Synergistic effects of natural products and commercial antibiotics—A mini–review 2010–2015

Lucía Nitsch-Velásquez
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.01.20186353

1 Abstract

Context The ‘antimicrobial resistant era’ requires advances in the approaches and technologies to find new treatments. The enhancement of the antimicrobial activity of commercially available drugs (CADs) by natural products (NPs) has successful mixtures (e.g., clavulanic acid and amoxicillin).

Objective To systematically review reports of synergistic effects of CADs and NPs against opportunistic microbial strains from 2010 to April 2016.

Methods The databases and search engines PubMed, Medline, Scifinder, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Scholar Google were systematically searched. Among the keywords utilized were: synergistic effects natural products and antibioitcs, botanicals and antibiotics bioassays, plant extracts interaction with antibioitics and antibiotic adjuvant bioassays. Only synergistic results were tabulated and analyzed according to CADs, NPs and strains.

Results A set of 76 studies that reported in vitro synergistic effects of CADs and NPs against gram–positive or gram–negative bacteria or fungi opportunistic strains was found. From the 60 reports on antibacterial adjuvants, the most frequent designs involved beta–lactamics or aminoglycosides against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The assayed NPs encompassed extracts or fractions from 22 different species distributed worldwide (45% extracted with non–polar solvents) and 33 purified compounds (flavonoids, other polyphenols and alkaloids).

Conclusions NPs as potential drug hits for antimicrobial adjuvants had been found and should continue in the drug discovery pipeline. The field certainly would benefit of advances in purification technologies, especially for polar extracts and bioassay platforms.

Introduction

The challenge of the antimicrobial resistant era: For almost half a century the treatment scenario had been straightforward for a particular set of infectious diseases in humans, animals, and plants1–3.

The evolutionary pressure that represented the systematic administration of antimicrobials— together with its involuntary mismanagement due to a variety of reasons— in concert with the evolution intrinsic to microbe’s life4 has been yielding resistant strains4,5: microbes evolved diversifying their ‘hunt’ strategies5 (see examples in Fig. 1 .a and b.). The consolidation of the antimicrobial resistance era (ARE)5–8 represents one step backwards regarding the previous victory over the infectious diseases; this leads to the risk of the infectious diseases recurrence as the first cause of death worldwide. Beyond that, the ARE effects extrapolate to immuno– compromised patients7,9, veterinary and plant management. To tackle the ARE, the WHO had stablished guidelines and priorities, including the development of new drugs and pesticides9. So, it can be said that the combat has begun; as it is going on is becoming evident that the challenge is larger than we thought at the beginning, and more bioinspiration is welcomed10. It is on creative scaffolds where Nature plays on our side, since natural products often defy a medicinal chemist’s imagination.

Figure 1:
Figure 1:

Depiction of examples of molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and antibiotic adjuvant interactions with natural products at a cellular level. a) Examples of molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, which are sites of potential interactions of phytochemicals with a generic resistant gram (-) bacteria50,54,59,64–67,69–78. . From extracellular space to inside: A = antibiotic, 1. extracellular space, 2. alginate, 3. outer cell membrane, 4. peri–plasmic space, 5. peptidoglycan wall, 6. inner cell membrane, 7. inner cellular space, 8. chromosomic and plasmid DNA. b) Examples of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms that can reduce the intrabacterial drug accumulation and adjuvant molecules with a generic gram–negative bacteria, such that facilitates the encounter of antibiotic with its target, which are sites of potential interactions with natural product compounds. In blue oval: A’ = a given antibiotic compound (no mutated target), In orange oval: Z = a given adjuvant agent(s), highlighted in red: the target of the antibiotics50,50,54,54,59,59,64,64,65,65,66,66,67,67,69,69,70,70,71,71,72,72,73,73,74,74,75,75,76,76,77,77,78. c) Potential interactions of NPs with subcellular components of a given Gram negative resistant bacteria50,54,59,64–67,69–77. d) Compilation of NPs and their proposed mechanism of action at subcellular level50,54,59,64–67,69–77.

The multi–targets therapies (MTT), as complex as they can be, are emerging as a viable option to be studied with rationale and random screenings (not necessarily with mechanisms of action based on one–drug–one–target or polypharmacology, e.g., ‘magic bullet drug’11). Combination therapy (CT), a type of MTT11,12 is one feasible option to combat the ARE (e.g., clavulanic acid–amoxicillin13 and treatments including immune system stimulaiton14. Phytopharmaceuticals A could be seen an MTT–CT option because a derivative from a given medicinal plant can contain a set of key components with a variety of targets, or one natural product can interact with several targets. But natural products as a CT option has a its own challenges to solve, e.g., expressly in quality control assurance, to innovate in the research pipelines and information organization to asure the achievement of drug candidates16,17.

A type of CT–research is the screening for natural products that can potentiate the antimicrobial activity of commercially available drugs (CADs), e.g., additive and synergistic effects. Natural products ranging from purified compounds to raw extracts, which can also have anti–inflammatory and immuno–stimulant activities. S cientific literature was reviewed to gain insight on the state of synergistic studies of NPs and commercially available drugs (CADs). Only reports that fell in the criteria below described were analyzed.

2.1 Literature Search Parameters

The literature search parameters were defined as following: i) Databases and search engines: National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) – Pubmed Central,18 Scifinder,19 Scopus,20 Sciencedirect.21 In the cases in which the search engine also yielded recommended articles related to the found article, follow up of such studies was performed. ii) Publication date: in the range from 2010 up to April 2016. iii) Targeted content: Antimicrobial activity evaluation of commercially available drugs together with natural extracts against opportunistic microbes (CAD and NE–OM), such that yielded synergistic effects results which data analysis included either FICI or a statistical comparison between control and test groups. Also, analog results from testing the main component(s) of any given natural extract were also included. iv) Keywords and phrases: The keywords applied to start the literature search in the different databases and search engines were: synergistic effects natural products and antibiotics, botanicals and antibiotics bioassays, plant extracts interaction with antibiotics, and antibiotic adjuvant bioassays. v) Exclusion criteria: results classified as either antagonist, additive, or non–interaction effects of CADs and NPs tests; results classified as either enhancement or modulating effects of CADs and NPs tests, such that were reported without statistical analysis, such that it was not possible to conclude if synergistic effects were observed; only the NPs (either as extract or purified components from it) were tested for antimicrobial activity; mixture of two or more NPs, even if those yielded antimicrobial synergistic effects; mixture of two or more CADs, even if those yielded antimicrobial synergistic effects. vi) Methodology: Results obtained by the microdilution method were included; the design could be either by Fractional Inhibitory Combination Index—FICI determination, or if the differences between control and mixture were established as statistically significant B.

2.1.1 Summary of the Literature Review Results

A total of 76 scientific reports of antimicrobial synergistic effects of NPs and CADs (NPs+CADs) were found, 89.5% are in PubMed database, being the years 2014 and 2015 with the highest publication frequency (see Fig. 2). Reports topics were distributed as follows: 60 related to antibacterials, four to antifungals and 12 to interaction mechanisms studies at cellular level. Studies were performed predominantly by interdepartmental collaborations distributed in four continents, only six reports involved international collaborations. The countries that mostly contributed were China, Korea and Brazil (range 10-15%). Asian countries were represented in about 56% of the articles. The articles were published in a variety of journals that belonged to different editorials.

