COVID-19: Impact on the health and wellbeing of ex-serving personnel (Veterans-CHECK) protocol paper

Context

The COVID-19 pandemic raises many questions not only on biological, but also behavioural, emotional and social responses to a global threat with unknown long-term health impacts (PHOSP-COVID, 2020). Key questions include how to help people maintain unusual behaviours like social distancing or self-isolation or quarantine over many weeks, how best to provide key messages to promote health, and how to minimise the psychological and physical harms of the pandemic – including the impact of isolation, traumatic experience of illness and bereavement, and longer term economic threats (GOV.UK, 2020, LGA, 2020). There are many policy relevant questions for national and international health responses to COVID-19 concerning the general population as well as specific groups of individuals that may have different risk profiles or behaviours, such as black, ethnic and minority groups (Aldridge et al., 2020), older age or vulnerable adults (Brooke and Jackson, 2020), and in the specific case of our study, the ex-service population.

As identified by Davis et al. (2020), to be able to engage with these questions, studies are needed that can rapidly collect data, engage with participants longitudinally, utilising web-based platforms for recruitment and data collection that avoids face-to-face contact in pandemics, whilst needing research that samples from populations where characteristics are known to minimise biases found in convenience samples.

The ex-service population are an estimated population of 2.4 million in Great Britain making up 5% of household residents aged 16 and over (MOD, 2019). Ex-service personnel are a valuable population of interest to Government and the nation, because of commitments enshrined in the Armed Forces Covenant to ensure the Armed Forces community is not disadvantaged compared to the general population, due to their Service (MOD, 2011). Through the KCMHR Health and Wellbeing Study of UK Armed Forces, a large proportion of participants have been followed up since 2003, with three waves of data collected on their health and wellbeing over the period 2003–2016 (Hotopf et al., 2006, Fear et al., 2010, Stevelink et al., 2018). This study focuses on ex-service personnel in this survey, who at a minimum participated in the third wave of data collection of the study 2014–2016. This continuing data will provide evidence in trends of health outcomes of this population.

Current knowledge

This pandemic is unprecedented and is without previous historical data. A recent paper published by leading academics, funders and people with lived experiences (Holmes et al., 2020), identifies that research must investigate as a priority the adverse effects of the pandemic on the mental health of different populations to inform public health and policy responses.

Recently published COVID-19 studies in the UK general population suggest the pandemic is having negative impacts in terms of inequality (Wright et al., 2020), self-harm and suicidal ideation (Iob et al., 2020) and potential distress caused by quarantine (Brooks et al., 2020). We currently have little health and wellbeing information on important sub-groups within the UK general population and their experience of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ex-serving military personnel provide an important population to study, as their attitudes and behaviours may differ from the civilian population during the COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast to the general population (excluding emergency responders), military personnel are trained to demonstrate readiness and resilience in the face of the increasingly fast-paced nature of warfare operations and stressful environments, being able to maintain optimal cognitive and physical performance necessary for success (Nindl et al., 2018). Having left the military, ex-service personnel remain a unique, multifaceted population with a distinct culture that includes values, selfless duty, codes of conduct, and obedience to command (Olenick et al., 2015). However, transition experiences from military to civilian life vary greatly among ex-service personnel and part of this population face major barriers, including mental and physical health issues along with help-seeking barriers due to their needs (Stevelink et al., 2018, Murphy and Busuttil, 2019). Additional key barriers facing the ex-service community can include employment (Carolan, 2019), finances and housing (RBL, 2014), alcohol misuse (Irizar et al., 2020) and gambling (Roberts et al., 2020).

The Veterans-CHECK study will address some of the unanswered questions about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the ex-service population. The study will provide evidence for the Government, OVA and ex-service stakeholders, such as Armed Forces charities, to help shape policy and support services to minimise any negative impact on the ex-service community, and as such fulfil commitments enshrined within the Armed Forces Covenant. This study will be able to compare outcomes with previous study data collected in 2014–2016 and will be able to compare outcomes with COVID-19 studies in the general population, as well as with international ex-service populations in allied countries. The intent is that these individuals would also be followed up in more waves of data collection, and therefore it is possible these outcomes will be able to be compared into the future to assess impact and trends.

Research aims

This study is an exploratory study and therefore does not posit hypotheses. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the current experiences and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, wellbeing and lifestyle behaviours of ex-serving military personnel. This is a quantitative project which will focus on these key areas of interest, aiming to identify potential emerging issues in this population and psychological indicators of resilience and vulnerability.

Secondary aims include comparisons with health and lifestyle behaviours of ex-serving personnel before the COVID-19 pandemic, and with groups in the general population, for example other occupational groups, such as KCL or NHS staff (i.e., using the pseudonymised datasets of KCL CHECK (https://kcl-check.org/) and NHS CHECK (https://www.nhscheck.org/) research projects).

Study protocol

Measures

Specific measures will be used to capture participants’ health and wellbeing status and lifestyle behaviours:

• 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to screen for general (non-psychotic) psychiatric morbidity (Goldberg and Blackwell, 1970).

• 20-item PCL-5 to explore post-traumatic stress disorder (Weathers et al., 2013).

• 7-item Anger DAR-R to assess problematic anger (Forbes et al., 2004).

• 14-item Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) to enable the monitoring of subjective well-being and psychological functioning compared to the general population (all items are worded positively and address aspects of positive mental health) (Tennant et al., 2007).

