LOW PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AMONG MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN (MSM) DURING THE SHELTER-IN-PLACE ORDERS TO PREVENT THE COVID-19 SPREAD: RESULTS FROM A NATIONWIDE STUDY

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic is configured as the century’s health challenge. More than 60 million people had been infected worldwide by the end of November 2020 (WHO, 2020), and its impact is apparent in all countries. The populations’ psychosocial health has been considerably affected (Serafini et al., 2020), especially among those more intensively affected by the virus, such as the homeless; migrants and refugees; the elderly; drug users; and indigenous populations (Xiong, et al, 2020). Brazil is currently facing a disheartening situation. It ranks third in the number of COVID-19 cases; by the end of November, it recorded more than 170,000 deaths (Brazil, 2020).

The COVID-19 pandemic context has affected daily life, imposing changes beyond the health sphere, as social, economic, cultural, and political aspects have been impacted with no precedent in the recent history of epidemics (Chakraborty & Maity, 2020). A large number of people infected and dead directly impacts the health systems’ capacity, also challenging the countries’ economy and the populations in general (Araújo, Oliveira & Freitas, 2020). Continuous and prolonged quarantine causes a strain on people’s mental health, as it restricts access to essential goods, such as food, medicines, and transportation, among others (Oliveira et al., 2020). Such a context affects the individuals’ psychological well-being, significantly decreasing quality of life (Serafini et al., 2020). These problems are heightened by mandatory social isolation measures intended to control the virus spread. The damage caused to human well-being is undeniable and has drawn the attention of researchers, lawmakers, health authorities, and public managers, intending to minimize the impact.

The pandemic’s harmful impact, heightened by social isolation, on the individuals’ physical, mental, social, and environmental spheres, is quite noticeable (Forte, Favieri, Tambelli & Casagrande, 2020). In this context, sexual and gender minorities are subject to greater vulnerability, given the historically conditioning inequality they face in terms of health and violence (Gibb et al, 2020). That is, these groups are relegated to a marginal position within the society, and, as a consequence, a safety net system and psychosocial support are not always provided or available to them.

The results reported by a global survey performed by Hornet (Greenhalgh, 2020), a Gay social network, commissioned by the Thomson Reuters Foundation to be conducted among men who have sex with men (MSM), reveal considerable levels of loneliness and depression associated with shelter-in-place measures, emphasizing their broader impact on the individuals’ mental health, which may imply greater impairment in terms of psychological and social well-being throughout the pandemic. The literature has addressed the pandemic’s impact on the maintenance of affective and sexual practices, including the establishment of barriers impeding access to health services, necessary to maintain therapeutic processes and care technologies (Sousa, Oliveira, Schneider, Queiroz, Carvalho, Fronteira, 2020; Carvalho, et al, 2020; Torres et al., 2020). From this perspective, there is a lack of concrete governmental actions directed to MSM during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Given this population’s context, coupled with the repercussions of the novel socio-historical phenomenon caused by the COVID-19 worldwide on the individuals’ psychological well-being, this study’s objective was to analyze the factors associated with low psychological well-being among MSM living in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Data analysis

Data Analysis and Statistical Software (STATA), version 12.0 was used for data analysis. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used. Bivariate analysis was performed using the Chi-square test, estimating prevalence and crude prevalence ratio (PR) with a 95% confidence interval.

Multivariate analysis was performed using Poisson’s Regression analysis with robust variation. The outcome variable (psychological well-being) was included in the analysis, along with each of the associated independent variables with p-value≤0.20. The stepwise procedure was used. The sequence in which each term was inserted in the model was determined by a mutual analysis of theoretical relevance criteria and statistical significance obtained in the bivariate analysis. Each term was added or removed from the model after identifying statistical significance (p-value<0.05), stability of power of association, and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), defining the useful subset of terms. All the variables with a 5% statistical significance remained in the final model. To determine the best final model, the one with the lowest AIC value was selected.

