Abstract
Objectives To determine how participants perceived telehealth consults in comparison to traditional in-person visits, and to investigate whether people believe that telehealth services would be useful beyond the pandemic.
Design A national cross-sectional community survey.
Participants Australian adults aged 18 years and over (n=1369).
Main outcome measures Telehealth experiences.
Results Of the 596 telehealth users, the majority of respondents (62%) rated their telehealth experience as “just as good” or “better” than a traditional in-person medical appointment. On average, respondents perceived that telehealth would be moderately to very useful for medical appointments after the COVID-19 pandemic is over (M=3.67 out of 5, SD=1.1). Being male (p=0.007), having a history of both depression and anxiety (p=0.037), or lower patient activation (individuals’ willingness to take on the role of managing their health/healthcare) (p=0.037) were associated with a poorer telehealth experience. Six overarching themes were identified from free-text responses of why telehealth experience was poorer than a traditional in-person medical appointment: communication is not as effective; limitations with technology; issues with obtaining prescriptions and pathology; reduced confidence in doctor; additional burden for complex care; and inability to be physically examined.
Conclusions Telehealth appointments were reported to be comparable to traditional in-person medical appointments by most of our sample. Telehealth should continue to be offered as a mode of healthcare delivery while the pandemic continues and may be worthwhile beyond the pandemic.
The knownThe COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an increase in telehealth services.
The majority of telehealth users (62%) perceived their experience to be just as good or better than traditional in-person medical care; and that telehealth would be at least somewhat useful beyond the pandemic.
Having a history of both depression and anxiety was associated with a poorer telehealth experience and in-person visits were frequently preferred over telehealth visits for mental health appointments.
Telehealth should continue to be offered while the COVID-19 pandemic continues and may be worthwhile beyond the pandemic, however, telehealth may be less effective for mental health services.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2020/212).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available upon reasonable request.
