Abstract
School and college reopening-closure policies are considered one of the most promising non-pharmaceutical interventions for mitigating infectious diseases. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of these policies is still debated, largely due to the lack of empirical evidence on behavior during implementation. We examined U.S. college reopenings’ association with changes in human mobility within campuses and in COVID-19 incidence in the counties of the campuses over a ten-week period around college reopenings. We used an integrative framework, with a difference-in-differences design comparing areas with a college campus, before and after reopening, to areas without a campus and a Bayesian approach to estimate the daily reproductive number (Rt). We found that college reopenings were associated with increased campus mobility, and increased COVID-19 incidence by 2.7 cases per 100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4 – 4.0), of which 0.042 per 100,000 resulted in death (95% CI: 0.002 – 0.082). This reflected our estimate of increased transmission locally after re-opening. A greater increase in county COVID-19 incidence resulted from campuses that opened for in-person (vs. online) teaching and with greater exposure to students from counties with high COVID-19-incidence in the weeks before reopening. Our study sheds light on movement and social mixing patterns during the closure-reopening of colleges and offers strategic instruments for benefit-cost analyses of future school reopening/closure policies.
Significance Statement College campuses represent a challenge for COVID-19 mitigation efforts. Mixing behavior associated with communal living, nationwide student migration, and few assessments of spillover effects on surrounding communities make reopening campuses for in-person instruction controversial. Our study uses mobility as a proxy for migration and mixing behavior in campus communities before and after reopening. Using college reopening plans and cell phone mobility data, we evaluate county-level age-structured COVID-19 transmission evolution and mortality due to campus teaching modality. We find substantial increases in mobility and cases across all modalities and increased deaths associated with primarily in-person instruction. These findings suggest leaders of communal living environments should plan around COVID-19 incidence in their vicinity and the areas from which they draw community members.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro IRB determined that this study was exempt from further review.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data Availability
We are not permitted to redistribute the mobility or case data that we use in our analysis. However, it is readily available from SafeGraph and the CDC for academic researchers.
