A Systematic Review of the Cardiovascular Manifestations and Outcomes in the Setting of Coronavirus-19 Disease

Samarthkumar Thakkar, Shilpkumar Arora, Ashish Kumar, Rahul Jaswaney, Mohammed Faisaluddin, Mohammad Ammad Ud Din, Mariam Shariff, Kirolos Barssoum, Harsh P Patel, Arora Nirav, Chinmay Jani, Sejal Savani, Christopher DeSimone, Siva Mulpuru, Abhishek Deshmukh
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.09.20171330

ABSTRACT

The impact of coronavirus disease, 2019 (COVID-19), has been profound. Though COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system, it has also been associated with a wide range of cardiovascular (CV) manifestations portending extremely poor prognosis. The principal hypothesis for CV involvement is through direct myocardial infection and systemic inflammation. We conducted a systematic review of the current literature to provide a foundation for understanding the CV manifestations and outcomes of COVID-19. PubMed and EMBASE databases were electronically searched from the inception of the databases through April 27th, 2020. A second literature review was conducted to include major trials and guidelines that were published after the initial search but before submission. The inclusion criteria for studies to be eligible were case reports, case series, and observation studies reporting CV outcomes among patients with COVID-19 infection. This review of the current COVID-19 disease and CV outcomes literature revealed a myriad of CV manifestations with potential avenues for treatment and prevention. Future studies are required to understand on a more mechanistic level the effect of COVID-19 on the myocardium and thus provide avenues to improve mortality and morbidity.

INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has affected ~ 19 million people worldwide since its outbreak in Wuhan, China 1,2. COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system leading to severe hypoxia and often progresses to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)3. COVID-19 has also been associated with a range of cardiovascular (CV) manifestations and mortality 4–9. Despite former reports, the full spectrum of CV manifestations of COVID-19 remains incompletely understood. Alarmingly, COVID-19 can be associated with severe cases of fulminant myocarditis, cardiogenic shock, thromboembolic events, and sudden cardiac death 10–18.

The clinical presentation, pathophysiology, outcome, and management of CV manifestation among COVID-19 continues to evolve at a rapid rate 19–22. We have conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine and summarize the best published data on the CV manifestations of COVID-19.

METHODS

Search Strategy and Study Eligibility

PubMed and EMBASE databases were electronically searched from the inception of the databases through April 27th, 2020. A second literature review was conducted to include major trials and guidelines that occurred after this date but before submission. The various search strategies for each database are detailed in the Supplementary Appendix. Cross-references of retrieved publications, review articles, and guidelines were appraised to ensure the inclusion of all relevant studies. A total of 810 articles (Pubmed-572 and EMBASE-238) were identified from the database search, and 15 articles were manually included. The PRISMA flow chart for the inclusion of studies is presented in Figure 1. The searched citations were reviewed for eligibility independently by two reviewers (S.T. and A.K.), first by titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review of filtered articles. The inclusion criteria for studies to be eligible were case reports, case series, and observation studies reporting CV outcomes among patients with COVID-19 infection. Figure 2 summarises the major CV manifestations caused by COVID-19.

Figure 1:
Figure 1:

PRISMA flow chart for studies inclusion

Figure 2:
Figure 2:

Summary of major cardiovascular manifestations in COVID-19

COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Manifestations

Acute Cardiac Injury and Myocarditis

Cardiac injury and inflammation among patients with COVID-19 have been frequently reported, though the pathophysiology and mechanism remain poorly understood. Previous reports have postulated that direct injury to the myocardium by viral infection may lead to cardiac injury and inflammation6. It has been proposed that the primary mechanism of SARSCoV-2 entry into host cells is via angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, which are expressed abundantly in the heart and lung tissue 19. Another leading hypothesis for the mechanism of cardiac injury is the systemic release of various pro-inflammatory cytokines which may trigger cardiac injury, such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), beta interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1A, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α as well as IL-6 23. A post-mortem study of myocardial tissue from a deceased COVID-19 patient supported the hypothesis of systemic inflammation as the likely driver for cardiac injury 24. Additionally, the analysis of myocardial tissue exhibited a small amount of inflammatory infiltration of myocardial interstitial monocytes without substantial myocardial damage24. However, a study investigating 112 hospitalized COVID-19 patients suggested that cardiac injury was attributed to systemic cytokines rather than direct damage25.

COVID-19 related myocarditis can manifest across all age groups without a previous history of cardiovascular disease; thus, early identification and diagnosis are crucial7,10,11,26. Studies have estimated an incidence ranging from 19% to as high as 27.8% based on abnormal ECG findings, elevations in troponin (Tn) I, or surges in TnT levels 4,5,27. A study by Huang et al. highlighted that acute cardiac injury was diagnosed in 5 of 41 (12%) COVID-19 patients, characterized by a surge of high sensitivity cardiac troponin-I (hs-cTnI) (> 28 ng / L)28. Cardiac involvement was also noted in patients who recovered from COVID-19. Of 26 recovered patients who reported cardiac symptoms, 58% of patients had abnormal MRI findings of myocardial edema and late gadolinium enhancement29.

Patients with suspected cardiac injury from COVID-19 often present with chest pain alongside other viral systemic symptoms, including fever, cough, and/or dyspnea 7,11. Primary tools to aid the diagnosis include a 12-lead ECG, cardiac biomarkers, as well as echocardiographic imaging. The 12-lead ECG may demonstrate a more extensive range of findings, including low voltage, diffuse ST-segment elevation, T-wave inversion, PR segment depression as well as new Q waves4,7,9. An echocardiogram shows diffuse myocardial dyskinesia and a reduction in ejection fraction7,11. RV function has been identified as a frequent finding, and importantly, as a powerful indicator of morbidity and mortality32. In a study by Argulian et al., in which 110 COVID-19 cases had an echocardiographic review, the authors noted right ventricular dilation in 31% of patients 30. Furthermore, a study by Li et al. demonstrated that patients with the highest right ventricular longitudinal strain quartile had an increased risk of elevated D-dimer and CRP levels, acute cardiac injury, ARDS, deep vein thrombosis as well as mortality compared to those in the lowest quartile31.

Patients presenting with COVID-19 associated cardiac injury and inflammation demonstrated significantly worsened in-hospital complications and outcomes 4,5,32. Patients with cardiac injury required noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation more often ([46.3% vs.3.9%; P < .001) and [22.0% vs. 4.2%; P < .001] respectively) as compared to patients without cardiac injury. Associated rates of ARDS (58.5% vs. 14.7%; P < .001) were also increased. Other complications, such as acute kidney injury (8.5% vs. 0.3%), electrolyte imbalance (15.9% vs. 5.1%), and coagulation disorders (7.3% vs. 1.8%), were significantly higher among patients with an additional cardiac injury with COVID-19 disease4.