Results

A total of 2,646 men who have sex with men participated, 1,921 (72.6%) of whom were referred by their partners or friends from other social networks. Most men presented moderate psychological well-being (47.7%), followed by those with high well-being (44.4%), while a prevalence ratio of 7.9% experiencing low well-being was found. Most were aged from 18 to 29 years old (69.9%), 31 years old on average (Min. 18 and Max. 60; SD±8.4), single (67.2%), fully complying with shelter-in-place orders (72.1%), with a duration of social isolation between 30 and 45 days (58.1%), and decreased consumption of alcohol (43.1%) (Table 1).

The bivariate analysis of factors associated with psychological well-being showed statistical association with age (p<0.001), relationship status (p<0.001), and social isolation (p<0.001).

Being 18 to 29 years old, in a polyamorous relationship, and not complying with shelter-in-place orders increased three, twice, and seven times, respectively, the prevalence of low psychological well-being. Social isolation increased the frequency of low psychological well-being by 47%. Other findings are presented in Table 2.

The variable ‘type of partner’ was excluded from the multivariate analysis because it presented collinearity with relationship status (VIF=7.37). The association between the presence of COVID-19 symptoms and testing for COVID-19 was not statistically significant but remained in the model as confounding adjustment because the model presented a lower AIC.

The following variables were associated with low psychological well-being: being in the youngest age group (PR: 2.76; CI95%: 1.90-4.01); having a polyamorous relationship (PR: 2.78; CI95%: 1.51-5.11); not complying with social isolation measures (PR: 6.27; CI95%: 4.42-8.87); not using the social media to find partners (PR: 1.63; CI95%: 1.06-2.53); having a higher number of sexual partners (PR: 1.80; CI95%: 1.04-3.11); having reduced the number of sexual partners (PR: 2.67; CI95%: 1.44-4.95); and group sex (PR: 1.82; CI95%: 1.23-2.69) (Table 3).

Discussion

MSM living in Brazil experienced worse well-being during the shelter-in-place orders implemented to restrain the spread of COVID-19, as more than half of the participants presented some level of impairment in terms of psychological well-being. The variables that most frequently contributed to this outcome include social isolation/distancing and variables related to the type of relationship and sexual behavior (not complying with social isolation measures, strategies used to search for sexual partners, number of sexual partners, and group sex, stood out).

The declining indicators of psychological well-being among MSM are worth noting. In a devastating context, such as that of a pandemic, access to psychosocial support networks and the individuals’ socio-affective network is considerably weakened and even absent in some instances, potentially intensifying these individuals’ vulnerability from the perspective of mental health and social well-being. For instance, the sudden rupture in socio-affective networks caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, not having access to nightlife or leisure, not meeting friends and groups of belonging, not having intimate and sexual encounters, not being able to keep affective relationships, and interactions being restricted to the virtual environment or small groups, may be quite challenging.

For this reason, the current pandemic context requires we consider the quality or lack of social interactions and how these situations impact the psychological well-being of people as psychological triggers, such as loneliness, change in routine, abandonment, fear, loss of financial stability, or unemployment, may be intensified (SCHMIDT et al., 2020).

This context is likely to cause anxiety, decision conflicts, decreased self-esteem and interest in life, suicidal behavior, eating and sleep disorders, and abusive alcohol or drug consumption among MSM (Pedrosa et al., 2020; Leung et al., 2020). These individuals may even become involved in practices in which they expose themselves to the Coronavirus for not bearing the prolonged social distancing measures, boredom, and the lack of social interaction with people, or restricted mobility within the cities (Reis de Sousa et al., 2020). Coupled with these is the fact that difficulty in searching for affective and sexual partners during the period of social isolation may also decrease psychological well-being, impacting the health of these men (Sousa & Oliveira et al, 2020; Carvalho et al., 2020).