Figure 2:
Figure 2:

Distribution of the 76 reviewed publications by time, locations and editorials. a) Publication frequency during 2010 to 2016 (April). b) Approximated continental publication contribution. c) Article distribution in editorials (usually one editorial hosted more than one journal).

The 60 scientific reports of antibacterial adjuvants, published in 2010 to April 2016 are summarized in 3 and A and are compiled in Tables 1 and 2); in which the convergence of traditional medicinal knowledge and ‘Westernized medicine’ can be observed. For instance the evaluation of Sami–Hyanglyun–Hwan Korean formulation and ciprofloxacine23, or the study of traditional medicinal plants from Cameroon24. They are proof that the mining natural products sensu lato (NPs) Ccan still yield useful drug additives to treat resistant nosocomial bacteria (see Figs. 3 and A). Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, a strain for which new antibiotics are urgently needed25, was the most common target. The antimicrobial interactions of NPs+CADs were determined by the microdilution method, usually by the checkerboard method, applying serial dilutions in the twofold factor mode. (see Fig. A). The set of CADs encompassed medications that are under control for the emergence resistant strains against those antibiotics26; it also included antibiotics that the WHO consider as essential drugs in any health care system27. The bioassays either tested raw extracts or purified natural products. Among the natural sources investigated were plants across the globe, from which specific plant organs were extracted, usually selected based on ethnobotanical knowledge (see Figs. 4 and Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1:

Summary of plants screened for antibiotic modulatory effects of commercially available drugs, that yielded synergistic effects. For more details see text.36,37

View this table:
Cont. Table 1:

Summary of plants screened for antibiotic modulatory effects of commercially available drugs against nosocomial bacteria, that yielded synergistic effects.24,38,79

View this table:
Cont. Table 1:

Summary of plants screened for antibiotic modulatory effects of commercially available drugs against nosocomial bacteria, that yielded synergistic effects32,45,80–85.

View this table:
Cont. Table 1:

Summary of plants screened for antibiotic modulatory effects of commercially available drugs against nosocomial bacteria, that yielded synergistic effects24,39,45,86–91.

View this table:
Cont. Table 1:

Summary of plants screened for antibiotic modulatory effects of commercially available drugs against nosocomial bacteria, that yielded synergistic effects23,24,40,62,67,92–96.

View this table:
Table 2:

Summary of purified natural products screened for antibiotic modulatory effects of commercially available drugs against nosocomial bacteria, that yielded synergistic effects. For more details see text32–34,46,47,51,70,71,97–101.

View this table:
Cont. Table 2:

Summary of purified natural products screened for antibiotic modulatory effects of commercially available drugs against nosocomial bacteria, that yielded synergistic effects38,47,48,60,64,76,80,99,101–103.

View this table:
Cont. Table 2:

Summary of purified natural products screened for antibiotic modulatory effects of commercially available drugs against nosocomial bacteria, that yielded synergistic effects35,55,63,69,75,80,104,104–110.

Figure 3:
Figure 3:

Summary of results of 64 studies of antibiotic synergistic assays of NPs and CADs a) Over all results were categorized by antibiotics, strains, and NPs. b) Distribution of bacterial strains that were susceptible to the mixture of NPs and CADs at a synergistic level. c) Distribution of antibiotics families that yielded synergistic effects with different NPs.

Tables 1 and 2 compile the organism’s family and scientific names, potential bioactive compound, organ extracted, polarity of the extracting solvent, the bacterial strains and antibiotics that yielded synergistic effects, comments, and the respective citation. General comments of three parameters are given below: commercially available drugs tested, bacterial strains assayed, and natural products tested. Commercially available drugs (CADs): from the 47 different drugs tested; 46 were antibiotics from different antibiotic families, and one drug was an antimicrobial with dual activity against bacteria and protozoa (see Fig. 3. In all the studies, the antimicrobial agents were purchased as at least 95% pure, and not as pharmaceutical formulation. The most frequently assayed antibiotics were (the antibiotic’s family is given in parenthesis): ampicillin (beta–lactams), ciprofloxacin (quinolones), and gentamicin (aminoglycosides). They are in the list for essential drugs in a health care system, recommended by the WHO and under the resistant surveillance projects by CDC and the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, BSAC as well.

The criteria for antibiotic selection varied from study to study, and often was not clearly stated In general, the most common motivations described in the articles’ introductions were: a) the antibiotics’ toxicity would be reduced by lowering effective concentration D, b) the economical burden associated to infectious diseases would be alleviated by shortening the dosages and hospitalization expenses, and c) the reverse the antibacterial resistance can potentially be achieved by exploring natural products bioactivity.

Bacterial strains usually were clinical isolates with a specific resistance (no full antibiogram reported). In the reviewed reports, the utilization of standard strains were the exception more than the rule (3% of the tested strains)32–40. In almost all the cases, resistant opportunistic bacteria were the target, the most frequently strain tested were clinical isolates of MRSA. MRSA is in the WHO list of High Priority Bacteria that requires research and development of new antibiotics25, and the CDC classifies MRSA as Serious Threat Level9. In 2014, MRSA was included among the US government National Targets for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria, aiming to reduce by half (to—at least—50%) the bloodstream infections caused by MRSA41. Shigella flexeneri, an intestinal pathogen, was the only pathogenic bacteria tested in the set of publications reviewed.

Several of the studied strains belong to the so–called ESKAPE pathogens species (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter)42. The ESKAPE strains are a set of antibiotic–resistant pathogenic bacteria that represents new paradigms regarding pathogenesis, transmission, and resistance42 Opportunistic bacteria not only represents a challenge in the ARE but can serve as model for other pathogenic strains that affect not only humans but animals and plants. Further tests of the extracts that yielded synergistic effects with CADs against ESKAPE pathogens would allow to asses their potential as drug candidates, as well as cytotoxicity assays. Gram–negative bacteria still represents a medicinal chemistry challenge. Even though gram–negative strains were included in the assays, synergistic effects were found mostly for gram–positive bacteria. The alkaloids lysergol and squalamina, flavonoids quercetin, luetolin, rhamnetin, and other polyphenols octyl gallate, benzylisothiocyanate, epigallo–catechin gallate, and the vitamin alpha–tocopherol yielded synergistic effects against gram–negative bacteria.

At the same time, the cases of selective synergistic and antagonistic effects36,37 can be of interest for biofermentation purposes. The characterization of the tested strains should be pursued to be as complete as possible. Most of the studies were exploratory and further microbiology tests could be performed in collaborations with international collaborations (for instance CO–ADD43 initiative could be an interesting option).

Natural products (NPs) were classified in two categories: raw extracts and main component of a given botanical extract. which were (see Fig. A): i) purified from the raw extract and whose molecular structure was elucidated, ii) prepared by total synthesis, or iii) commercially available NPs (see Table 2). NPs derived from other kingdoms were less frequently found, e.g., honey, algae, bacterial derived drug leads: platencimicyn and platencin.

Raw extracts: The compiled descriptors were: organism’s family and scientific names, organ extracted, and polarity of the extracting solvent (see Fig. 4). The plant organ most frequently analyzed were the stems, the aerial parts extracted summed up to 35% (see Fig. 4) Reports exploring flower extracts were not found; while the phenological state (e.g., seeding, flowering) or collection date were uncommonly reported.