Life-threatening arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) (17.3% vs. 2%), were also significantly higher among patients with COVID-19 associated cardiac injury5. Additionally, a remarkably higher mortality rate of 51% versus 4.5% and 59.6% versus 8.9% were reported in two studies, among patients with cardiac injury as opposed to patients without cardiac injury, respectively4,5. The summary of included studies on COVID-19 related cardiac injury is described in Table 1.

There is no regimented treatment for COVID-19, including its cardiovascular insults. To date, trial medications have been used as an attempt to limit direct viral infection and reduce systemic inflammation5–7,33,34. Antivirals form the core of treatment and include interferon beta as well as lopinavir/ritonavir. Additional strategies to reduce systemic inflammation include the use of glucocorticoids and immunoglobulins to modulate immunological response and cytokine storm. These treatments may be augmented by creatine phosphate and coenzyme Q10 drugs, which have hypothesized to potentially improve myocardial metabolism during infection6. Monitoring for electrolyte disturbances has also been utilized to reduce associated complications 5,6. Hongde Hu et al. presented a case of COVID-19 patient presenting with fulminant myocarditis and cardiogenic shock with marked clinical improvement after treatment with corticosteroid and immunoglobulin within three weeks34. Further evaluation of these patients also revealed improvement in left ventricular systolic function as well as cardiac biomarker normalization34. Another case study of fulminant myocarditis due to COVID-19 displayed remarkable recovery by the fifth day after treatment with immunoglobulins (80 mg/d) for four days followed by methylprednisolone (500 mg/d) combined with antiviral therapy and including interferon-beta (0.25 mg/48 h) and ritonavir/lopinavir (400 mg/100 mg/12 h)33. One of the cases reported clinical and hemodynamic benefit with the high dose aspirin (500 mg twice daily), intravenous methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg daily for three days), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (200 mg twice daily), and lopinavir/ritonavir (two tablets of 200/50 mg twice daily)7. It must be cautioned that data regarding treatments have primarily relied on case studies and small retrospective studies, making it difficult to interpret, assess causality, and extrapolate results.

The prognosis of patients with cardiac injury associated with COVID-19 is poor. Previous studies suggest that an uptrending cardiac biomarkers may signal a worsening prognosis5,6,25. Among these markers, TnT, high sensitivity amino-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (hsNT-proBNP), c-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatinine kinase (CK) levels have demonstrated prognostic value6. Tao Guo et al. documented TnT and hsNT-proBNP levels increased significantly during the course of hospitalization among those who ultimately died, but no dynamic changes were observed among the survivors5. A study encompassing 1,099 COVID-19 patients across 552 hospitals in China substantiated a higher expression of cardiac biomarkers among the critically ill subjects 35. Another study by Qing Deng et al. including 112 COVID-19 hospitalized patients, 42 (37.5%) patients had elevated cardiac biomarkers throughout hospitalization, and in the week preceding death25. A retrospective study involving 138 COVID-19 patients determined that CKMB, LDH, and hs-cTnI level among severe cases admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were considerably higher as compared to mild non-ICU cases36. Given this observed value, testing for cardiac biomarkers as part of the initial lab work seems reasonable for both diagnosis and prognostication of patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Acute Coronary Syndrome and Myocardial infarction

Indirectly, the pandemic of COVID-19 has had a profound effect on the management of myocardial infarction (MI)37. In a retrospective study by Stefanini et al., 24 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients among 28 presented with STEMI as initial symptoms, whereas the other 4 patients developed STEMI during hospitalization. Out of 28 patients, 17 patients (60.7%) had evidence of a culprit lesion and required revascularization. Hospital course was associated with death in 11 patients (39.3%), and 16 (57.1%) had been discharged38. A study by Tam et al. noted that patients with STEMI in Hong Kong experienced a significant delay in door to needle time attributed to precautions related to COVID-19. Another study indicated that patients with MI had complicated in-hospital course and worse clinical outcome during the COVID-19 pandemic 37. This delay in MI care can be attributed to multiple competing factors, including screening procedures for COVID-19 before the intervention, delay in intervention with donning additional personal protective devices to prevent transmission to healthcare workers, saturated emergency medical service capacity, and delay in presentation due to fear among patients of contracting COVID-19.

The treatment of acute coronary syndrome in COVID-19 patients is controversial. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) states the probable role of fibrinolytics in patients with low-risk STEMI (defined by inferior STEMI with no right ventricular involvement or lateral MI without hemodynamic compromise), with percutaneous intervention as the preferred treatment modality for other patients with STEMI. Further recommendations suggest in selected NSTEMI patients with confirmed COVID-19, conservative therapy may be sufficient39.

Arrhythmia

Arrhythmia is frequently associated with COVID-19 infection. A study by Wang et al. on 138 patients with COVID-19 documented any arrhythmia as a complication in 16.7% of the patients36. Among patients who required ICU admission, 44.4% of the patients developed any arrhythmia in comparison to only 6.9% of the patients without intensive care admission36. Guo T et al. studied 187 patients with COVID-19 infection, VT/VF was documented in 5.9% of the patients. Another study by Colon et al. evaluating atrial tachyarrhythmia in COVID-19 patients demonstrated 16.5% of patients developed atrial tachyarrhythmia, and among them, atrial fibrillation was the most common (63%)40. Patients with atrial tachyarrhythmia had higher concentrations of CRP and D-dimer compared to those without atrial tachyarrhythmia41. Patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes were noted to be at higher risk as they are more susceptible to the arrhythmogenic effect of direct viral infection or related therapy42,43. Notably, COVID-19 patients with elevated Tn were at a higher risk of malignant arrhythmia (VT/VF) as compared to patients with normal Tn5.

Besides direct infection leading to arrhythmia, antimalarial drugs used for treatment, including chloroquine and HCQ, can precipitate polymorphic VT/VF by prolonging QT interval44. The logistics involved in getting a 12 lead ECG lead to concerns raised by repeated exposure of healthcare workers and the use of PPEs. Chang et al. studied the benefit of using mobile outpatient telemetry on nontelemetric floors for 117 consecutive COVID-19 positive patients on HCQ ± azithromycin. Throughout their hospitalization, there were 28 urgent alerts for 15 patients, with atrial fibrillation with the rapid ventricular response being the most common arrhythmia and five alerts for extension of QTc beyond 500ms45. QT monitoring is also being pursued by using wearables46. As per expert recommendations, QT-prolonging drugs, including HCQ and azithromycin, should be avoided in patients with baseline QTc >=500 ms. For patients receiving these therapies, recommendations include monitoring daily QTc, withdrawing drugs if it exceeds 500 ms, and maintaining potassium to a level greater than 4 mEq/l and magnesium greater than 2 mEq/l47.

