ABSTRACT
The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is a global threat presenting health, economic and social challenges that continue to escalate. Meta-population epidemic modeling studies in the susceptible-exposed-infectious-removed (SEIR) style have played important roles in informing public health and shaping policy making to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. These models typically rely on a key assumption on the homogeneity of the population. This assumption certainly cannot be expected to hold true in real situations; various geographic, socioeconomic and cultural environments affect the behaviors that drive the spread of COVID-19 in different communities. What’s more, variation of intra-county environments creates spatial heterogeneity of transmission in different sub-regions. To address this issue, we develop a new human mobility flow-augmented stochastic SEIR-style epidemic modeling framework with the ability to distinguish different regions and their corresponding behavior. This new modeling framework is then combined with data assimilation and machine learning techniques to reconstruct the historical growth trajectories of COVID-19 confirmed cases in two counties in Wisconsin. The associations between the spread of COVID-19 and human mobility, business foot-traffic, race & ethnicity, and age-group are then investigated. The results reveal that in a college town (Dane County) the most important heterogeneity is spatial, while in a large city area (Milwaukee County) ethnic heterogeneity becomes more apparent. Scenario studies further indicate a strong response of the spread rate on various reopening policies, which suggests that policymakers may need to take these heterogeneities into account very carefully when designing policies for mitigating the spread of COVID-19 and reopening.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
We would like to thank the SafeGraph Inc. for providing the anonymous and aggregated place visits and human mobility flow data. S.G., Q.L., K.C, and J.P. acknowledge the funding support provided by the National Science Foundation (Award No. BCS-2027375). J.E. acknowledge the funding support provided by the National Science Foundation (Award No. DMS-1700884). Q.L., N.C. and X.H. are also supported by Data Science Initiative, provided by the University of Wisconsin ‐ Madison Office of the Chancellor and the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Only aggregated data are used in this study and IRB exempted for this research.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The official testing results of COVID-19 confirmed cases between March 11, 2020 and August 12, 2020 were obtained from the local COVID-19 Dashboards, created by the Public Health Offices of City of Madison & Dane County (https://publichealthmdc.com/coronavirus) and Milwaukee County (https://county.milwaukee.gov/EN/COVID-19). The census-tract level geographic boundaries with demographics and socioeconomic attributes were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau. We collected points of interest (POIs) with aggregated foot-traffic information from SafeGraph. For each POI, the records of aggregated visitor patterns record the number of unique visitors and the number of total visits to each venue during a specified time window (i.e., hourly, weekly, and monthly); this allows us to estimate the foot-traffic of each venue and the origin-to-destination (O-D) spatial interaction flow patterns during the the study period (https://github.com/GeoDS/COVID19USFlows). We further aggregate the O-D flow matrices to the census-tract level to match the COVID-19 testing data.
