Abstract
Background Exploring the congruence of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) evaluation provides valuable information regarding whether proxies can accurately reflect patient perceptions and the quality of symptom communication. It is particular important in advanced cancer population who experience poor HRQOL and have deteriorated ability to express their feeling. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the congruence of HRQOL reports between patient-physician and patient-caregiver dyads and to determine the association of variables, if any, with the congruence between dyads.
Methods This observational study with a cross-sectional design first approached physicians who provided care for patients with advanced cancer at the participating institution. Then, participated physicians’ patients and their caregivers were recruited. All participants were required to independently fill out an HRQOL questionnaire during their outpatient visits. Descriptive statistics, weighted kappa, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and linear regression were employed for data analysis.
Results A total of 52 patient-physician and 27 patient-caregiver dyads were examined. Patients suffered from considerable problems in all three HRQOL domains: symptom, functioning, and overall HRQOL. The patients’ level of agreement was moderate with the caregivers and fair with the physicians. A significant relationship was found between several patient-related variables and disagreement.
Conclusion The study’s patient group experienced a compromised HRQOL, warranting immediate attention. When there are barriers to obtaining a patient’s self-repot, clinicians may consider caregivers as reasonable source. Some patients with special characteristics may need additional attention because their problems may be at greater risk of being overlooked.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research is funded by Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, grant number: MOST 107-2314-B-002-283-MY2.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the National Taiwan University Hospital Human Subjects Office Institutional Review Board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding statement: This research is funded by Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, grant number: MOST 107-2314-B-002-283-MY2.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