Figure 4:
Figure 4:

a) Plant organs extracted. b) Distribution of purified natural products assayed in the set of reviewed scientific reports (that yielded synergistic effects with antibiotics). c) Extraction solvents, ordered according to their dielectric constant (ε).

The natural source and extract’s polarity were usually chosen based on references from traditional medicinal knowledge or ethnopharmacology. Other criteria were the follow up of a given specie, genera, or family; and one study aimed the exploration of side products from industrial processes of an essential oil producing plant24.

The extraction procedure was described in all the studies (maceration, infusion, reflux, or soxhlet methods). The majority of tested extracts were fractions (or subfractions) extracted with low–polarity solvents (see Fig. A.d). For instance, the alcoholic extracs were further fractionated, the non–polar subfraction was then bioassayed (e.g., ethyl acetate sub–fraction).E

Several techniques were utilized to analyze the extracts’ composition, e.g., a thin layer chromatography, high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. However, such analyses were not consistently included.

Polar extracts, the less utilized in the given reports set, can contain bioactive compounds that are already soluble24,36,37,45. However, the intricate nature, especially of aqueous extracts, has been limiting their exploitation. It is important to develop technologies that can allow for a more feasible purification process of polar extracts.

Chemical analysis and further bioactivity characterization should be pursued for the extracts in Tables ?? to 2. For example, the activity of Acacia mearnsii bark polar–extract had been explored against a variety of ESKAPE strains36,37, further characterization may lead to find drug hits and understanding of the antagonistic effects observed for some of the strains studied.

Main components of a given botanical extract or purified NPs whose molecular structure have been elucidated were described including i common chemical name, ii compound classification according to the secondary metabolites family, iii plant of origin, iv if the substance was purified from the raw extract, prepared, or commercially available (see Tables 1 and 2). The family most frequently tested were flavonoids (mostly chalcones and flavanones). To date some of them are included in dietary supplements that are not necessarily approved by the Food and Drug Administration, FDA. For instance, quercetin in vitamin C supplements that claim to boost the immune response14. Flavonoids show a variety of bioactivities —besides antibacterial— with a mid–intensity effect, i.e. anti–inflammatory and antiviral activities. Efforts toward understand their mechanism of action at a molecular level are ongoing12.

The adjuvant antimicrobial activity space for alkaloidal family was less explored. The 25% of the NPs families explored for that bioactivity (see Fig. A). Three alkaloids were clearly defined as druggable structures: berberine, platensymicin, platencin (see Tables 1 and 2) . These three alkaloids showed stronger adjuvant potency with a more specific effect than the set of flavonoids tested33,46–48, the latter two are being considered to be antibiotics per se and are under further development by Merck pharmaceuticals48 (see Table 2). The mechanism of action of these three compounds has been proposed to be orthogonal to those of the CADs. Further functionalization of their alkaloidal skeletons may allow improvement of their medicinal chemistry33,46–48.

The dominant supplier of natural products, by either natural extract purification or organic synthesis preparation, was Sigma–Aldrich company.

It is worth to mention that the aqueous extract obtained as a side product of the industrial essential oil extraction, the so–called the hydrolate, was tested24, which fits in the bioprospecting framework.

Successful examples of CADs+NPs, at in vitro level, hint that the enhancement of the antibacterial activity of CADs is a worthy approach to keep exploring and expanding. As it is further exploited, some challenges need to be addressed (or taken in account): a) A given extract can yield synergistic effects for some strains while antagonistic for other strains. b) The reproducibility is an issue related to the intrinsic complexity of natural extracts. c) The information included in the scientific reports can be more consistent across literature, e.g., extract’s composition, control experiments, strain profile. d) The need of widespread a high throughput analysis platform to speed up the analysis in each stage of the NPDD. e) Funding related to bioprospecting studies, as well as human resources, are required. f) Innovative approaches, aiming to increase the success rate of plausible medications derived from NPs and CADs mixtures need to keep developing.

2.1.2 Examples of NPs Mechanisms of Action That are Orthogonal to the Antibiotics’ Mechanism of Action

Proposed interactions of NPs with bacterial components are depicted in Figs. 1 and 1. Curcumin, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg) and berberine are examples of natural products whose mechanism of action have been frequently studied at sub–cellular level. The main component in the curcuma spice, curcumin, disrupted the bacterial cell membrane, probably by intercalating in the lipid bilayer49–51. The main antioxidant component in green tea, EGCg, inhibited beta–lactamase (an antibiotic degrading enzyme); EGCg interacts with cell membrane components, disrupting the cell membrane integrity50,52–60. The alkaloid berberin inhibited the efflux pumps with medium specificity—a resistance mechanism— enabling the antibiotics to remain longer periods inside the bacteria to interact with the desired target46,56,61–63. Bacterial cell membrane disruption is a non–specific interaction, saponins, other polyphenols and flavonoids64, and essential oils can exert this effect as well36,65.

Bacteriostatic effects of polyphenolic compounds such as coumarins, gallic acid, and flavonoids are attributed to: i to precipitate proteins, a non specific interaction that reduces the bacterial metabolism65,66; ii to act as enzymatic reversible inhibitors65,66, reducing the bacterial metabolism, especially if the targets are housekeeping processes; or iii to deplete the bacterial proton motive force and electron flow, thus reducing the amount of the biochemical energy available, which can induce a non–reproductive state in the bacterial metabolism67. As more information on these mechanisms of actions is gathered, the medicinal chemistry of NPs as drug candidates can be improved. Assays aiming a high throughput approach for the exploration of NPs mechanisms of action against bacteria have been developed, for instance the NPs interactions with peptidoglycan, ATPases inhibitors, efflux pump inhibitors, membrane disruption50,54. Studies on inhibitors of bacterial biofilm formation68 requires more attention—from the NPs perspective.

Antifungal synergistic effects: four reports were found testing a total of 12 opportunistic strains including filamentous fungi (see Table 3). Three extracts and two purified natural products yielded synergistic effects with azole type antifungals.

View this table:
Table 3:

Summary of plants screened for antimicrobial modulatory effects of commercially available drugs, that yielded synergistic effects against fungi111–114. Strains: AFl=Aspergillus flavus, AFm=Aspergillus fumigatus, AN=Aspergillus niger CA=Candida albicans, CG=Candida glabrata, CKr=Candida krusei, CKf=Candida kefyr, CP=Candida parapsilosis, CT=Candida t, MC=Microsporus canis, PN=Penicillum funiculosum, PO=Penicillium ochrochloron Antimicrobials: BIF=bifonazole, FLU=fluconazole, KET=ketoconazole, MIC=miconazole.

3 Final remarks and comments

The field of antimicrobial synergistic effects is active and yielding drug hits and extracts with promising bioactivities and mechanisms of action. In order to advance in the drug discovery research pipeline is important to pursue the full characterization of the natural products and strains tested; for which inter– and multi–disciplinary collaborations at local and international level are needed and funding agencies institutions should enhance support, not only by the grants per se but by facilitating the interactions of scientist from different areas such that more collaborations can emerge. Interactions of this scientific community with industries that utilize plants as raw materials can help to identify potential niches for further plant waste exploitation, contributing to form circular economies in the agroindustry.