Cardiac arrest

There have been reports of cardiac arrest among young adults with COVID-19 infection48. A cross-sectional study of 136 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest18 indicated that 87.5% of patients developed cardiac arrest attributed to hypoxia18. The initial rhythm during the arrest was asystole in 89.7% of patients, followed by VF/VT in 5.9% of patients, and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in 4.4%18. Among the 136 patients, the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 18 (13.2%) patients, of which four patients were alive at 30 days follow-up, and only one patient could obtain a favorable neurological outcome at the end of 30 days. VF/VT had better outcomes as compared to asystole or PEA18.

Cardiac tamponade

Patients with COVID-19 have also presented with cardiac tamponade often without myocardial involvement49,50. Hua A et al. described a case of COVID-19 presenting as myopericarditis with supportive ECG findings demonstrating sinus tachycardia and concave inferolateral ST elevation with a simultaneous Tn surge. As disease developed, this patient began to experience hypotension and evidence of cardiac tamponade that was relieved with pericardiocentesis49. Dabbagh MF et al. documented a case of a massive hemorrhagic cardiac tamponade without myocardial involvement evidenced by the absence of ECG changes or Tn elevation50. The pathophysiology is poorly understood but is hypothesized to be driven by an inflammatory response and cytotoxic effect by a viral infection on pericardial tissue7.

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy

COVID-19 pandemic has triggered stress-induced cardiomyopathy, also known as takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM)51,52. Two cases reporting TCM were seen in elderly females presenting with sudden onset substernal chest pain. ECG demonstrated a septal q-ST pattern in V1-V3 in one case and diffuse T wave inversions in other. The coronary angiogram revealed nonobstructive lesions; however, basal hyperkinesis and apical ballooning were noted in the left ventriculogram, consistent with TCM. Both patients reported extreme stress induced by the current pandemic. Both patients recovered without any complications, and repeat echocardiogram showed near-complete recovery.

Cardiovascular thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism

Several reports of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) exacerbating respiratory failure emerged early in the development of pandemic53,54. These reports were supported by radiological and histological evidence of thrombosis53,54. In a study of 2,003 consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19, 100 of 280 hospitalized patients underwent CT chest with contrast due to signs of clinical decompensation, and 23% of the patients were found to have a pulmonary embolism (PE)53. Another study of 107 confirmed COVID-19 patients demonstrated that 20.6% developed PE 54. Moreover, the risk of PE among COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU was two-fold compared to patients hospitalized in ICU for other causes 54. Further post-mortem studies have demonstrated DVT in 7 of 12 patients (58%) where PE was attributed to the cause of death in 4 patients55. Another post-mortem case series by Lax et al. of 11 COVID-19 positive patients identified thrombosis of small and medium-sized pulmonary arteries in 11 patients, associated with pulmonary infarction in 8 patients56. The development of thromboembolism is associated with grave complications and poor prognosis 15,53,54,57,58. Patients with PE required a higher rate of mechanical ventilation and ICU admission, had ARDS, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), RV failure, and tricuspid regurgitation15,53,54,58.

The increased risk of thrombotic events among these patients has been attributed to the downstream activation of inflammatory cytokine storm 59–61. This severe systemic inflammation is postulated to create a pro-coagulant environment through the release of ILs and TNF-α via activated endothelium and macrophages as a result of hypoxia from acute lung injury. The conglomerate of an inflammatory storm, venous stasis from immobilization during hospitalization, and the hypercoagulability caused by treatment with glucocorticoids and immunoglobulins act in synergy to promote clot formation59–61. In a post-mortem study, the role of complement-mediated pulmonary vascular damage and the creation of a prothrombotic environment was evident in 5 COVID-19 cases 62. Immunohistological examination of the pulmonary microvasculature revealed depositions of terminal complement components C5b-9 (membrane attack complex), C4d, and mannose-binding lectin (MBL)-associated serine protease (MASP)62. Other immunohistological findings revealed extensive deposition of fibrinogen (FBG) and pro-coagulant complement proteins in the inter-alveolar septal capillaries with fibrinoid necrosis. Inflammatory vascular damage incited by the various ILs and complement proteins leads to the creation of a prothrombotic environment leading to thrombosis 62.

A study by Spiezia et al. evaluated the coagulation profile of acutely ill patients admitted in the ICU with COVID-1963. Of the 22 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, all of them had markedly elevated D-dimer (mean >= 5000ng/dl) and FBG level (mean >= 500 mg/dl) along with significantly shorter clot formation time and higher maximum clot firmness compared to the control group. No significant derangement in PT/aPTT or INR was observed. In one observational study by Leonard-lonard et al., 32 of 106 (30%, [95%CI 22-40%]) COVID-19 patients were positive for acute PE on pulmonary CT angiograms with a D-dimer higher baseline threshold of 2660 µg/L64. A study by Cui et al. found that an elevated D-dimer level was associated with the development of VTE65. Similar trends were reported by Tang et al., who assessed the differences in coagulation markers between survivors and non-survivors with COVID-19. In this study, D-dimer and fibrin degradation product (FDP) levels were elevated to 3.5x and 1.9x, respectively, in the non-survivors compared to survivors66.

