Abstract
Background Loneliness and physical activity are important targets for research into the impact of COVID-19 because they have established links with mental health, could be exacerbated by social distancing policies and are potentially modifiable.
Methods We analysed mental health data collected during COVID-19 from adults aged 50 and over alongside comparable annual data collected between 2015 and 2019 from the same sample. Trajectories of depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) were analysed with respect to loneliness, physical activity levels and a number of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics using zero-inflated negative binomial regression.
Findings 3,281 people completed the COVID-19 mental health questionnaire, all had at least one data point prior to 2020. In 2020, the adjusted PHQ-9 score for loneliness was 3·2. (95% CI: 3·0-3·4), an increase of one point on previous years and 2 points higher than people not rated lonely, whose score did not change in 2020 (1·2, 95% CI: 1·1-1·3). PHQ-9 was 2·6 (95% CI: 2·4-2·8) in people with decreased physical activity, an increase of 0.5 on previous years. In contrast, PHQ-9 in 2020 for people whose physical activity had not decreased was 1·7 (95% CI: 1·6-1·8), similar to previous years. A similar relationship was observed for GAD-7 though the differences were smaller and the absolute burden of symptoms lower.
Interpretation After accounting for pre-COVID-19 trends, we show that experiencing loneliness and decreased physical activity are risk factors for worsening mental health during the pandemic. Our findings highlight the need to examine policies which target these potentially modifiable risk factors.
Funding This paper represents independent research part funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. This research was also supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula. Additional funding for the COVID-19 mental health questionnaire was provided by King’s College London and Stavanger University Hospital.
Evidence before this study PubMed and Google Scholar were searched using the terms “COVID*” OR “coronavirus*” AND “depress*” OR “anxi*” OR “mental health” OR “lonel*” OR “physical activity” OR “exercise”. The major focus of existing longitudinal studies of mental health was demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. No studies were found which focused on loneliness or physical activity in the context of the pandemic which also had longitudinal data prior to the pandemic.
Added value of this study To our knowledge we present the first longitudinal analysis of the impact of loneliness and decreased physical activity on mental health during the pandemic with specific estimates generated which account for existing trends prior to 2020. We found that the pandemic exacerbated existing relationships between loneliness, physical activity and mental health, we also replicate previous research showing that women and retired people’s mental health has worsened to a greater extent than men and those not in retirement respectively.
Implications of all the available evidence Both loneliness and physical activity are potentially modifiable risk factors. Loneliness was already a major concern before the pandemic and this evidence provides a clear rationale to undertake further research into its feasibility as a target to mitigate deterioration in mental health during the pandemic. There are a number of initiatives, including resilience building and befriending, which could be potential candidates. Similarly exercise has been pushed to the forefront of policy due to the links between obesity and risk of severe physical illness from coronavirus. Our research underscores the potential added benefits on mental health of maintaining physical activity specifically during the pandemic.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This paper represents independent research part funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London. This research was also supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula. Additional funding for the COVID-19 mental health questionnaire was provided by Kings College London and Stavanger University Hospital.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The PROTECT study received ethical approval from the UK London Bridge National Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 13/LO/1578) and the COVID-19 mental health questionnaire was approved by the same committee (as an amendment) on 6th April 2020.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the PROTECT study.