Data Availability

Compiled information from studies is included in tables.

A Compilation of the Reports of Synergistic Effects of NPs and CADs

The compiled reports of binary mixtures of natural products and commercially available drugs, NPs+CADs, that yielded synergistic effects against opportunistic bacteria were divided in two types of natural products, plant extracts (Table 1) and purified natural products (Table 2). A section of fungicide activity is in Table 3.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Dr. Troy Wood, Dr. Anthony Campagnari and Dr. Nicole Luke (UB), Dr. Brooke (UVG) for sharing their expertise.

Footnotes

  • ↵A The Indian governmental drug regulation agency defines phytopharmaceuticals as a fraction of an extract from a given medicinal plant or its parts. Such that the fraction has been purified and standardized in its composition of at least four compounds, which have been detected and quantified. It encompasses the preparation administration for internal or external use in humans or animals, with purpose of diagnosis, treatment, mitigation, or prevention of any disease or disorder. Parenteral administration is excluded15.

  • ↵B Another commonly utilized assay is the bioactive compound(s) disk diffusion assay, which is a useful screening tool, but has the drawback of the unknown diffusion factor for NPs, which can become a limiting factor when searching for synergistic effects, e.g., yielding false negative results. In some cases, a pre-screening panel was performed applying the agar diffusion test. It should be noted that deviations or disagreement between the results of those two methods can be observed, in some cases due to the low solubility or low diffusion of the analyte22.

  • ↵C The term natural products sensu lato, as applied in here, includes extracts derived from living organisms as well as purified compounds from such an extracts. These compounds could be obtained from either the direct original source, as biotechnological products, or from organic synthesis, being commercially available, or isolated at laboratory scale.

  • ↵D For instance, the associated toxicities to the most frequently studied antibiotics are: i) ampicillin can induce the development of asthma28,29; ii) ciprofloxacin can affect the circulatory system in 1% of the cases, and tendinitis29. Also, occasional anaphylactic reactions due to beta–lactamics administration have been reported28,30. iii) aminoglycosides (e.g., gentamicin) can cause ototoxicity [5% –10%], which can affect, adults, children and fetus; they can interact with other medications enhancing the toxicity effects28,31.

  • ↵E Non–polar extracts were usually redissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), and then tested for their bioactivity. DMSO is not present in the final drug formulations, but it is commonly utilized to dissolve low polarity compounds in aqueous systems, instead of non-polar solvents such as hexane. DMSO by itself has a metabolic effect in cells that can affect the outcome bioactivity results44. Control experiments quantifying solvents effects were not generally clearly stated in the studies summarized in Tables 1 and 2. This type of experiments could even be considered as a ternary mixture: NPs, CAA, and the solvent. Other approaches for suspension or dissolution of NPs are needed in order to reduce false positives or potency overestimation of a given NPs.

