Abstract
Purpose As for pathologic N category, various regrouping strategies have been raised in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but little was done in small cell lung cancer(SCLC). On the basis of the suggestions discussed in NSCLC, we proposed a novel, metastatic lymph node station number (MNSN) - based pathologic N parameter and compared its efficacy in predicting survival with pN in SCLC.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed the patients operated and pathologically diagnosed as SCLC in our hospital between 2009 and 2019. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to compare survival between groups defined by pN and MNSN.
Results From 2009 to 2019, 566 patients received surgery for SCLC and 530 of them were eligible for subsequent analysis, with a median follow-up time of 21 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 58.8%, 38.6%, 27.9% for pN0, pN1, pN2 stages and were 58.8%, 36.8%, 22.1%, 0% for MNSN0, 1-2, 3-5, 6-7 groups, respectively. Analyses of overall and recurrence-free survival (RFS) revealed that pN1 could not be distinguished from pN2 (OS, p = 0.099; RFS, p = 0.254), but the groups in MNSN were well separated from each other (OS, p< 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.063; RFS, p< 0.001, p = 0.026, p = 0.01, compared with the former group). When adjusted for sex, age, smoking, tumor purity and T stage, MNSN groups were independent hazard factors for OS and RFS.
Conclusions Based on our cohort study, the MNSN-based N parameter might be a better indicator to predict survival than pN in SCLC and worth considering in the definition of N category in the future.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 81972172], the Shanghai Hospital Development Center [Grant No. SHDC12018122], the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [Grant No. 19XD1423200], and Programs of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital [No. fkcx1904].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics Committee Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.