• 10-item Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) to measure alcohol consumption and misuse (Babor et al., 2001).

• 3-item Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised (CIS-R) suicidal ideation/self-harm (Lewis et al., 1992)

• 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale to measure feelings of isolation and loneliness (Hughes et al., 2004).

• 6-item Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU) to measure participants’ perceptions of social support during the COVID-19 pandemic (Kliem et al., 2015)

• 3-item Problem Gambling Severity Index, short version (PGSI Mini), to investigate risk behaviour in problem gambling (Williams and Volberg, 2012)

Other key topics will include questions regarding the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on employment, finances, volunteering, charitable giving, lifestyle behaviours, accommodation and living arrangements, help-seeking behaviours, as well as any potential positive changes during this period

Statistical methods

Response rates will be calculated based on our administrative records from the previous KCMHR 2014–2016 survey on numbers of eligible participants. Information from the survey will be summarised with appropriate summary statistics (e.g. mean and SD for continuous measures; frequencies and proportions for categorical measures). All scales will be scored according to published instructions. Missing items on the GHQ, PCL-5 and AUDIT will be handled according to the protocol used in the previous KCMHR surveys, i.e. the lowest value is imputed if fewer than four items are missing on the measure. Differences in the composition of survey respondents will be compared to the overall eligible participant group and will be summarised. The assessment of the characterisation of survey respondents will draw on administrative records from the KCMHR survey 2014–2016 for ex-service personnel such as age, gender, rank and service branch.

The prevalence of probable mental disorders and wellbeing outcomes will be summarised using descriptive statistics. Associations between COVID-19 experiences and mental health will be tested using linear and logistic models as appropriate, with adjustments for measured confounders.

Data storage and security

Individuals who participate will be automatically assigned an ID number once their informed consent is obtained, allowing their online survey data to be held pseudonymously.

Online survey responses will be collected using REDCap survey software which will be hosted by King’s College London, on servers located in the UK. Data required for analysis will be downloaded in pseudonymous form and stored on KCL OneDrive. Any data held electronically will only be accessible by specified members of the research team who have been given authorisation to access the database. Access to the server is via assignment as an authorised user (a research team staff member who has a King’s ID number and a password which complies with the King’s password policy(i.e. containing a combination of numbers, letter and symbols). Authorised users are reviewed regularly and updated as needed (e.g. when a member of the research team leaves). Data will be stored separately from personal information. No identifying information will be presented in any reports or publications.

Data management and oversight

All research staff are provided with training regarding the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), KCL standards for handling data and Medical Research Council (MRC) data protection training.

Data required for analysis will be downloaded in pseudonymised form and stored on KCL OneDrive. Any interactions with REDCap will be logged and audited by a designated researcher. We will use a valid Data Protection and Security Toolkit from KCMHR at King’s College London and will follow this Toolkit during rollout. Data will be kept by KCMHR for twenty years as we may use the pseudonymous data in future research.

Ethical and safety considerations

Ethical approval has been gained from King’s College London Research Ethics Committee (Ref: HR-19/20–18626).

Confidentiality

To ensure participant confidentiality. Data will be stored separately from personal information (individuals who participate will be automatically assigned an ID number once their informed consent is obtained, allowing their online survey data to be held pseudonymously). No identifying information will be presented in any reports or publications. Aggregated data will be made available in reports for the OVA and future publications. Cells based on small numbers (i.e., n < 5) will be supressed. Pseudonymised datasets may be shared with other research institutions, but personal identifiable data will never be shared with other researchers outside of KCL.

Participant safety

To ensure participant safety when taking part in this study, the nature of the questionnaire is clearly explained on the PIS. The study webpage includes information about the study, the PIS, and resources signposting people to support services and helplines are available to revisit at any time. Participants are able to stop participating in the survey at any point and can skip questions (apart from the consent and eligibility questions at the beginning of the survey). Support information is made available during the survey for participants who recognise that they are feeling distressed (e.g., after the suicidal ideation/self-harm section). After participants have completed the survey, participants are offered a variety of resources signposting them to support services and helplines (including Armed Forces charities, NHS, charities or further guidance for urgent help for ex-serving personnel).

It is highlighted in the PIS that participants can contact the research team at a dedicated study email and mobile telephone number if they have any questions regarding the conduct of study (i.e., information that is covered in the Information Sheet). An automatic reply is set up, informing participants who email us that we will be able to respond to their emails within the next two working days, highlighting that the inbox will not be monitored outside regular office hours (i.e., 09:00 to 17:00, Monday to Friday). The automatic reply will include links to the study webpage and the PIS, which include information about the study and resources signposting participants to support services and helplines. In the unlikely event someone contacts us to ask for advice regarding their mental health, they will be directed to seek medical advice via their GP or in an emergency A&E.

Participant burden

The questionnaire has been designed to limit the burden of questions both in volume and experience negotiating the questionnaire. For example, the study has focused on measures that are essential or comparable to other COVID-19 studies to maximise comparability to other populations. The questionnaire survey was tested by the KCMHR research team and veterans to ensure efficient flow of questions and appropriate language. To reduce the participant burden, screening questions were applied were possible (e.g. AUDIT, PGSI). Only participants who respond positively to the screening question(s) are invited to complete the full measures.