have also extended the ranges of the Uniform distributions for the asymptomatic variables.
Author Information
- Edward M. Hill*,
- Benjamin D. Atkins,
- Matt J. Keeling,
- Michael J. Tildesley and
- Louise Dyson
- The Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology & Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
- ↵* Corresponding Author. Email: Edward.Hill{at}warwick.ac.uk