ABSTRACT
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) lacks reliable biomarkers that predict disease evolution on an individual basis, potentially leading to over- and undertreatment. Deep neural networks learn from former experiences on a large scale and can be used to predict future events as a potential tool for personalized clinical assistance.
Objective To investigate deep learning for the prediction of individual disease activity in RA.
Methods Demographic and disease characteristics from over 9500 patients and 65.000 visits from the Swiss Quality Management (SCQM) database were used to train and evaluate an adaptive recurrent neural network (AdaptiveNet). Patient and disease characteristics along with clinical and patient reported outcomes, laboratory values and medication were used as input features. DAS28-BSR was used to predict active disease and future numeric individual disease activity by classification and regression, respectively.
Results AdaptiveNet predicted active disease defined as DAS28-BSR>2.6 at the next visit with an overall accuracy of 75.6% and a sensitivity and specificity of 84.2% and 61.5%, respectively. Regression allowed forecasting individual DAS28-BSR values with a mean squared error of 0.9, corresponding to a variation between predicted and true values at next visit of 8%. Apart from DAS28-BSR, the most influential characteristics to predict disease activity were joint pain, disease duration, age and duration of treatment. Longer disease duration, age >50 years or antibody positivity marginally improved prediction performance.
Conclusion Deep neural networks have the capacity to predict individual numeric disease activity in RA. Low specificity remains challenging and might benefit from alternative input data or outcome targets.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding was obtained for this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study was approved by the the regional Ethical committee in Lausanne, Switzerland (ID number 2020-00033).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data can be obtained by the corresponding author.
