ABSTRACT
Background Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality are evident in all high-income countries and ongoing monitoring is recommended using linked census-mortality data. Using such data, we provide first estimates of education-related inequalities in cause-specific mortality in Australia, suitable for international comparisons.
Methods Using Australian Census (2016) linked to 13-months of Death Registrations data (2016-17), we estimated relative rates (RR) and rate differences (RD, per100 000 person-years), comparing rates in low (no qualifications) and intermediate (secondary school) with high education (tertiary), for individual causes of death (among those 25-84y) and grouped according to preventability (25-74y), separately by sex and age group, adjusting for age, using negative binomial regression.
Results Among 13.9M people contributing 14 452 732 person-years, 84 743 deaths occurred. We observed inequalities in most causes of death for each age-sex group. Among men aged 25-44y, absolute and relative inequalities (low versus high education) were largest for injuries, e.g. transport accidents (RR=10.1 [95%CI: 5.4-18.7], RD=21.1 [15.9-26.3]). Among those aged 45-64y, inequalities were greatest for chronic diseases, e.g. lung cancer (men RR=6.6 [4.9-8.9], RD=55.6 [51.1-60.1]) and ischaemic heart disease (women RR=5.8 [3.7-9.1], RD=19.2 [17.0-21.5]), with similar patterns for people aged 65-84y. When grouped according to preventability, inequalities were large for causes amenable to behaviour change and medical intervention for all ages and causes amenable to injury prevention among young men.
Conclusions Australian education-related inequalities in mortality are substantial, generally higher than international estimates, and related to preventability. Findings highlight opportunities to reduce them and the potential to improve the health of the population.
Key messagesUsing linked Australian Census (2016) and Death Registrations data (2016-17), we provide the first estimates of education-related inequalities in cause-specific mortality for Australia, broadly suitable for international comparisons.
Among men aged 25-44 years, inequalities were largest for injuries, with mortality rates among those with low education six-to-ten times that of those with high education. Among the mid- and older-age groups, inequalities were largest for chronic diseases, where mortality rates among those with the lowest education were between two- and seven-times those with the highest education.
In 2016-17, around half of all deaths for men and one-third of deaths for women aged 25-84 were associated with less than tertiary education. The majority of these excess deaths were attributable to leading causes.
The substantial inequalities seen in preventable deaths highlight ongoing opportunities to reduce inequalities in mortality and to improve the overall health of the Australian population.
Australian estimates are generally consistent with, but higher than, those for comparable countries and earlier time periods, but further standardisation of methods and reporting would enhance the validity of such comparisons
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Partnership Project Grant (grant number 1134707), in conjunction with the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and the National Heart Foundation of Australia.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee (reference 2016/666)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.