Biomarkers signaling thrombophilia, such as D-dimer and thrombocytopenia, have been implicated as important prognostic markers. An observational study noted that elevated values in D-dimer (10.36 vs. 0.26 ng/L; P < 0.001) and FBG (5.02 vs. 2.90 g/L; P < 0.001) were higher among COVID-19 patients and was associated with poor prognosis 67. In a study of 199 COVID‐19 patients, a D‐dimer value above 1 μg/ml was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 18.4 for in‐hospital mortality67. Fei Zhou et al. seemed to substantiate this value with a noted increased odds of in-hospital death associated with D-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64–128·55; p=0·0033)67. Similarly, Zhang L et al. noted D‐dimer levels ≥2.0 µg/ml had a higher incidence of mortality compared to those with D‐dimer levels <2.0 µg/ml (12/67 vs. 1/267, P<0.001, HR: 51.5, 95% CI: 12.9‐206.7) in their study of 343 COVID-19 patients68. The clinical correlates of these findings seem to portend poor outcomes as observed in a study by Li Zhang et al. This study observed an increased rate of death (34.8% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.001) and a decreased rates of patients discharged (48.5% vs. 77.9%, P < 0.001) 56 69. Another study of 48 COVID-19 positive cases, a trend towards increased mortality rates were found in the DVT group compared to the non-DVT group (28.6% in o DVT group, 27.8% in distal, 60% in proximal DVT group;P=0.43)70. Often in conjunction, thrombocytopenia has been observed frequently among patients with VTE. A meta-analysis by Lippi et al. demonstrated a lower platelet count in patients with severe disease (mean difference: −31 × 109/L, 95% CI: - 35 to - 29 × 109/L). Additionally, thrombocytopenia was associated with higher odds of having a severe respiratory disease (OR: 5.13; 95% CI: 1.81–14.58) 71. Based on the growing evidence of D-dimer as a prognostic indicator, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) has suggested that hospital admission should be considered even in the absence of other symptoms suggesting disease severity, as this signifies increased thrombin generation 72.

The use of thromboprophylaxis in this subset of patients was associated with better outcomes, as shown by Tang et al. in their evaluation of 449 patients with COVID-1966. Patients on prophylaxis-dose low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) with sepsis-induced coagulopathy score ≥4x or D-dimer ≥ 6x normal upper limit had a significantly lower 28-day mortality rate compared to those, not on anticoagulation 66. There have been further questions as to whether standard thromboprophylaxis is sufficient to prevent VTE in COVID-19 patients. In a study of 184 ICU patients, nearly 40% of patients were confirmed to have VTE by diagnosis, and 3.7% also developed arterial thrombosis73. All of the patients were on a standard weight-based dose of thromboprophylaxis, indicating a potential need for higher dose thromboprophylaxis in the ICU setting73. In a case series of 16 patients, after increasing the anticoagulation, no incidences of thromboembolic events were reported 74. Another study of 26 consecutive patients with severe COVID-19, eight patients (31%) were treated with prophylactic anticoagulation, and 18 patients (69%) received therapeutic anticoagulation75. The proportion of VTE was significantly higher in patients who received prophylactic anticoagulation compared to the other group (100% vs. 56%, respectively, p=0.03)75. Moore et al. suggested the possible use of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) in COVID-19-induced ARDS with severe hypoxia where extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is not a possibility76. A case series of 3 COVID-19 patients who were administered t-PA suffering from ARDS and respiratory failure was reported to demonstrate an initial improvement in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in all three cases77. This improvement was transient and disappeared after completion of the t-PA treatment77. Table 2 summarises the included studies on COVID-19 and thromboembolism.

An aggressive thromboprophylaxis of COVID-19 patients seems justified unless patients are at increased risk of bleeding74. The recent recommendations by ISTH underline the need for coagulation monitoring and LMWH therapy in patients treated with antithrombotic agents 72. A study of 138 critical-ill patients with confirmed COVID-19 with a high risk of thrombosis noted that 60% of these patients were also at high risk for bleeding. This study reported 20% of critically ill patients developed VTE despite the use of standard weight-based thromboprophylaxis, and 26.7% of the critically ill patients also suffered from a bleeding event 59. In a study by Testa et al., patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and antiviral drugs at the same time showed an alarming increase in DOAC plasma levels. This prompted providers to restrain from the use of DOACs from patients with COVID-19 in favor of alternative parenteral antithrombotic strategies as long as antiviral agents were deemed necessary 78. Further confounding our understanding, a study by Paranjpe et al. evaluating treatment dose anticoagulation (AC) revealed that rate of bleeding risk (3% vs. 1.9%) and invasive mechanical ventilation (29.8% vs. 8.1%) was significantly higher among those who received treatment dose AC compared to those who did not, with almost similar mortality rate (22.5% vs. 22.8%)79. The balance of these factors has made it difficult to determine the optimal dosing of anticoagulation.

Balancing the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in COVID-19 patients has prompted hospitals to revise their use of thromboprophylaxis. The Swiss consensus statement and the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) made recommendations on the use of VTE thromboprophylaxis80. These recommendations advocated using treatment doses with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or LMWH in all hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the absence of bleeding complications. These recommendations further suggested considering escalated dose thromboprophylaxis in ICU patients or cases with grossly elevated D-dimer levels and/or morbid obesity (>100 kg)80. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) also recognized the possibility of pulmonary microvascular thrombosis aggravating the degree of respiratory failure. The ASH recommendations noted that evidence for the empiric use of full-dose anticoagulation in such cases is lacking, and the decision to initiate escalated dose thromboprophylaxis should be balanced with bleeding risk, especially in older patients or those with liver or renal disease81. The ideal approach to thromboprophylaxis regarding dosage is nebulous, with emerging evidence pointing towards an aggressive approach in hospitalized patients with the possible addition of serial lower extremity doppler sonograms in critically ill patients 81 More studies are needed to determine the optimum short and long term antithrombotic therapeutic strategies82.

Stroke

COVID-19 disease has been associated with the potential to cause neurological injury and CNS symptoms83,84. The marked inflammatory and procoagulant state have been associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications85. A retrospective study of 214 patients in Wuhan, China demonstrated six patients developed acute cerebrovascular disease, five patients developed ischemic stroke, and one patient hemorrhagic stroke83. A case study by Sharifi-Razavi et al. documented the clinical course of a patient with acute loss of consciousness, later found to have acute subarachnoid hemorrhage with positive COVID-19 infection86. Recently, a case series described five patients who were less than 50 years of age with COVID19 positive status, presenting with symptoms of large-vessel ischemic stroke87. For comparison, the authors noted the same facility only treated an average of 0.73 patients younger than 50 years of age with large vessel ischemic stroke every two weeks over the previous 12 months 87.

Advanced age, severe infection, history of hypertension, diabetes, and cerebrovascular disease, markedly elevated inflammatory and procoagulant markers such as CRP and D-dimers, have been associated with a higher risk in the development of cerebrovascular disease85. Though the mechanism remains unclear, it has been suggested that ACE-2 receptor expression on vascular endothelial cells88 and SARS-CoV-2 binding may lead to high blood pressure response together with pro-inflammatory and procoagulant state increasing the risk of ischemic events84. Neural ACE-2 dysfunction in combination with thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysfunction could be implicated as leading to disruption of blood pressure autoregulation and explain hemorrhagic stroke 84,86.

CONCLUSIONS

This review of current COVID-19 disease and CV outcomes literature revealed a myriad of cardiovascular manifestations, with potential avenues for treatment and prevention. Future studies are necessary to understand on a more mechanistic level, the effect of COVID-19 on the myocardium and vasculature, thus providing avenues to improve morbidity and mortality.

