Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (ai-LAMP) for Rapid and Reliable Detection of SARS-CoV-2

1.1. Ethics statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the University Human ethics guidelines and received a favourable review from the Faculty of Health and Medicine Research Ethics Committee (FHMREC) of Lancaster University - reference number FHMREC19112. The study was exempt from requiring specific patient consent, as it only involved the use of extracted RNA and existing collections of data or records that contained non-identifiable data about human patients.

1.2. Cells and viruses

Vero cells and MDCK cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco), 2 mM l-glutamine (Gibco) and 100U/mL penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Influenza A virus (A/chicken/Pakistan/UDL-01/2008(H9N2), Newcastle disease virus strain LaSota and Infectious bronchitis virus strain H120, Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and Sendai virus (SeV) were propagated and used to determine the specificity of the LAMP. All viruses except influenza were titrated on Vero and MDCK cells, respectively by the standard plaque assay.

1.3. In silico nucleotide sequence comparisons and primer design

To design specific LAMP primer sets for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, all available complete genome sequences were downloaded from GISAID Initiative (https://www.gisaid.org/), aligned and the conserved part was selected and used as the template of LAMP primer design. To find out an efficient primer set, three sets of specific LAMP primers were hand-picked and validated using PrimerExplorer V5 software (http://primerexplorer.jp/elamp4.0.0/index.html). Primers were validated using BLAST software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/BLAST) to ensure their specificity.

1.4. Cloning and in vitro transcription of RdRP target gene

The coding sequence of SARS-CoV-2 RdRp gene was chemically synthesized and cloned into pVAX1 plasmid (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) between KpnI and NotI restriction sites. The plasmid was propagated in DH5α cells and purified using MiniPrep Qiagen Kits. The linearized plasmid with pVAX1-RdRP was used for in vitro transcription using T7 RiboMAX™ Express Large-Scale RNA Production System (Promega, USA). The copy number of in vitro transcribed RNA was calculated from RNA concentration measured with NanoDrop™ 2000c Spectrophotometers (Thermo, USA) in triplicate. RNA products were then purified using the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). A standard curve was generated using dilutions of the standard in vitro transcribed RNAs using SuperScript III Platinum One-Step qRT-PCR Kit as per the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) using CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System is (Applied Biosystems, USA).

1.5. Clinical sample processing and spiking with miR-cel-miR-39-3p RNA

A total of 199 nasopharyngeal swabs were individually collected from CoVID-19 suspected patients, through routine NHS collection procedure. These samples were stored and transported in the virus transport media (VTM) to the diagnostic laboratory at Lancaster University, UK. All samples were individually spiked with 50 pmol/L of synthesized Caenorhabditis elegans miR-cel-miR-39-3p (Applied Biosystems/Ther-mo-Fisher Scientific, UK). The miR-cel-miR-39-3p RNA lacked any sequence homology to human or viral gene and thus present an ideal RNA extraction control. Total RNA including miRNAs was extracted using 140 μL of the spiked-VTM by the commercial QIAampViral RNA Mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California). The miR-cel-miR-39-3p RNA was used to serve as an internal control to monitor extraction efficiency and used for data normalisation. The final RNA yield and purity were determined by the A260/A280 ratio measured by a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies/Thermo-Fisher Scientific, UK) with a ratio of 1.80 to 2.00 indicative of good RNA purity. The isolated RNA was stored at −80 °C for further use.

1.6. Real-time fluorescent-based quantitative PCR

Suspected samples with SARS-CoV-2 were tested for positivity by qRT-PCR. Briefly, RNA was extracted from Viral Transport Media using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California) following the manufacturer instructions. The qRT-PCR was conducted using the SuperScript III Platinum One-Step qRT-PCR Kit as per the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen Carlsbad, USA) in the CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Biorad, USA), according to the cycling protocol. The reaction was performed using the specific primer set RdRpF; RdRpR and FAM-labelled probe or NP-F; NP-R and ROX labelled probes designed to detect SARS-CoV2. The 25-µl PCR reaction consists of 12.5 µl 2X Reaction Mix, 0.2 µM of each primer, and 0.1 µM probe, 0.5 µl of SuperScript® III RT/Platinum® Taq Mix, 5 µl of RNA sample and nuclear free water. The cycling program was performed in the CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System is (Applied Biosystems, USA), according to the cycling protocol. The amount of viral RNA in each sample was estimated by comparing the cycle threshold values (Ct) to the standard curve made by serial 10-fold serial dilutions of previously titrated in vitro transcribed RdRP gene.

1.7. ai-LAMP assay performance

All experiments for LAMP were run in triplicate. The LAMP reactions were performed using WarmStart™ Colorimetric LAMP 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs). A 10X primer mix (FIP, 16 µM; BIP, 16 µM; F3, 2 µM; B3, 2 µM; LF, 4 µM; LB, 4 µM) was prepared. A 25 µl reaction mixture (12.5 µl 2X MasterMix; 2.5 µl 10X primer mix; 2.5 µl RNA and 7.5 µl DNase & RNase-free molecular grade water) was mixed homogeneously and centrifuged. The LAMP was performed in a thermocycler (MJResearch) at 65°C for 30 min or in the engineered device (Figure 4A). Colour change was observed directly by the naked eye or through image processing, and agarose gel electrophoresis was performed to confirm the results. The completion of amplification was indicated by the colour in the tube, wherein yellow was considered positive and pink was regarded as negative. The amplicon was confirmed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.