References

  1. [1].↵
    Martins da Costa, P.; Loureiro, L.; Matos, A. Transfer of multidrug-resistant bacteria between intermingled ecological niches: the interface between humans, animals and the environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013, 10, 278–294, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3564142/.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. [2].
    Holmes, A.; Moore, L.; Sundsfjor, A.; Steinbakk, M.; Regmi, S.; Karkey, A.; Guerin, P.; Piddock, L. Antimicrobials: access and sustainable effectiveness II: Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 2016, 387, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26603922.
  3. [3].↵
    Chanda, S.; Rakholiya, K. In Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances; Mendez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Micobiology book series; Formatex Research Center, 2011; Chapter Combination therapy: synergism between natural plant extracts and antibiotics against infectious diseases, pp 520–529 p, 656, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kalpna_Rakholiya3/publication/268064090_Combination_therapy_Synergism_between_natural_plant_extracts_and_antibiotics_links/54e5ae380cf22703d5c19ac9.pdf.
  4. [4].↵
    Kn oppel, A.; N asvall, J.; Andersson, D. I. Evolution of antibiotic resistance without antibiotic exposure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017, 61, pii: e01495–17, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893783.
    OpenUrl
  5. [5].↵
    Brown, E. D.; Wright, G. D. Antibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era. Nature 2016, 529, 336–43, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26791724.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. [6].
    Alanis, A. J. Resistance to antibiotics: are we in the pos-antibiotic era? Arch Med Res 2005, 36, 697–705, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16216651.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. [7].↵
    Hughes, D. Selection and evolution of resistance to antimicrobial drugs. IUBMB Life 2014, 66, 521–9, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24933583.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. [8].↵
    Jensen, R. H. Resistance in human pathogenic yeasts and filamentous fungi: prevalence, underlying molecular mechanisms and link to the use of antifungals in humans and the environment. Dan Med J 2016, 63, pii: B5288, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27697142.
    OpenUrl
  9. [9].↵
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention CDC, Antibiotic resistance solutions initiative. Feb 28th, 2016. Accessed: Jul 25th, 2017; https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/solutions-initiative/index.html.
  10. [10].↵
    Beghyn, T.; Deprez-Poulain, R.; Willand, N.; Folleas, B.; Deprez, B. Natural compounds: leads or ideas? Bioinspired molecules for drug discovery. Chem Biol Drug Des 2008, 72, 3–15, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18554253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. [11].↵
    Anighoro, A.; Bajorath, J.; Rastelli, G. Polypharmacology: challenges and opportunities in drug discovery. J Med Chem 2014, 57, 7874–87, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24946140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. [12].↵
    Xie, L.; Bourne, P. E. Developing multi-target therapeutics to fine-tune the evolutionary dynamics of the cancer ecosystem. Front Pharmacol 2015, 6, 209, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441664.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. [13].↵
    Paradkar, A. Clavulanic acid production by Streptomyces clavuligerus: biogenesis, regulation and strain improvement. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2013, 66, 411–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. [14].↵
    CVS pharmacy, CVS Health Immune Support Vitamin C Orange-Flavored Fizzy Drink. 2017. Accessed: Nov 6, 2017; https://www.cvs.com/shop/cvs-health-immune-support-vitamin-c-orange-flavored-fizzy-drink-prodid-944180?skuId=944180.
  15. [15].↵
    Bhatt, A. Phytopharmaceuticals: a new drug class regulated in India. Persp Clin Res 2016, 7, 59–61, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4840792/.
    OpenUrl
  16. [16].↵
    Wagner, H.; Ulrich-Merzenich, G. Synergy research: Approaching a new generation of phytopharmaceuticals. Phytomedicine 2009, 16, 97–110, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19211237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. [17].↵
    Peters, J. U. Polypharmacology - foe or friend? J Med Chem 2013, 56, 8955–71, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23919353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. [18].↵
    U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information. 2018. Accessed: Jul 13th, 2018; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
  19. [19].↵
    American Chemical Society, Scifinder, a CAS solution. 2018; https://scifinder.cas.org/.
  20. [20].↵
    Elsevier B. V., Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/home.uri.
  21. [21].↵
    Elsevier B. V., ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/.
  22. [22].↵
    Cos, P.; Vlietinck, A. J.; Berghe, D. V.; Maes, L. Anti-infective potential of natural products: how to develop a stronger in vitro ‘proof-of-concept’. J Ethnopharmacol 2006, 106, 290–302, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16698208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. [23].↵
    Choi, J. G.; Choi, J. Y.; Mun, S. H.; Kang, O. H.; Bharaj, P.; Shin, D. W.; Chong, M. S.; Kwon, D. Y. Antimicrobial activity and synergism of Sami-Hyanglyun-Hwan with ciprofloxacin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2015, 8, 538–42, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26276284.
    OpenUrl
  24. [24].↵
    Njimoh, D. L.; Assob, J. C.; Mokake, S. E.; Nyhalah, D. J.; Yinda, C. K.; Sandjon, B. Antimicrobial activities of a plethora of medicinal plant extracts and hydrolates against human pathogens and their potential to reverse antibiotic resistance. Int J Microbiol 2015, 2015, 547156, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180528.
    OpenUrl
  25. [25].↵
    World Health Organization (WHO), WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. Posted in website Feb 27, 2017. 2017; http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/bacteria-antibiotics-needed/en/.
  26. [26].↵
    The British Society for Antimicrobial Therapy (BSAT), Resistance surveillance project: antimicrobial abbreviations. 2017; http://www.bsacsurv.org/science/antimicrobials/.
  27. [27].↵
    World Health Organization, WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. 2017. Accessed March 24th, 2018; http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/20thEML2017.pdf?ua=1.
  28. [28].↵
    Toxicology and Environmental Health Information Program, US National Library of Medicine, TOXNET (on line database). 2017; https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/.
  29. [29].↵
    American Society of Health–System Pharmacists (ASHSP), Drug Information 2011; ASHSP: Bethesda, MD, 2011; p 375.
  30. [30].↵
    US National Institute of Health, Current Medication Information for CIPRO (ciprofloxacin hydrochloride) tablet, film coated CIPOR (ciprofloxacin) kit. 2011.
  31. [31].↵
    Touma, B. J. Gentamicin Toxicity. American Hearing Research Foundation 2012, http://american-hearing.org/disorders/gentamicin-toxicity/.
  32. [32].↵
    Al-Ani, I.; Zimmermann, S.; Reichling, J.; Wink, M. Pharmacological synergism of bee venom and melittin with antibiotics and plant secondary metabolites against multi-drug resistant microbial pathogens. Phytomed 2015, 22, 245–55, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25765829.
    OpenUrl
  33. [33].↵
    Wojtyczka, R. D.; Dziedzic, A.; Kepa, M.; Kubina, R.; Kabala-Dzik, A.; Mularz, T.; Idzik, D. Berberine enhances the antibacterial activity of selected antibiotics against coagulase-negative Staphylococcus strains in vitro. Molecules 2014, 19, 6583–96, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24858093.
    OpenUrl
  34. [34].↵
    Dey, D.; Ghosh, S.; Ray, R.; Hazra, B. Polyphenolic secondary metabolites synergize the activity of commercial antibiotics against clinical isolates of beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Phytother Res 2016, 30, 272–82, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26668123.
    OpenUrl
  35. [35].↵
    Amin, M. U.; Khurram, M.; Khattak, B.; Khan, J. Antibiotic additive and synergistic action of rutin, morin and quercetin against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Complement Altern Med 2015, 15, 59, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879586.
    OpenUrl
  36. [36].↵
    Olajuyigbe, O. O.; Afolayan, A. J. Synergistic interactions of methanolic extract of Acacia mearnsii De Wild. with antibiotics against bacteria of clinical relevance. Int J Mol Sci 2012, 13, 8915–32, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22942742.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. [37].↵
    Olajuyigbe, O. O.; Coopoosamy, R. M. Influence of first-line antibiotics on the antibacterial activities of acetone stem bark extract of Acacia mearnsii De Wild. against Drug-Resistant Bacterial Isolates. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014, 423751, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25101132.
  38. [38].↵
    Eumkeb, G.; Sakdarat, S.; Siriwog, S. Reversing beta–lactam antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus with galangin from Alpinia officinarum Hance and synergism with ceftazidime. Phytomed 2010, 18, 40–45, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21036573.
    OpenUrl
  39. [39].↵
    Figueredo, F.; Lucena, B.; Tintino, S.; Matias, E.; Leite, N.; Andrade, J.; Nogueira, L.; Morais, E.; Jgm, C.; Coutinho, H.; Rodrigues, F. Chemical composition and evaluation of modulatory of the antibiotic activity from extract and essential oil of Myracrodruon urundeuva. Pharm Biol 2014, 52, 560–65, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24251788.
    OpenUrl
  40. [40].↵
    Tintino, S. R.; Souza, C. E. S.; Guedes, G. M. M.; Costa, J. I. V.; Duarte, F. M.; Chaves, M. C. O.; Silva, V. A.; Pessôa, H. L. F.; Lima, M. A.; Garcia, C. A.; Coutinho, H. D. M. Modulatory antimicrobial activity of Piper arboreum extracts. Acta Botanica Croatica 2014, 73, https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/botcro/73/1/article-p303.xml?lang=en.
  41. [41].↵
    The White House, National action plan for combating antibiotic–resistant bacteria; Addressing policy recommendations of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology; 2015; p 63.
  42. [42].↵
    Pendleton, J. N.; Gorman, S. P.; Gilmore, B. F. Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens. Expert Rev Anti–Infective Ther 2013, 11, 297–308, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23458769.
    OpenUrl
  43. [43].↵
    University of Queensland, Community for Open Antimicrobial Drug Discovery CO– ADD. 2016. Accessed March 27th, 2016; http://www.co-add.org/content/free-screening.
  44. [44].↵
    Busby , Jr., W. F.; Ackermann, J. M.; Crespi, C. L. Effect of methanol, ethanol, dimethylsulfoxide, and acetonitrile on in vitro activies of cDNA–expressed human cytochromes P–450. Drug Metabolism Disposition 1999, 27, 246–249, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9929510.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. [45].↵
    Fankam, A. G.; Kuete, V.; Voukeng, I. K.; Kuiate, J. R.; Pages, J. M. Antibacterial activities of selected Cameroonian spices and their synergistic effects with antibiotics against multidrug-resistant phenotypes. BMC Complement Altern Med 2011, 11, 104, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22044718.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. [46].↵
    Zhou, X.; Yang, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y. Potential of berberine to enhance antimicrobial activity of commonly used antibiotics for dairy cow mastitis caused by multiple drug-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis infection. Genet Mol Res 2015, 14, 9683–92, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26345901.
    OpenUrl
  47. [47].↵
    Zuo, G. Y.; Li, Y.; Han, J.; Wang, G. C.; Zhang, Y. L.; Bian, Z. Q. Antibacterial and synergy of berberines with antibacterial agents against clinical multi-drug resistant isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Molecules 2012, 17, 10322–30, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22932213.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. [48].↵
    Allahverdiyey, A.; Bagirova, M.; Abamor, E.; Ates, S.; Koc, R.; Miraloglu, M.; Elicek, S.; Yaman, S.; Unal, G. The use of platensimycin and platencin to fight antibiotic resistance. Infect Drug Resist 2013, 6, 99–114, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082790.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. [49].↵
    Tyagi, P.; Singh, M.; Kumari, H.; Kumari, A.; Mukhopadhyay, K. Bactericidal activity of curcumin I is associated with damaging of bacterial membrane. PLoS One 2015, 10, e0121313, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25811596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. [50].↵
    Mun, S. H.; Kim, S. B.; Kong, R.; Choi, J. G.; Kim, Y. C.; Shin, D. W.; Kang, O. H.; Kwon, D. Y. Curcumin reverse methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules 2014, 19, 18283–95, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. [51].↵
    Mun, S. H.; Joung, D. K.; Kim, Y. S.; Kang, O. H.; Kim, S. B.; Seo, Y. S.; Kim, Y. C.; Lee, D. S.; Shin, D. W.; Kweon, K. T.; Kwon, D. Y. Synergistic antibacterial effect of curcumin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Phytomed 2013, 20, 714– 8, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23537748.
    OpenUrl
  52. [52].↵
    Al-Daihan, S.; Al-Faham, M.; Al-shawi, N.; Almayman, R.; Brnawi, A.; zargar, S.; Bhat, R. s. Antibacterial activity and phytochemical screening of some medicinal plants commonly used in Saudi Arabia against selected pathogenic microorganisms. J King Saud Univ Sci 2013, 25, 115–120, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101836471200050X.
    OpenUrl
  53. [53].
    Gyawali, R.; Ibrahim, S. A. Natural products as antimicrobial agents. Food Control 2014, 46, 412–429, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S095671351400320X.
    OpenUrl
  54. [54].↵
    Lee, Y. S.; Lee, D. Y.; Kim, Y. B.; Lee, S. W.; Cha, S. W.; Park, H. W.; Kim, G. S.; Kwon, D. Y.; Lee, M. H.; Han, S. H. The mechanism underlying the antibacterial activity of shikonin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015, 2015, 520578, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26265924.
    OpenUrl
  55. [55].↵
    Mun, S. H.; Kang, O. H.; Joung, D. K.; Kim, S. B.; Seo, Y. S.; Choi, J. G.; Lee, Y. S.; Cha, S. W.; Ahn, Y. S.; Han, S. H.; Kwon, D. Y. Combination therapy of sophoraflavanone B against MRSA: in vitro synergy testing. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013, 2013, 823794, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24319486.
    OpenUrl
  56. [56].↵
    Qiu, S.; Sun, H.; Zhang, A.-H.; Xu, H.-Y.; Yan, G.-L.; Han, Y.; Wang, X.-J. Natural alkaloids: basic aspects, biological roles, and future perspectives. Chinese J Nat Med 2014, 12, 401–406, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24969519.
    OpenUrl
  57. [57].
    Teethaisong, Y.; Autarkool, N.; Sirichaiwtchakoon, K.; Drubphachaya, P.; Kuptitayanant, S.; Eumkeb, G. Synergistic activity and mechanism of action of Stephania suberosa Forman extract and ampicillin combination agains ampicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Biome Sci 2014, 21, 90, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25208614.
    OpenUrl
  58. [58].
    Ulrich-Merzenich, G. S. Combination screening of synthetic drugs and plant derived natural products —Potential and challenges for drug development. Synergy 2014, 1, 59– 69, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213713014000121.
    OpenUrl
  59. [59].↵
    Steinmann, J.; Buer, J.; Pietschmann, T.; Steinmann, E. Anti-infective properties of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a component of green tea. Br J Pharmacol 2013, 168, 1059–73, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23072320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. [60].↵
    Zuo, G. Y.; Han, Z. Q.; Han, J.; Hao, X. Y.; Tang, H. S.; Wang, G. C. Antimicrobial activity and synergy of antibiotics with two biphenyl compounds, protosappanins A and B from Sappan Lignum against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Pharm Pharmacol 2015, 67, 1439–47, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25920539.
    OpenUrl
  61. [61].↵
    Cushnie, T. P.; Cushnie, B.; Lamb, A. J. Alkaloids: an overview of their antibacterial, antibiotic-enhancing and antivirulence activities. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2014, 44, 377–86, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25130096.
    OpenUrl
  62. [62].↵
    Teethaisong, Y.; Autarkool, N.; Sirichaiwetchakoon, K.; Krubphachaya, P.; Kupittayanant, S.; Eumkeb, G. Synergistic activity and mechanism of action of Stephania suberosa Forman extract and ampicillin combination against ampicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Biomed Sci 2014, 21, 90, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25208614.
    OpenUrl
  63. [63].↵
    Zuo, G. Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Han, J.; Wang, G. C.; Zhang, Y. L.; Pan, W. D. Synergistic antibacterial and antibiotic effects of bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloids on clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Molecules 2011, 16, 9819–26, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22117171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. [64].↵
    Joung, D. K.; Lee, Y. S.; Han, S. H.; Lee, S. W.; Cha, S. W.; Mun, S. H.; Kong, R.; Kang, O. H.; Song, H. J.; Shin, D. W.; Kwon, D. Y. Potentiating activity of luteolin on membrane permeabilizing agent and ATPase inhibitor against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2016, 9, 19–22, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26851780.