In this study, a greater prevalence of low psychological well-being was found among MSM who did not report the use of social media to find partners, revealing that even though the social media is considered to be associated with sex, in times of social distancing, it may play a protective role by enabling social interactions, even if remotely. The results from a multi-center study show that 95% of its MSM sample was (totally or partially) complying with social distancing measures, which resulted in a drop in the number of partners and relationships, but, at the same time, increased online interactions (Sousa & Oliveira et al., 2020). The study also reports that MSM devised strategies to keep interactions during the social distancing measures, reinforcing this study’s findings that interactions, whether to seek or exchange content, are essential for MSM’s psychological well-being. The study mentioned above addressed only sexual interactions though, so inferences concerning other types of relationships are impossible.

Interestingly, having a polyamorous relationship (three people or more) was associated with low psychological well-being. One hypothesis is that polyamorous relationships do not always occur under the same roof, implying that those involved may have to deal with distancing measures; that is, they may not contact each other for some time. Additionally, polyamorous relationships allow new people, outside one’s place of shelter and with a possibly different history of exposure, to be included. In the case of physical contact, all those involved are exposed, which results in fear, and decreased psychological well-being.

Consensual non-monogamy or polyamorous relationships have become an increasingly accepted affective and sexual experience, which does not comply with monogamous relationship patterns, usually considered ideal in stable and committed relationships (Costa & Ribeiro, 2020; Jowett, 2020). This context has been intensified among sexual minorities, including MSM. We believe that the fact these individuals are involved in polyamorous relationships and are currently experiencing the impossibility to maintain the frequency of affective and sexual meetings during the pandemic, that is, impaired affective and sexual dynamics are coupled with diminished leisure opportunities these relationships usually promote, decreasing these men’s psychological well-being.

One cannot rule out the fact that MSM in polyamorous relationships have to live with stigma. In the context of this pandemic, this experience may be heightened considering the disruptive phenomena caused by the stigmatization process such as labels, judgment, withdrawing, and discredit, negatively impacting their physical and mental health, and consequently their psychological well-being (Conley, Piemonte, Gusakova & Rubin, 2018; Conley, 2017).

In line with this hypothesis, this study shows that having a higher number of sexual partners and practicing group sex was associated with low psychological well-being, which reinforces the hypothesis that having sex with casual partners implies exposure that includes the risk of acquiring sexually transmissible infections and COVID-19 (Stephenson et al, 2020). Sex is a pleasurable practice to satisfy one’s desire and improves an individual’s general well-being. Group sex, which is usually a source of satisfaction, in a pandemic context, can lead to psychological distress afterward due to a fear of having being infected by COVID-19 (Sousa et al., 2020). Although MSM’s sexual practices incur risks, we have to bear in mind that such practices are diverse and vary in terms of configurations and relationships, requiring a positive approach considering the specificities of each MSM group.

Exposure to often unknown partners, or familiar partners who do not effectively adopt preventive measures, including those against COVID-19, increases the fear of being contaminated or anxiety with the possibility of presenting signs and symptoms of the disease, leading to low psychological well-being (Newman & Guta, 2020; Suen, Chan & Wong, 2020; Brennan, Card, Collict, Jolimore & Lachowsky, 2020).

Considering the disciplinary role of affective and sexual practices, which coupled with the advent of a novel infectious disease, for which an effective treatment or cure has not been devised thus far, keeping multiple sexual partners and/or having group sex may increase the levels of anxiety, stress, uncertainty, worry, and fear among MSM. Additionally, the COVID-19 epidemiological curve in Brazil at the time of data collection was ascending, with an expressive number of new cases and deaths (Silva et al., 2020). Concomitantly, there was an increase in the amount of information provided by the media, exposing the complexity of the disease and virulence of SARS-CoV-2, which also tends to influence the individuals’ psychological well-being negatively (Gao et al, 2020).

