Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition driven by a multifactorial etiology. We employed a machine learning (ML) based algorithm and the wealth of information offered by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database to investigate the relative contribution of clinically relevant factors for identifying subjects affected by Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), a transitional status between healthy aging and dementia. Our ML-based Random Forest (RF) algorithm did not help predict clinical outcomes and the AD conversion of MCI subjects. On the other hand, non-converting (ncMCI) subjects were correctly classified and predicted. Two neuropsychological tests, the FAQ and ADAS13, were the most relevant features used for the classification and prediction of younger, under 70, ncMCI subjects. Structural MRI data combined with systemic parameters and the cardiovascular status were instead the most critical factors for the classification of over 70 ncMCI subjects. Our results support the notion that AD is not an organ-specific condition and results from pathological processes inside and outside the Central Nervous System.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the Alzheimer's Association Part the Cloud: Translational Research Funding for Alzheimer's Disease (PTC) PTC-19-602325 and the Alzheimer's Association - GAAIN Exploration to Evaluate Novel Alzheimer's Queries (GEENA-Q-19-596282) (SLS). AG is supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement iMIND No. 841665.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Data were obtained upon permission from the public ADNI database (last protocol update 10/17/2019). The ADNI study is conducted according to Good Clinical Practice guidelines, US 21CFR Part 50 Protection of Human Subjects, and Part 56 Institutional Review Boards(IRBs) / Research Ethics Boards (REBs), and pursuant to state and federal HIPAA regulations. Phone consents was obtained for all prescreening procedures and written informed consent for the study was obtained from all participants and/or authorized representatives and the study partners before in person assessments were carried out (in accordance with US 21 CFR 50.25, the Tri Council Policy Statement). All the procedures employed in the ADNI study are in compliance with national and international regulations.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos