Abstract
In response to the Covid-19 outbreak the Italian Government imposed an economic lockdown on March 22, 2020 and ordered the closing of all non-essential economic activities. This paper estimates the causal effects of this measure on mortality by Covid-19 and on mobility patterns. The identification of the causal effects exploits the variation in the active population across municipalities induced by the economic lockdown. The difference-in-differences empirical design compares outcomes in municipalities above and below the median variation in the share of active population before and after the lockdown within a province, also controlling for municipality-specific dynamics, daily-shocks at the provincial level and municipal unobserved characteristics. Our results show that the intensity of the economic lockdown is associated with a statistically significant reduction in mortality by Covid-19 and, in particular, for age groups between 40-64 and older (with larger and more significant effects for individuals above 50). Back of the envelope calculations indicate that 4,793 deaths were avoided, in the 26 days between April 5 to April 30, in the 3,518 municipalities which experienced a more intense lockdown. Several robustness checks corroborate our empirical findings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
We received no external funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The paper only used public available data. As such the project did not involve any intervention with human subjects and thus did not require IRB approval.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
* We are also grateful to Alberto Bisin, Daniela Iorio and Simona Grassi for useful comments. We also thank Ruben Durante and Elliot Gaston Motte for their help in gathering the EnelX mobility data and Facebook which provided data on human mobility through its “Data for Good” program.
13 Accordingly, we also do not use the variation in the share of active population as an instrument for the differential change in mobility because there are several potential violations of the exclusion restriction. The economic lockdown may affect mortality by Covid-19 through the changes in behavior (for example the use of masks), human interactions (for example spending more time at home), and expectations that are unrelated to mobility. Hence, we see mobility as an important but not unique channel through which the economic lockdown reduced mortality by Covid-19.
Data Availability
All data are publicly available
