Summary
PTEN plays a central role in the pathogenesis of endometrial carcinoma. Previous studies reported a high interobserver reproducibility for the interpretation of PTEN immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, PTEN IHC and its interpretation remain challenging during laboratory practice. The purpose of this study was to reevaluate PTEN IHC pattern in direct comparison to next generation sequencing (NGS) in identifying PTEN abnormality. IHC and tagged-amplicon NGS PTEN sequencing was performed on 182 endometrial carcinoma biopsy/curetting samples from five centers (Barts, Calgary, Cambridge, Leiden, and Vancouver). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PTEN IHC to predict loss of function (LOF) PTEN mutations were calculated. Abnormalities of PTEN in association with histotype and molecular subtype were assessed. A total of five PTEN IHC patterns were recorded: absent, subclonal loss, equivocal, reduced (relative to internal control) and retained. The absence of PTEN IHC has a sensitivity of 75.4% (95% CI 62.7 – 85.5%), a specificity of 84.6% (95% CI 76.2 – 90.9%), and accuracy of 81.2% (95% CI 74.4 – 86.9%) in predicting LOF PTEN mutation. PTEN abnormality by complementary interpretation of both assays was present in 91.9% of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, grade 1, and significantly higher in endometrial endometrioid carcinomas of all grades compared to endometrial serous carcinoma (80.0% versus 19.4%, p<0.0001). PTEN abnormalities are common across all molecular subtypes of endometrioid carcinomas. Our data support complementary testing of both IHC and sequencing of PTEN to assess the PTEN status in endometrial carcinomas.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
MK received internal support from Calgary Laboratory Services (RS19-612). This project was funded by a research grant from Barts and the London Charity, MRD0206, supported by the Gynaecological Cancer Research Fund at Barts and the London NHS Trust.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta Cancer Committee (HREBA-CC-16-0156)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
on request