    OpenUrl
  65. [65].↵
    Cowan, M. M. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999, 12, 564–82, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10515903.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. [66].↵
    Trenin, A. S. Microbial metabolites inhibiting sterol biosynthesis: Their chemical diversity and characteristics of the mechanism of action. Russ J Bioorg Chem 2013, 39, 565–587, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25696927.
    OpenUrl
  67. [67].↵
    Valcourt, C.; Saulnier, P.; Umerska, A.; Zanelli, M. P.; Montagu, A.; Rossines, E.; Joly-Guillou, M. L. Synergistic interactions between doxycycline and terpenic components of essential oils encapsulated within lipid nanocapsules against gram negative bacteria. Int J Pharm 2016, 498, 23–31, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631640.
    OpenUrl
  68. [68].↵
    Santajit, S.; Indrawattana, N. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. Biomed Res Int 2016, 2016, Article ID: 2475067, 1–8, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274985.
  69. [69].↵
    Andrade, J. C.; Morais-Braga, M. F.; Guedes, G. M.; Tintino, S. R.; Freitas, M. A.; Menezes, I. R.; Coutinho, H. D. Enhancement of the antibiotic activity of aminoglycosides by alpha-tocopherol and other cholesterol derivates. Biomed Pharmacother 2014, 68, 1065–9, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25458794.
    OpenUrl
  70. [70].↵
    Chan, B. C.; Ip, M.; Lau, C. B.; Lui, S. L.; Jolivalt, C.; Ganem-Elbaz, C.; Litaudon, M.; Reiner, N. E.; Gong, H.; See, R. H.; Fung, K. P.; Leung, P. C. Synergistic effects of baicalein with ciprofloxacin against NorA over-expressed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and inhibition of MRSA pyruvate kinase. J Ethnopharmacol 2011, 137, 767–73, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21782012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. [71].↵
    Chan, B. C.; Ip, M.; Gong, H.; Lui, S. L.; See, R. H.; Jolivalt, C.; Fung, K. P.; Leung, P. C.; Reiner, N. E.; Lau, C. B. Synergistic effects of diosmetin with erythromycin against ABC transporter over-expressed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) RN4220/pUL5054 and inhibition of MRSA pyruvate kinase. Phytomed 2013, 20, 611–4, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23541215.
    OpenUrl
  72. [72].↵
    Fluit, A. C.; Visser, M. R.; Schmitz, F. J. Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001, 14, 836–71, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11585788.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. [73].↵
    Friedman, M. Chemistry and multibeneficial bioactivities of carvacrol (4–isopropyl–2– methylphenol), a component of essential oils produced by aromatic plants and spices. J Agric Food Chem 2014, 62, 7652–70, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25058878.
    OpenUrl
  74. [74].↵
    Hemaiswarya, S.; Kruthiventi, A. K.; Doble, M. Synergism between natural products and antibiotics against infectious diseases. Phytomed 2008, 15, 639–52, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18599280.
    OpenUrl
  75. [75].↵
    Lavignet, J.; Brunel, J.; Chevalier, J.; Pages, J. Squalamine, an original chemosensitizer to combat antibiotic–resistant Gram–negative bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010, 65, 799–801, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20147322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. [76].↵
    Maurya, A.; Dwivedi, G. R.; Darokar, M. P.; Srivastava, S. K. Antibacterial and synergy of clavine alkaloid lysergol and its derivatives against nalidixic acid-resistant Escherichia coli. Chem Biol Drug Des 2013, 81, 484–90, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23290001.
    OpenUrl
  77. [77].↵
    Zhao, W. H.; Hu, Z. Q.; Okubo, S.; Hara, Y.; Shimamura, T. Mechanism of synergy between epigallocatechin gallate and beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001, 45, 1737–42, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11353619.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. [78].↵
    Depardieu, F.; Podglajen, I.; Leclercq, R.; Collatz, E.; Courvalin, P. Modes and modulations of antibiotic resistance gene expression. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007, 20, 79–114, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17223624.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. [79].↵
    Joray, M. B.; Gonzalez, M. L.; Palacios, S. M.; Carpinella, M. C. Antibacterial activity of the plant-derived compounds 23-methyl-6-O-desmethylauricepyrone and (Z,Z)-5-(trideca-4,7-dienyl)resorcinol and their synergy with antibiotics against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Agric Food Chem 2011, 59, 11534–42, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21958238.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. [80].↵
    Zuo, G. Y.; Zhang, X. J.; Han, J.; Li, Y. Q.; Wang, G. C. In vitro synergism of magnolol and honokiol in combination with antibacterial agents against clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). BMC Complement Altern Med 2015, 15, 425, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26627468.
    OpenUrl
  81. [81].
    Konate, K.; Mavoungou, J. F.; Lepengue, A. N.; Aworet-Samseny, R. R.; Hilou, A.; Souza, A.; Dicko, M. H.; M’Batchi, B. Antibacterial activity against beta-lactamase producing Methicillin and Ampicillin-resistants Staphylococcus aureus: Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI) determination. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2012, 11, 18, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22716026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. [82].
    Wongsariya, K.; Phanthong, P.; Bunyapraphatsara, N.; Srisukh, V.; Chomnawang, M. T. Synergistic interaction and mode of action of Citrus hystrix essential oil against bacteria causing periodontal diseases. Pharm Biol 2014, 52, 273–80, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24102651.
    OpenUrl
  83. [83].
    Fankam, A. G.; Kuiate, J. R.; Kuete, V. Antibacterial and antibiotic resistance modifying activity of the extracts from Allanblackia gabonensis, Combretum molle and Gladiolus quartinianus against Gram-negative bacteria including multi-drug resistant phenotypes. BMC Complement Altern Med 2015, 15, 206, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26122102.
    OpenUrl
  84. [84].
    Ferreira Matias, E. F.; Ferreira Alves, E.; Nascimento Silva, M. K. d.; Alencar Carvalho, V. R. d.; Rocha Medeiros, C.; dos Santos, F. A. V.; Nilo Bitu, V. d. C.; de Souza, C. E. S.; Gomes Figueredo, F.; Alencar Menezes, I. R.; Coutinho, H. D. M.; Alencar Ferreira, J. V. d.; de Lima, L. F.; da Costa, J. M. Phytochemical characterization by HPLC and evaluation of antibacterial and aminoglycoside resistance-modifying activity of chloroform fractions of Cordia verbenacea DC leaf extracts. Eur J Integrative Med 2015, 7, 251–257, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Phytochemical-characterization-by-HPLC-and-of-and-Matias-Alves/1b286aa15ed07f51aa991a9e5c86c163ed816bf6.
    OpenUrl
  85. [85].↵
    Lavor, A. K. L. S.; Matias, E. F. F.; Alves, E. F.; Santos, B. S.; Figueredo, F. G.; Lima, L. F.; Leite, N. F.; Sobral-Souza, C. E.; Andrade, J. C.; Alencar, L. B. B.; Brito, D. I. V.; Albuquerque, R. S.; Coutinho, H. D. M. Association between drugs and herbal products: In vitro enhancement of the antibiotic activity by fractions from leaves of Croton campestris A. (Euphorbiaceae). Eur J Integrative Med 2014, 6, 301–306, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1876382014000341.
    OpenUrl
  86. [86].↵
    Choi, J.; Kang, O.; Brice, O.; Lee, Y.; Chae, H.; Oh, Y.; Sohn, D.; Park, H.; Coi, H.; Kim, S.; Shin, D.; Kwon, D. Antibacterial activity of Ecklonia cava against methicillin– resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella spp. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2010, 7, 435–41, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20001325.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  87. [87].
    Hassan, S. T.; Berchova, K.; Majerova, M.; Pokorna, M.; Svajdienka, E. In vitro synergistic effect of Hibiscus sabdariffa aqueous extract in combination with standard antibiotics agains Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates. Pharm Biol 2016, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26731378.
  88. [88].
    An, J.; Zuo, G. Y.; Hao, X. Y.; Wang, G. C.; Li, Z. S. Antibacterial and synergy of a flavanonol rhamnoside with antibiotics against clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Phytomed 2011, 18, 990–3, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21466953.
    OpenUrl
  89. [89].
    Coutinho, H. D.; Costa, J. G.; Falcao-Silva, V. S.; Siqueira-Junior, J. P.; Lima, E. O. In vitro additive effect of Hyptis martiusii in the resistance to aminoglycosides of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pharm Biol 2010, 48, 1002–6, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20731551.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  90. [90].