Data Availability

This Systematic review does not contain any original patient data.

ABBREVATIONS
ACI
acute cardiac injury
hs-c-Tn
high-sensitivity cardiac troponin
ICU
intensive care unit
CK
creatine kinase
LDH
lactate dehydrogenase
CK-MB
creatine kinase- myocardial band
ARDS
acute respiratory distress syndrome
AKI
acute kidney injury
NT-proBNP
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide
VT/VF
ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation
CRP
c-reactive protein
HF
heart failure
RV
right ventricle
AT
atrial tachyarrhythmia
ECG
electrocardiogram
STEMI
st elevation myocardial infarction
PEA
pulseless electrical activity
PE
pulmonary embolism
FBG
fibrinogen
ICU
intensive care unit
CTA
computed tomography angiography
APTT
activated partial thromboplastin time
VTE
venous thromboembolism
PT
prothrombin time
DIC
disseminated intravascular coagulation
DVT
deep venous thrombosis
hs-c-TnI
high sensitivity cardiac troponin I
CK-MB
creatine kinase- myocardial band
BNP
brain natriuretic peptide
P/F
ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen
Tn
troponin
t-PA
tissue plasminogen activator
CVA
cerebrovascular accident

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge the contribution of Vidhi Naik, an engineer at Walmart, in designing the central image.