The prevalence of low psychological well-being was approximately six times greater among MSM who did not comply or could not comply with the social isolation measures, reinforcing the hypothesis that even though the individuals may not comply with social distancing measures to seek interactions, exposure still may cause concerns (Sousa & Oliveira et al., 2020; Newman & Guta, 2020; This finding should be interpreted with caution because this study did not assess the context in which people violated social isolation measures, socialized with roommates, family, and co-workers, or yet how people interpreted the questions. Additionally, we should consider that seeking social interactions might not be a matter of choice but rather a compulsive behavior, even though it implies decreased psychological well-being afterward (Sanchez et al, 2020).

Nonetheless, having a small number of partners also affected these individuals’ psychological well-being negatively. If, on the one hand, the individuals want to decrease exposure to protect themselves, on the other hand, not having the social support provided by relationships and partners, which would decrease the pandemic’s harmful effects, could negatively affect these individuals’ mental health (Sanchez et al., 2020; Carrico, et al., 2020; Newman & Guta, 2020).

Variation in the number of affective and sexual partners may have influenced and decreased the psychological well-being of MSM and is associated with the low psychosocial support enabled by the measures imposed by Brazilian agencies to protect people or minimize the impact of the pandemic context on mental health. Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate this finding in more detail. In Brazil, stress has been intensified among minority social groups as their ‘invisibility’ has been exposed along with denial of rights, cuts on budgets previously designated to the LGBTQIA+ population, and naturalized institutional homophobia (Folha de São Paulo, 2020).

A lack of directive public policies mainly affects the youngest population, which in this study presented the highest prevalence of low psychological well-being, almost three times higher than among older MSM. The World Health Organization has shown concern with the youngest population within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly because this is the most vulnerable in not adhering to social isolation measures. An increase in the number of new COVID-19 cases, agglomerations, and non-adherence to public health measures to control the spread of Sars-CoV-2, has been found in countries already in the summer season (Young mind, 2020; Cohen & Bosk, 2020).

The Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) has proposed specific guidelines to promote mental health and strengthen psychosocial support in emergencies, as is the case of the COVID-19 pandemic. These guidelines focus on promoting people’s psychological well-being and preventing and/or treating mental diseases (IASC, 2007). These goals are achieved by employing multiple approaches that take into account biological, sociocultural, educational, and community characteristics, which should focus on reducing harm, promoting human rights and equality, social participation, and valorization of local resources and competencies, the work via integrated support systems, and rehabilitation (Dong, Du, & Gardner, 2020; Fukuti et al., 2020).

Socio-affective networks are a significant source of access to protection, sociability, exchange, and maintenance of MSM’s psychological well-being and health. In the pandemic context, and even after the pandemic, supporting, strengthening, and disseminating these networks may be an effective strategy to improve the levels of psychological well-being, decreasing the impact caused by social isolation, such as feelings of loneliness, heightened anxiety, and stress.

This study’s limitations include its design. Cross-sectional studies do not allow for cause and effect conclusions; that is, longitudinal studies would allow for better evidence of associations. Additionally, due to the need to comply with social distancing measures, population-based face-to-face interviews were not possible, except for the MSM who did not have access to the Internet and could not complete the electronic form. Finally, a probabilistic sampling procedure was not adopted here, which impedes the generalization of results to other contexts or countries, though the results provide a situational diagnosis of the MSM’s psychological well-being in the pandemic context.

Conclusion

The factors associated with the MSM’s low psychological well-being were: belonging to the youngest age group; being in a polyamorous relationship; not complying with the social isolation measures; not using social media to find partners; having multiple sexual partners; having reduced the number of partners, and group sex.

The planning and implementation of public policies and actions to promote psychological well-being and mental health in general, intended to increase resilience among MSM are needed. Safe sexual strategies and behavior need to be promoted, along with the use of digital technologies to facilitate social relationships by enabling remote interactions. These measures can alleviate the harmful effects of the intensified psychological needs accruing from the pandemic context, social isolation measures, and maladaptive coping strategies.

Compliance with Ethical Standards