    Jenkins, R.; Cooper, R. Improving antibiotic activity against wound pathogens with Manuka honey in vitro. PLOS ONE 2012, 7, e45600, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458911/.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. [91].↵
    Braz-Jandu, J. J.; Nascimento da Silva, L.; da Silva, M.; dos Santos–Coreia, M. Antimicrobial activity and synergistic effects of an ethyl acetate fraction from methanol extract of Myracrodruon urundeuva bark. J Med Plant Res 2015, 9, 641–46, https://academicjournals.org/journal/JMPR/article-stat/C16446553723.
    OpenUrl
  92. [92].↵
    Silva, N. C. C.; Fernandes–Junior, A. Biological properties of medicinal plants: a review of their antimicrobial activity. J Venom Anim Toxins Including Trop Dis 2010, 16, 402–13, http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1678-91992010000300006&script=sciarttext.
    OpenUrl
  93. [93].
    Chan, B. C.; Han, X. Q.; Lui, S. L.; Wong, C. W.; Wang, T. B.; Cheung, D. W.; Cheng, S. W.; Ip, M.; Han, S. Q.; Yang, X. S.; Jolivalt, C.; Lau, C. B.; Leung, P. C.; Fung, K. P. Combating against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—two fatty acids from Purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) exhibit synergistic effects with erythromycin. J Pharm Pharmacol 2015, 67, 107–16, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25212982.
    OpenUrl
  94. [94].
    Gomez, T.; Carneiro, A.; Perrelli, K.; Alves, A.; Azevedo, E. In vitro synergistic effect of Psidium guineense (Swartz) in combination with antimicrobial agents against methicillin–resistant Stabphylococcus aureus strains. Sci World J 2012, 2012, article ID 158237, 7 pp, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349319/.
  95. [95].
    Lee, D. S.; Kim, Y. M.; Lee, M. S.; Ahn, C. B.; Jung, W. K.; Je, J. Y. Synergistic effects between aminoethyl-chitosans and beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2010, 20, 975–8, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20036533.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  96. [96].↵
    Wang, S. Y.; Sun, Z. L.; Liu, T.; Gibbons, S.; Zhang, W. J.; Qing, M. Flavonoids from Sophora moorcroftiana and their synergistic antibacterial effects on MRSA. Phytother Res 2014, 28, 1071–6, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24338874.
    OpenUrl
  97. [97].↵
    Liu, G.; Liang, J. C.; Wang, X. L.; Li, Z. H.; Wang, W.; Guo, N.; Wu, X. P.; Shen, F. G.; Xing, M. X.; Liu, L. H.; Li, L.; Liu, M. Y.; Yu, L. In vitro synergy of biochanin A and ciprofloxacin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules 2011, 16, 6656–66, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25134769.
    OpenUrl
  98. [98].
    Holler, J. G.; Slotved, H. C.; Molgaard, P.; Olsen, C. E.; Christensen, S. B. Chalcone inhibitors of the NorA efflux pump in Staphylococcus aureus whole cells and enriched everted membrane vesicles. Bioorg Med Chem 2012, 20, 4514–21, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22682300.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  99. [99].↵
    Rondevaldova, J.; Leuner, O.; Teka, A.; Lulekal, E.; Havlik, J.; Van Damme, P.; Kokoska, L. In vitro antistaphylococcal effects of Embelia schimperi extracts and their component embelin with oxacillin and tetracycline. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015, 2015, 175983, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802535.
    OpenUrl
  100. [100].
    Novy, P.; Rondevaldova, J.; Kourimska, L.; Kokoska, L. Synergistic interactions of epigallocatechin gallate and oxytetracycline against various drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in vitro. Phytomed 2013, 20, 432–5, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23485046.
    OpenUrl
  101. [101].↵
    Navratilova, A.; Nesuta, O.; Vancatova, I.; Cizek, A.; Varela, M. R.; Lopez-Aban, J.; Villa-Pulgarin, J. A.; Mollinedo, F.; Muro, A.; Zemlickova, H.; Kadlecova, D.; Smejkal, K. C-geranylated flavonoids from Paulownia tomentosa fruits with antimicrobial potential and synergistic activity with antibiotics. Pharm Biol 2016, 54, 1398–407, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26789098.
    OpenUrl
  102. [102].
    Lee, D. S.; Je, J. Y. Gallic acid-grafted-chitosan inhibits foodborne pathogens by a membrane damage mechanism. J Agric Food Chem 2013, 61, 6574–9, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23635088.
    OpenUrl
  103. [103].↵
    Zhou, X.; Jia, F.; Liu, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. In vitro synergistic interaction of 5-O-methylglovanon and ampicillin against ampicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates. Arch Pharm Res 2011, 34, 1751–7, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22076775.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  104. [104].↵
    Kyaw, B. M.; Arora, S.; Lim, C. S. Bactericidal antibiotic–phytochemical combinations against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Braz J Microb 2012, 938–945, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24031910.
  105. [105].
    Salin, O.; Pohjala, L.; Saikku, P.; Vuorela, H.; Leinonen, M.; Vuorela, P. Effects of coadministration of natural polyphenols with docycycline or calcium modulators on acute Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in vitro. J Antibiotics 2011, 64, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21934693.
  106. [106].
    Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Liang, Z. Endophytic bacteria from Pinellia ternata, a new source of purine alkaloids and bacterial manure. Pharm Biol 2015, 53, 1545–8, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25868618.
    OpenUrl
  107. [107].
    Obiang-Obounou, B. W.; Kang, O.-H.; Choi, J.-G.; Keum, J.-H.; Kim, S.-B.; Mun, S.-H.; Shin, D.-W.; Kim, K. W.; Park, C.-B.; Kim, Y.-G.; Han, S.-H.; Kwon, D.-Y. The mechanism of action of sanguinarine against methicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Toxicol Sci 2011, 36, 277–283, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21628956.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. [108].
    Kang, H. K.; Kim, H. Y.; Cha, J. D. Synergistic effects between silibinin and antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical specimens. Biotechnol J 2011, 6, 1397–408, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21491604.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  109. [109].
    Lu, X.; Yang, X.; Li, X.; Lu, Y.; Ren, Z.; Zhao, L.; Hu, X.; Jiang, J.; You, X. In vitro activity of sodium new houttuyfonate alone and in combination with oxacillin or netilmicin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 2013, 8, e68053, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23844154.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  110. [110].↵
    Mitchell, G.; Lafrance, M.; Boulanger, S.; Seguin, D. L.; Guay, I.; Gattuso, M.; Marsault, E.; Bouarab, K.; Malouin, F. Tomatidine acts in synergy with aminoglycoside antibiotics against multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus and prevents virulence gene expression. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012, 67, 559–68, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22129590.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  111. [111].↵
    Sule, A.; Ahmed, Q. U.; Latip, J.; Samah, O. A.; Omar, M. N.; Umar, A.; Dogarai, B. B. Antifungal activity of Andrographis paniculata extracts and active principles against skin pathogenic fungal strains in vitro. Pharm Biol 2012, 50, 850–6, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587518.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  112. [112].
    Karioti, A.; Sokovic, M.; Ciric, A.; Koukoulitsa, C.; Bilia, A. R.; Skaltsa, H. Antimicrobial properties of Quercus ilex L. proanthocyanidin dimers and simple phenolics: evaluation of their synergistic activity with conventional antimicrobials and prediction of their pharmacokinetic profile. J Agric Food Chem 2011, 59, 6412–22, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21563833.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  113. [113].
    Wei, G. X.; Xu, X.; Wu, C. D. In vitro synergism between berberine and miconazole against planktonic and biofilm Candida cultures. Arch Oral Biol 2011, 56, 565–72, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21272859.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. [114].↵
    Calixto Junior, J. T.; Morais, S. M.; Martins, C. G.; Vieira, L. G.; Morais-Braga, M. F.; Carneiro, J. N.; Machado, A. J.; Menezes, I. R.; Tintino, S. R.; Coutinho, H. D. Phytochemical analysis and modulation of antibiotic activity by Luehea paniculata Mart. & Zucc. (Malvaceae) in multiresistant clinical isolates of Candida spp. Biomed Res Int 2015, ArtID 807670, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25821822.
Back to top
Posted September 09, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Synergistic effects of natural products and commercial antibiotics—A mini–review 2010–2015
Lucía Nitsch-Velásquez
medRxiv 2020.09.01.20186353; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.01.20186353
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area