Footnotes

  • Funding: None

  • Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

  • The author's name updated.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Anon. Home - Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. Available at: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/. Accessed May 9, 2020.
  2. 2.↵
    Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, Zaki SR, Peret T, Emery S, Tong S, Urbani C, Comer JA, Lim W, Rollin PE, Dowell SF, Ling A-E, Humphrey CD, Shieh W-J, Guarner J, Paddock CD, Rota P, Fields B, DeRisi J, Yang J-Y, Cox N, Hughes JM, LeDuc JW, Bellini WJ, Anderson LJ. A Novel Coronavirus Associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1953–1966. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa030781.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, Huang H, Zhang L, Zhou X, Du C, Zhang Y, Song J, Wang S, Chao Y, Yang Z, Xu J, Zhou X, Chen D, Xiong W, Xu L, Zhou F, Jiang J, Bai C, Zheng J, Song Y. Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994.
  4. 4.↵
    Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, Gong W, Liu X, Liang J, Zhao Q, Huang H, Yang B, Huang C, S. S,M. Q,B. S, Y. C, T. L, F. Y, W. G, X. L, J. L, Q. Z, H. H,B. Y,C. H, Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, Gong W, Liu X, Liang J, Zhao Q, Huang H, Yang B, Huang C. Association of Cardiac Injury with Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631382631.
  5. 5.↵
    T. G, Y. F,M. C, X. WWW, L. Z, T. H, H. W, J. W, X. WWW, Z. L, Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, Wang H, Wan J, Wang X, Lu Z, T. G, Y. F, M. C, X. WWW, L. Z, T. H, H. W, J. W, X. WWW, Z. L, Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, Wang H, Wan J, Wang X, Lu Z. Cardiovascular Implications of Fatal Outcomes of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631345247.
  6. 6.↵
    X.W. H, J.S. L, J. C, M.W. W, Y.J. L, Z.C. X, C. X, S.S. L, H.S. Z, He XW, Lai JS, Cheng J, Wang MW, Liu YJ, Xiao ZC, Xu C, Li SS, Zeng HS. Impact of complicated myocardial injury on the clinical outcome of severe or critically ill COVID-19 patients. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2020;48:E011–E011. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631256287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    R.M. I, L. L, G. Z, L. I, M. R, D. T, D.S.C, M. C, D. F, E. G, R.M, M. A, E. A, G. S, C.M. L, M. M, Inciardi RM, Lupi L, Zaccone G, Italia L, Raffo M, Tomasoni D, Cani DS, Cerini M, Farina D, Gavazzi E, Maroldi R, Adamo M, Ammirati E, Sinagra G, Lombardi CM, Metra M, I, L. L, G. Z, L. I, M. R, D. T, D.S. C,M. C, D. F, E. G, R. M,M. A,E. A, G. S, C.M. L, M, Inciardi RM, Lupi L, et al. Cardiac Involvement in a Patient with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631345509.
  8. 8.
    Wang L, He WB, Yu XM, Liu HF, Zhou WJ, Jiang H. [Prognostic value of myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2020;56:E009–E009.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    Irabien-Ortiz A. [Fulminant myocarditis due to COVID-19]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2020.
  10. 10.↵
    Doyen D, Moceri P, Ducreux D, Dellamonica J. Myocarditis in a patient with COVID-19: a cause of raised troponin and ECG changes. Lancet (London, England) 2020.
  11. 11.↵
    J.-H. Z, Y.-X. L, J. Y, F.-X. W, W.-B. W, J.-X. L, L.-F. W, H. G, Y. W, C.-F. D, Y.-J. L, X.-J. X, C. F, L. L, Zeng J-H, Liu Y-X, Yuan J, Wang F-X, Wu W-B, Li J-X, Wang L-F, Gao H, Wang Y, Dong C-F, Li Y-J, Xie X-J, Feng C, Liu L. First case of COVID-19 complicated with fulminant myocarditis: a case report and insights. Infection 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L2004612504.
  12. 12.
    C. C, J.T. Y, N. Z, J.P. Z, D.W. W, Chen C, Chen C, Yan JT, Zhou N, Zhao JP, Wang DW. Analysis of myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19 and association between concomitant cardiovascular diseases and severity of COVID-19. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2020;48:E008–E008. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631208820.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.
    Foch E, Allou N, Vitry T, Masse L, Allyn J, Andre M, Allou N. Pulmonary embolism in returning traveler with COVID-19 pneumonia. J Travel Med 2020.
  14. 14.
    G.B. D, M. L, G. G, E. G, Danzi GB, Loffi M, Galeazzi G, Gherbesi E. Acute pulmonary embolism and COVID-19 pneumonia: a random association? Eur Heart J 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631413133.
  15. 15.↵
    Ullah W, Saeed R, Sarwar U, Patel R, Fischman DL. COVID-19 complicated by Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Right-Sided Heart Failure. JACC Case reports 2020.
  16. 16.
    Chau VQ, Oliveros E, Mahmood K, Singhvi A, Lala A, Moss N, Gidwani U, Mancini DM, Pinney SP, Parikh A. The Imperfect Cytokine Storm: Severe COVID-19 with ARDS in Patient on Durable LVAD Support. JACC Case reports 2020.
  17. 17.
    G. T, C. P,M. M,M. B, F. S, A. B, P.A. S, T. R, R.C, R. B, F. B, S. PP, S. PP, G.A. I, F. M, E. A, Tavazzi G, Pellegrini C, Maurelli M, Belliato M, Sciutti F, Bottazzi A, Sepe PA, Resasco T, Camporotondo R, Bruno R, Baldanti F, Paolucci S, Pelenghi S, Iotti GA, Mojoli F, Arbustini E. Myocardial localization of coronavirus in COVID-19 cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631476172.
  18. 18.↵
    F. S, S. X, X.M, Z. X, J. L, M. N, H. C,C. Y, Q. Z, P. S, Z. T, Shao F,Xu S,Ma X, Xu Z, Lyu J, Ng M, Cui H, Yu C, Zhang Q,Sun P, Tang Z, F. S, S. X, X.M, Z. X, J. L, M. N, H. C,C. Y, Q. Z, P. S, Z. T. In-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Resuscitation 2020;151:18–23. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L2005615500.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    Zheng Y-Y, Ma Y-T, Zhang J-Y, Xie X, Y.-Y. Z, Y.-T. M, J.-Y. Z, X. X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020;17:259–260. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L2004397169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    Guo J, Huang Z, Lin L, Lv J, J. G, Z. H, L. L, J. L. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Cardiovascular Disease: A Viewpoint on the Potential Influence of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Onset and Severity of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infec. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e016219–e016219. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631417574.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.
    Akhmerov A, Marban E. COVID-19 and the Heart. Circ Res 2020.
  22. 22.↵
    Aghagoli G, Gallo Marin B, Soliman LB, Sellke FW. Cardiac involvement in COVID-19 patients: Risk factors, predictors, and complications: A review. J Card Surg 2020.
  23. 23.↵
    C. C, Y. Z, D.W. W. SARS-CoV-2: a potential novel etiology of fulminant myocarditis. Herz 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L2004364607.
  24. 24.↵
    Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhao P, Liu H, Zhu L, Tai Y, Bai C, Gao T, Song J, Xia P, Dong J, Zhao J, Wang F-S. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:420–422. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    Deng Q, Hu B, Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhou X, Hu W, Cheng Y, Yan J, Ping H, Zhou Q, Q. D, B. H, Y. Z, H. W, X. Z, W. H, Y. C, J. Y, H. P, Q. Z. Suspected myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19: Evidence from front-line clinical observation in Wuhan, China. Int J Cardiol 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L2005613470.
  26. 26.↵
    Kim I-C, Kim JY, Kim HA, Han S, I.-C. K, J.Y. K, H.A. K, S. H. COVID-19-related myocarditis in a 21-year-old female patient. Eur Heart J 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631502934.
  27. 27.↵
    Ma K-L, Liu Z-H, Cao C, Liu M-K, Liao J, Zou J-B, Kong L-X, Wan K-Q, Zhang J, Wang Q-B, Tian W-G, Qin G-M, Zhang L, Luan F-J, Li S-L, Hu L-B, Li Q-L, Wang H-Q. COVID-19 Myocarditis and Severity Factors : An Adult Cohort Study. medRxiv 2020:2020.03.19.20034124. Available at: http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/23/2020.03.19.20034124.abstract.
