Abstract
Importance The re-opening of colleges and universities through the US during the COVID-19 pandemic is a significant public health challenge. The development of accessible and practical approaches for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the college population is paramount for deploying recurrent surveillance testing as an essential strategy for virus detection, containment, and mitigation.
Objectives In this study, we set out to determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic subjects in a university community, using, for the first time, CREST, a CRISPR-Cas13-based test that we developed for accessible and large scale viral surveillance1.
Study Design, Setting, and Participants We enrolled 1,808 asymptomatic persons to undergo SARS-CoV-2 testing. We compared viral prevalence in self-collected oropharyngeal swab samples obtained in two time periods: May 28th-June 11th and June 23rd-July 2nd, 2020. We detected viral genomes in these samples using CREST, and we corroborated our results with a point-of-reference RT-qPCR test. Positive samples were confirmed by a clinical laboratory and reported to the local Public Health Department.
Results All the 732 tests performed between late May to early June were negative. In contrast, tests performed on 1,076 samples collected between late June to early July revealed eight positive cases by CREST, confirmed by RT-qPCR and CLIA-diagnostic testing. The average age of the positive cases was 21.7 years; all individuals self-identified as students. These metrics showed that CREST was effective at capturing positive SARS-CoV-2 cases in our student population. Notably, the viral loads detected in these asymptomatic cases resemble those seen in clinical samples, highlighting the potential of covert viral transmission.
Conclusions and Relevance Our study revealed a substantial shift in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in a young and asymptomatic population, and uncovered the leading wave of a local outbreak that coincided with rising case counts in the surrounding county and the state of California. Moreover, and most notably, the almost perfect concordance between CRISPR- and PCR-based testing indicated that CREST using self-collected OP swabs is reliable and it allows expanding options for large-scale surveillance testing and detection of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, as is required to resume operations in higher education institutions in the US and abroad.
Question Are CRISPR-based methods a reliable and accessible option to capture SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in a college population?
Findings We tested 1,808 asymptomatic individuals from a university population for SARS-CoV-2, using, for the first time, a CRISPR-based assay for virus surveillance. We detected eight positive cases, corroborated by RT-qPCR and confirmed by a clinical laboratory. Our CRISPR-based method captured a change in viral prevalence coinciding with the relaxation of lockdown measures and the rise of COVID-19 cases in the community.
Significance We demonstrate that CRISPR-based methods offer scalable and reliable SARS-CoV-2 testing for virus surveillance and allow capturing the leading edge of an outbreak.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was funded by the UCSB Office of Research
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Cottage Health IRB, Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Protocol 20-38ux
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data referred to in the manuscript, will be made available upon request
