Abstract
Life expectancy differences across racial/ethnic and economic groups persist in the U.S., but little is known about the combined effects of racial and income segregation in explaining old age survival across neighborhoods. We operationalized neighborhoods using census tracts, with 65,655 of them nested within 3,015 counties, nested within 49 states. We linked census track life table data for ages 45-74 (n=196,965) from the National Vital Statistics System with 5-year population estimates (2011-2015) stratified by race/ethnicity and income from the American Community Survey. We measured racial/ethnic and income segregation using the Index of Concentration of the Extremes at the census tract level, and the indexes of dissimilarity and exposure at the county level. Using three-level random intercept models, we assessed the direct and contextual relationship between survival at ages 45-74 with racial/ethnic and income segregation. Regardless of racial/ethnic stratification, a high concentration of neighborhood poverty was associated with a lower probability of survival relative to affluent neighborhoods (−4.83%; 95% CI −4.86, −4.79), although the relationship was larger in neighborhoods with high concentration of Blacks (−5.61%; −5.67, −5.54). Black-white county-level unevenness also had the largest negative association in those neighborhoods (−0.26%; −0.32, −0.20). Furthermore, Black isolation was negatively associated with a lower survival probability (−0.21%; −0.29, −0.13), but Hispanic isolation was positively associated (0.23%; 0.16, 0.30). Opposite relationships resulted from Black-White (0.06; −0.01, 0.14) and Hispanic-White (−0.13; −0.21, −0.05) interactions. Finally, high exposure to neighborhood poverty/affluence was associated with lower/higher probability of neighborhood survival, but the associations were the strongest for Blacks.
Significance Racial/ethnic and income residential segregation have been associated with negative health outcomes and increased risk of mortality in the U.S. We tested the association between residential segregation at different geographic levels with the survival probability at ages 45-74 across rural/urban neighborhoods. Results indicate that the racial/ethnic and income geographic composition of the population are important factors for explaining this relationship. That is, poverty concentration, minority-white unevenness, and exposure to poverty, had detrimental outcomes for all communities, irrespective of their racial/ethnic composition. However, while minority-isolation/-exposure to whites is detrimental/protective for Black communities, the opposite happened in Hispanic communities. Our research provides important insights in understanding the extent to which residential segregation explains survival disparities across neighborhoods based on their race/ethnicity composition.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute On Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P30AG059307. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The corresponding author had full access to all the data and had final responsibility to submit the paper for publication. Data for this project were accessed using the Stanford Center for Population Health Sciences Data Core. The PHS Data Core is supported by a National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Science Clinical and Translational Science Award (UL1 TR001085) and from Internal Stanford funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
N/A