  28. 28.↵
    Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet (London, England) 2020;395:497–506.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Huang L, Zhao P, Tang D, Zhu T, Han R, Zhan C, Liu W, Zeng H, Tao Q, Xia L. Cardiac involvement in recovered COVID-19 patients identified by magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X20304034.
  30. 30.↵
    Argulian E, Sud K, Vogel B, Bohra C, Garg VP, Talebi S, Lerakis S, Narula J. Right Ventricular Dilation in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Infection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020:3443. Available at: http://imaging.onlinejacc.org/content/early/2020/05/13/j.jcmg.2020.05.010.abstract.
  31. 31.↵
    Li Y, Li H, Zhu S, Xie Y, Wang B, He L, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Yuan H, Wu C, Sun W, Zhang Y, Li M, Cui L, Cai Y, Wang J, Yang Y, Lv Q, Zhang L, Xie M. Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Longitudinal Strain in Patients with COVID-19. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020.
  32. 32.↵
    Ni W, Yang X, Liu J, Bao J, Li R, Xu Y, Guo W, Hu Y, Gao Z. Acute Myocardial Injury at Hospital Admission is Associated with All-cause Mortality in COVID-19. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020:27334. Available at: http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/early/2020/05/07/j.jacc.2020.05.007.abstract.
  33. 33.↵
    Irabien-Ortiz A. Fulminant myocarditis due to COVID-19 TT - Miocarditis fulminante por COVID-19. Rev Esp Cardiol 2020:10.1016/j.recesp.2020.04.001. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32292228.
  34. 34.↵
    H. H, F. M, X. W, Y. F. Coronavirus fulminant myocarditis saved with glucocorticoid and human immunoglobulin. Eur Heart J 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631266439.
  35. 35.↵
    Guan W, Ni Z, Hu Y, Liang W, Ou C, He J, Liu L, Shan H, Lei C, Hui DSC, Du B, Li L, Zeng G, Yuen K-Y, Chen R, Tang C, Wang T, Chen P, Xiang J, Li S, Wang J, Liang Z, Peng Y, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu Y, Peng P, Wang J, Liu J, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng Z, Qiu S, Luo J, Ye C, Zhu S, Zhong N. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1708–1720. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, Wang B, Xiang H, Cheng Z, Xiong Y, Zhao Y, Li Y, Wang X, Peng Z. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020;323:1061–1069. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Tam C-CF, Cheung K-S, Lam S, Wong A, Yung A, Sze M, Fang J, Tse H-F, Siu C-W. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on outcome of myocardial infarction in Hong Kong, China. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020.
  38. 38.↵
    G. SG, Matteo M, Daniela T, Daniele A, Giuseppe F, Marco A, Marco M, Salvatore C, Diego M, Gaetano P, Michele C, Emilio A, Barbara B, Filippo R, Alfonso I, Maurizio T, Battista DG, Pietro V, Mario B, Lucia B, Jacopo O, Corrado L, Alberto C, Stefano C, Bernhard R, Gianluigi C, Alaide C. ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with COVID-19: Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes. Circulation 2020;0. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047525.
  39. 39.↵
    Welt FGP, Shah PB, Aronow HD, Bortnick AE, Henry TD, Sherwood MW, Young MN, Davidson LJ, Kadavath S, Mahmud E, Kirtane AJ. Catheterization Laboratory Considerations During the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: From ACC’s Interventional Council and SCAI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020.
  40. 40.↵
    Colon CM, Barrios JG, Chiles JW, McElwee SK, Russell DW, Maddox WR, Kay GN. Atrial Arrhythmias in COVID-19 Patients. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020:1183. Available at: http://electrophysiology.onlinejacc.org/content/early/2020/05/17/j.jacep.2020.05.015.abstract.
  41. 41.↵
    Colon CM, Barrios JG, Chiles JW, McElwee SK, Russell DW, Maddox WR, Kay GN. Atrial Arrhythmias in COVID-19 Patients. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020:1183.
  42. 42.↵
    Wu C-I, Postema PG, Arbelo E, Behr ER, Bezzina CR, Napolitano C, Robyns T, Probst V, Schulze-Bahr E, Remme CA, Wilde AAM. SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 and inherited arrhythmia syndromes. Hear Rhythm 2020.
  43. 43.↵
    Sorgente A, Capulzini L, Brugada P. The Known into the Unknown: Brugada syndrome and COVID-19. JACC Case reports 2020.
  44. 44.↵
    Gautret P, Lagier J-C, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, Doudier B, Courjon J, Giordanengo V, Vieira VE, Dupont HT, Honore S, Colson P, Chabriere E, Scola B La, Rolain JM, Brouqui P, Raoult D. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020:105949.
  45. 45.↵
    Chang D, Saleh M, Gabriels J, Ismail H, Goldner B, Willner J, Beldner S, Mitra R, John R, Epstein LM. Inpatient Use of Ambulatory Telemetry Monitors for COVID-19 Patients Treated with Hydroxychloroquine and/or Azithromycin. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020.
  46. 46.↵
    Anon. New FDA Guidance Allows Use of KardiaMobile 6L to Measure QTc in COVID-19 Patients | AliveCor. Available at: https://www.alivecor.com/press/press_release/new-fdaguidance-allows-use-of-kardiamobile-61-to-measure-qtc-in-covid-19-patients/. Accessed May 30, 2020.
  47. 47.↵
    Roden DM, Harrington RA, Poppas A, Russo AM. Considerations for Drug Interactions on QTc Interval in Exploratory COVID-19 Treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:2623 LP – 2624. Available at: http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/75/20/2623.abstract.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    Wissenberg M, Andersen LPK, Pallisgaard JL, Lawson-Smith P. [Fatal outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 in a previously healthy 50-year-old man]. Ugeskr Laeger 2020;182.
  49. 49.↵
    A. H, K. O, D. S, J. B, Hua A, O’Gallagher K, Sado D, Byrne J. Life-threatening cardiac tamponade complicating myo-pericarditis in COVID-19. Eur Heart J 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631411007.
  50. 50.↵
    Dabbagh MF, Aurora L, D’Souza P, Weinmann AJ, Bhargava P, Basir MB. Cardiac Tamponade Secondary to COVID-19. JACC Case reports 2020.
  51. 51.↵
    Chadha S. “COVID-19 Pandemic” Anxiety induced Tako-tsubo Cardiomyopathy. QJM 2020.
  52. 52.↵
    Meyer P, Degrauwe S, Delden C Van, Ghadri J-R, Templin C. Typical takotsubo syndrome triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur Heart J 2020.
  53. 53.↵
    Grillet F, Behr J, Calame P, Aubry S, Delabrousse E. Acute Pulmonary Embolism Associated with COVID-19 Pneumonia Detected by Pulmonary CT Angiography. Radiology 2020:201544.
  54. 54.↵
    Poissy J, Goutay J, Caplan M, Parmentier E, Duburcq T, Lassalle F, Jeanpierre E, Rauch A, Labreuche J, Susen S. Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Patients: Awareness of an Increased Prevalence. Circulation 2020.
  55. 55.↵
    Wichmann D, Sperhake J-P, Lütgehetmann M, Steurer S, Edler C, Heinemann A, Heinrich F, Mushumba H, Kniep I, Schröder AS, Burdelski C, Heer G de, Nierhaus A, Frings D, Pfefferle S, Becker H, Bredereke-Wiedling H, Weerth A de, Paschen H-R, Sheikhzadeh-Eggers S, Stang A, Schmiedel S, Bokemeyer C, Addo MM, Aepfelbacher M, Püschel K, Kluge S. Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19. Ann Intern Med 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2003.
  56. 56.↵
    Lax SF, Skok K, Zechner P, Kessler HH, Kaufmann N, Koelblinger C, Vander K, Bargfrieder U, Trauner M. Pulmonary Arterial Thrombosis in COVID-19 With Fatal Outcome: Results From a Prospective, Single-Center, Clinicopathologic Case Series. Ann Intern Med 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2566.
  57. 57.↵
    Anon. WHO | Pneumonia of unknown cause – China. WHO 2020.
  58. 58.↵
    Argulian E, Sud K, Vogel B, Bohra C, Garg VP, Talebi S, Lerakis S, Narula J. Right Ventricular Dilation in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Infection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020:3443.
