Stress symptoms and reactions to COVID-19: A multinational survey from six Asian regions

Introduction

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are severe, not only because of the lives it has cost, but also because of the strict public health measures implemented in most parts of the world. Drastic, immediate and austere public health measures ^1,2 have been enacted in the hope of slowing the pandemic as much as possible. Yet, with the growing magnitude of the traumatic pandemic and the lengthening of tight public health measures, many people are developing symptoms of stress ^3,4. The mental health crisis is undoubtedly worrying for most in Asia, where the novel coronavirus was first discovered and spread.

Few empirical studies have focused on stress symptoms among the public during a pandemic. The most relevant works, from Southeast Asia during the SARS and H1NI outbreaks ^5,6, examined the public’s behavioural responses rather than stress symptoms. Recent studies on stress symptoms due to COVID-19 have focused mainly on either medical workers ^7,8 or survivors ⁹, and others were confined to a local scale¹⁰. The absence of specific knowledge on population-wide stress symptoms during a catastrophic pandemic is troubling for the upcoming mental health crisis, which most assuredly will occur.

This study addressed three key issues. First, we surveyed nationally representative samples to determine the patterns and magnitudes of stress symptoms across six Asian regions since the early wave of COVID-19. Second, we characterised the groups that are vulnerable to stress during this pandemic according to variations in the full sample. Third, we asked about coping behaviours when faced with stress and the other reactions to COVID-19 and tightened public health measures. Thus, this study fills a gap in the literature by presenting a cross-national survey on the mental health of citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Discussion

The results of our cross-national survey show that a remarkably high number of people in all six Asian regions experienced symptoms of stress during the COVID-19 outbreak. Many respondents (59.1%) had been affected substantially by at least one stress symptom since the pandemic outbreak. The situation was particularly worrying in South Korea, where 75.0% of the respondents showed at least one substantial stress symptom. The findings indicate that COVID-19 has extended from a pandemic into a mental well-being crisis in Asia. The prevalent signs of post-traumatic stress – stress, disturbed thoughts or dreams, sleeping problems, trouble concentrating and anger outbursts – pinpoint early diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder in the context of a high hidden cost of strict public health measures and the widespread scale of the COVID-19 outbreak in the selected regions.

A few recent studies have also specified the psychological stress effects of the COVID-19 outbreak. An early study from China conducted in late January reported that 53.8% of the public considered the COVID-19 outbreak as having a moderate or severe psychological impact, and 8.1% of the respondents reported moderate to severe stress levels⁴. Another study from China in mid-February indicated that the trauma level and psychological stress level of the lay public were higher than those of the nurses at the front-line in hospitals¹⁷. A recent report with data collected from April to May implied that 25.4% of people in Hong Kong reported a deterioration in their mental health during the pandemic¹⁰. Our results indicate that psychological stress in major Asian regions may have shown exponential growth between February and May. This signifies that the combination of the pandemic itself and the stringent public health measures and social distancing might have caused the mass spread of stress and panic. A moderate level of stress and panic promotes alertness to developments and obedience to COVID-19–related protective habits such as wearing masks and washing hands¹⁸. However, a prolonged state of traumatic stress may not help in dealing with the long-term threat.

We also compared our stress figures with those from previous disasters. Data from a few days after the September 11 attacks in 2001 suggested that the proportion of the US population that experienced substantial stress symptoms was only half the proportion of the Asian population during the COVID-19 outbreak¹². Another study on the Oklahoma City bombing attack in 1995 indicated that the stress symptoms surveyed under our study were about half the level of those who survived the direct blast of that bombing event ¹⁹. Methodological discrepancies might have generated potential error in such comparisons, but our results indicate that by May 2020, COVID-19 had driven stress symptoms to a disastrous level among the Asian public.

In particular, our results indicate a surging risk of anger outbursts (31.1%) in underprivileged young urban families with children. Such frustration and irritation could easily fuel potential conflict. In Asian metropolitan cities such as Hong Kong, limited living space has been a challenge for families during the city lockdown. Isolation, paired with psychological stressors and an economic downturn, can combine to trigger domestic violence on an unprecedented scale^20,21.

The risk of substantial stress symptoms varied according to the respondents’ demographic backgrounds. The catastrophe seems to have had a more pronounced stress effect on citizens who are young, educated, live in urban areas and have a high socio-economic status. Stress symptoms were also more prevalent among those who had a history of chronic illness or mental illness, lived with a pregnant woman, an adult older than 65 years or a child younger than 12 years. There are three possible reasons for such a pattern. First, young and educated individuals have been deluged with information and messages during this pandemic, leading to elevated stress. Second, when pension and housing wealth of urban richer groups were taking a big hit during the pandemic, in short run the immediate impact of the crisis might seem more devastating to the rich people in cities ²². Yet, other reports also suspected socially disadvantaged individuals should have a disproportionate likelihood of being affected by COVID-19 ²³. Third, individuals with limited immune capacity, stress capacity or mobility were more likely to experience greater fear and extra stressors than the others ²⁴. These predictors allowed us to identify vulnerable groups to formulate a strategic response plan to the public panic crisis during a pandemic.

Our survey also indicated that the level of stress was positively associated with the average number of hours a day spent viewing COVID-19-related information. Traditionally, the threat appraisal model holds that viewing information can be a positive coping mechanism for predicting outcomes in the face of risk and uncertainty ²⁵. However, recent studies have noted that the vast amount of online information available in the digital era and the excessive use of social media during the pandemic could contribute to cyberchondria and information overload^26,27, which could further generate confusion and stress.

The stress coping behaviour of the Asian respondents showed a statistically significant relationship with stress. They tended to prepare safety equipment and extra daily commodities, to adopt a healthier lifestyle or to follow government-issued public health guidelines and orders to cope with their stress. Taking such constructive actions suggests that Asian people try to reduce uncertainty to cope with stress and anxiety ²⁸. The respondents also tended to show voluntary responses amidst the pandemic. Previous reports indicated that helping from the victims of a tragedy from distant is regarded as a collective social response in coping with the aftermath of trauma ^12,29. A further study found that compassion was regarded as an active process through which people show kindness and support, which, in turn, can serve as an intervention for their depression or anxiety³⁰.

This study has limitations. The study design did not incorporate a full assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder and thus may have underestimated the respondents’ level of stress or trauma. However, the strength of this study is the stress symptom data obtained from a vast population across six Asian regions differentially affected by the COVID-19 outbreak and with different responses to the pandemic. The data from our study contribute to a growing evidence base regarding the mental health crisis that is spreading along with the pandemic. Previous studies of disaster suggest that most stress symptoms fade over time, especially in those who experience the trauma indirectly. However, the current COVID-19 pandemic presented a chronic hazard with waves of overlapping outbreaks rather than a single acute one. Many people are unable to cope with uncertainty and stress for weeks and months. This can ultimately lead to exhaustion and depression, which could amplify the impact of COVID-19 and jeopardise decision-making when combating the pandemic. Although this is unlikely to anticipate the endpoint of the current COVID-19 pandemic, we call for additional early detection, intervention, public health resources and policy focus for those who are most vulnerable to stress and post-traumatic stress disorder. The global society must prepare for this storm.