  59. 59.↵
    Xu J. Risk assessment of venous thromboembolism and bleeding in COVID-19 patients. Res Sq 2020;preprint:1–16.
  60. 60.
    Panigada M, Bottino N, Tagliabue P, Grasselli G, Novembrino C, Chantarangkul V, Pesenti A, Peyvandi F, Tripodi A. Hypercoagulability of COVID-19 patients in Intensive Care Unit. A Report of Thromboelastography Findings and other Parameters of Hemostasis. J Thromb Haemost 2020.
  61. 61.↵
    Dolhnikoff M, Duarte-Neto AN, Almeida Monteiro RA de, Ferraz da Silva LF, Pierre de Oliveira E, Nascimento Saldiva PH, Mauad T, Marcia Negri E. Pathological evidence of pulmonary thrombotic phenomena in severe COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 2020.
  62. 62.↵
    Magro C, Mulvey JJ, Berlin D, Nuovo G, Salvatore S, Harp J, Baxter-Stoltzfus A, Laurence J. Complement associated microvascular injury and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 infection: a report of five cases. Transl Res 2020.
  63. 63.↵
    Spiezia L, Boscolo A, Poletto F, Cerruti L, Tiberio I, Campello E, Navalesi P, Simioni P. COVID-19-Related Severe Hypercoagulability in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit for Acute Respiratory Failure. Thromb Haemost 2020.
  64. 64.↵
    Leonard-Lorant I, Delabranche X, Severac F, Helms J, Pauzet C, Collange O, Schneider F, Labani A, Bilbault P, Moliere S, Leyendecker P, Roy C, Ohana M. Acute Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Patients on CT Angiography and Relationship to D-Dimer Levels. Radiology 2020:201561.
  65. 65.↵
    S. C, S. C, X. L, S. L, F. W. Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 2020. Available at: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631478312.
  66. 66.↵
    Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:844–847. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14768.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, Guan L, Wei Y, Li H, Wu X, Xu J, Tu S, Zhang Y, Chen H, Cao B. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England) 2020;395:1054–1062.
    OpenUrl
  68. 68.↵
    Zhang L, Yan X, Fan Q, Liu H, Liu X, Liu Z, Zhang Z. D-dimer levels on admission to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19. J Thromb Haemost 2020.
  69. 69.↵
    Li Z, Xiaokai F, Danqing Z, Chunguo J, Heng M, Jing W, Cuihong Z, Hong L, Xiaoling X, Shuangshuang K, Jia L, Huijun J, Xueqin P, Yue S, Ying T, Bin W, Chun W, Hongliang Y, Yongxing Z, Yuman L, Wei S, Yanting Z, Shuangshuang Z, Shuyuan W, Yuji X, Shuping G, Liming Z, Yu H, Mingxing X. Deep Vein Thrombosis in Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcome. Circulation 2020;0. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046702.
  70. 70.↵
    Bin R, Feifei Y, Zhouming D, Sheng Z, Lingfei X, Meng W, Lin C. Extremely High Incidence of Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis in 48 Patients with Severe COVID-19 in Wuhan. Circulation 2020;0. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047407.
  71. 71.↵
    Lippi G, Plebani M, Henry BM. Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: A meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta 2020;506:145–148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. 72.↵
    Barrett CD, Moore HB, Yaffe MB, Moore EE. ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19: A Comment. J Thromb Haemost 2020.
  73. 73.↵
    Klok FA, Kruip MJHA, Meer NJM van der, Arbous MS, Gommers DAMPJ, Kant KM, Kaptein FHJ, Paassen J van, Stals MAM, Huisman M V, Endeman H. Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thromb Res 2020.
  74. 74.↵
    Ranucci M, Ballotta A, Dedda U Di, Bayshnikova E, Dei Poli M, Resta M, Falco M, Albano G, Menicanti L. The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Thromb Haemost 2020.
  75. 75.↵
    Llitjos J-F, Leclerc M, Chochois C, Monsallier J-M, Ramakers M, Auvray M, Merouani K. High incidence of venous thromboembolic events in anticoagulated severe COVID-19 patients.
  76. 76.↵
    Moore HB, Barrett CD, Moore EE, McIntyre RC, Moore PK, Talmor DS, Moore FA, Yaffe MB. Is There a Role for Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) as a Novel Treatment for Refractory COVID-19 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020.
  77. 77.↵
    Wang J, Hajizadeh N, Moore EE, McIntyre RC, Moore PK, Veress LA, Yaffe MB, Moore HB, Barrett CD. Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) Treatment for COVID-19 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): A Case Series. J Thromb Haemost 2020.
  78. 78.↵
    Testa S, Prandoni P, Paoletti O, Morandini R, Tala M, Dellanoce C, Giorgi-Pierfranceschi M, Betti M, Danzi GB, Pan A, Palareti G. Direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels striking increase in severe COVID-19 respiratory syndrome patients treated with antiviral agents. The Cremona experience. J Thromb Haemost 2020.
  79. 79.↵
    Paranjpe I, Fuster V, Lala A, Russak A, Glicksberg BS, Levin MA, Charney AW, Narula J, Fayad ZA, Bagiella E, Zhao S, Nadkarni GN. Association of Treatment Dose Anticoagulation with In-Hospital Survival Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020:27327. Available at: http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/early/2020/05/05/j.jacc.2020.05.001.abstract.
  80. 80.↵
    Casini A, Alberio L, Angelillo-Scherrer A, Fontana P, Gerber B, Graf L, Hegemann I, Korte W, Kremer Hovinga J, Lecompte T, Martinez M, Nagler M, Studt J-D, Tsakiris D, Wuillemin W, Asmis L. Thromboprophylaxis and laboratory monitoring for in-hospital patients with COVID-19 - a Swiss consensus statement by the Working Party Hemostasis. Swiss Med Wkly 2020;150:w20247–w20247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.↵
    Anon. COVID-19 and Pulmonary Embolism - Hematology.org. Available at: https://www.hematology.org/covid-19/covid-19-and-pulmonary-embolism. Accessed May 30, 2020.
  82. 82.↵
    Anon. COVID-19 and VTE-Anticoagulation - Hematology.org. Available at: https://www.hematology.org/covid-19/covid-19-and-vte-anticoagulation. Accessed May 24, 2020.
  83. 83.↵
    Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, Chang J, Hong C, Zhou Y, Wang D, Miao X, Li Y, Hu B. Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127.
  84. 84.↵
    Desforges M, Coupanec A Le, Brison E, Meessen-Pinard M, Talbot PJ. Neuroinvasive and neurotropic human respiratory coronaviruses: potential neurovirulent agents in humans. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014;807:75–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. 85.↵
    Carod-Artal FJ. Neurological complications of coronavirus and COVID-19. Rev Neurol 2020;70:311–322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    Sharifi-Razavi A, Karimi N, Rouhani N. COVID-19 and intracerebral haemorrhage: causative or coincidental? New microbes new Infect 2020;35:100669.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. 87.↵
    Oxley TJ, Mocco J, Majidi S, Kellner CP, Shoirah H, Singh IP, Leacy RA De, Shigematsu T, Ladner TR, Yaeger KA, Skliut M, Weinberger J, Dangayach NS, Bederson JB, Tuhrim S, Fifi JT. Large-Vessel Stroke as a Presenting Feature of Covid-19 in the Young. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. 88.↵
    Saavedra JM. Brain angiotensin II: new developments, unanswered questions and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2005;25:485–512.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Back to top
Posted August 12, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
A Systematic Review of the Cardiovascular Manifestations and Outcomes in the Setting of Coronavirus-19 Disease
Samarthkumar Thakkar, Shilpkumar Arora, Ashish Kumar, Rahul Jaswaney, Mohammed Faisaluddin, Mohammad Ammad Ud Din, Mariam Shariff, Kirolos Barssoum, Harsh P Patel, Arora Nirav, Chinmay Jani, Sejal Savani, Christopher DeSimone, Siva Mulpuru, Abhishek Deshmukh
medRxiv 2020.08.09.20171330; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.09.20171330
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area