1.8. Artificial intelligence based test-tube colour detection

A loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay based COVID-19 test device was proposed to obtain the COVID-19 test results in 30 minutes based on colour changes. Artificial intelligence (AI) based colour detection was proposed to identify colour changes considering different lighting issues and to reduce the test running time less than 30 minutes. Images were acquired from the COVID-19 test kit which carried 8 test-tubes including NTC (negative test control) and PTC (positive test control) for every 20 seconds during the test operation. Each image was cropped into separate tubes using template matching approach and labelled manually based on their colour.

1.9. Analytical specificity and analytical sensitivity of LAMP

The designed RdRp primer sets for LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 were validated for their specificity by testing the cross-reactivity with other viruses, including influenza A virus, Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), Sendai virus (SeD), infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV). Likewise, the developed LAMP assay was evaluated to test the primers set sensitivity in a serially diluted standard RNA template prepared by tenfold serial dilutions. The amplification patterns were observed for each dilution to determine the lowest amount of absolute RNA template required for detectable amplification. The degree of colour intensity of the amplified product as well as the observed electrophoretic pattern during gel electrophoresis was used for the analysis of LAMP amplification.

1.10. Quantitative real time PCR for miR-cel-miR-39-3p RNA

In order to determine the RNA extraction efficiency, the extracted RNA was reverse transcribed using a commercially available kit (Applied Biosystems/Thermo-Fisher Scientific, UK) using miR-specific stem-loop primers as per manufacturer instructions. A total of 5 μL of the sample was added to a 96-well plate together with 10 μL reaction mixture (MasterMixTM) containing along with MultiscribeTM reverse transcriptase (50 U/μL), and 0.19 μL RNAase inhibitor (20 U/μL). The RT reaction was performed at 16 °C for 30 min, followed by 42 °C for 30 min, and 85 °C for 5 min and was finally kept at 4 °C. A NTC was considered in every individually run reaction to identify any unspecific amplification. The RT products were quantified immediately by qPCR using TaqManTM MicroRNA assays (Applied Biosystems/Thermo-Fisher Scientific, UK) in a 96 well plate using the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, UK) as we described before [37]. The quantification cycle (Cq) was determined with instrument default threshold settings (10 SDs above the mean fluorescence of the baseline cycle).

1.11. Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism Software version 6.01 for Mac (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA) was used for graphs generation. The LAMP detection sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the chi-squared test. TPR (true positive rate), TNR (true negative rate), FPR (false positive rate), FNR (false negative rate) were calculated according to the following equations: TPR= TP/(TP+FN). TNR=TN/(FP+TN). FNR=FN/(TP+FN). FPR=FP/(FP+TN). TP: total number of true positives. TN: total number of true negatives. TN: total number of true negatives. FN: total number of false negatives.

2.1. High resolution conversation analysis of SARS-CoV-2 to guide promising oligos design

It is imperative to critically assess the evolving nature of viruses in identifying conserved gene signatures and guiding the selection of the most appropriate primers. In order to identify important genomic loci, we downloaded and aligned all the available full-length genomes with high coverage sequences (n=22858) of SARS-CoV-2 by Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT) [20]. We then compiled in house R-code (available on request) to determine the single nucleotide-based genetic conservation across the length of ∼30kb genome. The analysis of the aligned dataset of all genomes in the RStudio generated a total of 18GB high-resolution nucleotide-by-nucleotide score from 0.0 to 1.0 (1.0 being the highly conserved and 0.0 being the highly divergent). Plotting the assessed genetic divergence, at a cut point of 90% similarity along with the genome of the SARS-CoV-2, identified sharp divergence at multiple loci (Figure 1A). However, most of the genomes maintained high conservation. The divergence at the 5’ and 3’ ends was primarily due to length heterogeneity, which may be partly as a result of sequencing artifact or potentially coronaviruses ragged termini (Figure 1B). Owing to high divergence, a stretch of sequence (∼400 nucleotides, numbering corresponds to the complete genome of strain SARS-CoV-2/human/USA/VA-DCLS-0285/2020 strain, GenBank Accession Number: MT558705.1) spanning the start of the ORF1b, which encode for viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), was targeted to design oligos for the LAMP assay. Additionally, this specific target genomic locus was adjacent to oligos recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Public Health England (PHE) for real-time RT-PCR-based routine identification of CoVID-19 patients, further allowing direct and comparable evaluation of real-time RT-PCR with de novo developed LAMP assay (Figure 1C).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: In silico analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and primer design.

(A) Genome organization of SARS-CoV-2. Scale represents an approximate position of the genome whereas ORF1a and b are expanded to show internal gene organization. (B) Level of gene identity across the genome of the SARS-CoV-2. Identity less than 90% is not shown. (C) Primer location in the RdRP gene of SARS-COV-2 is shown. Red coloured sequences represent LAMP primers whereas blue coloured sequences are primers and probes used in the qRT-PCR. (D) Comparative sequence identity using the primers against different human coronaviruses compared to the reference SARS-CoV-2 sequence; dots represent identical nucleotides.

The conserved region of the RdRP gene with the lowest mutation frequencies was used as a template to manually design three sets of basic LAMP primers and selected with PrimerExplorer V5 for appropriate primer lengths, loop selection and melting temperature optimization (Figure 1C). In order to preclude the non-specific amplification of common coronaviruses, efforts were made to design primers in the regions where there is a high level of divergence among more than 3 of the 6 total primers in a specific set. Amongst the most suitable targets, the primers with high scores were aligned with MERS-CoV, hCoV-229E, hCoV-OC43, hCoV-NL63, hCoV-HKU1 and SARS-CoV-1 (Figure 1D). These selected primers were used for further validation and screening.

2.2. Determination of limit of detection using biochemically synthesis RNA

In order to assess the robustness of the primers, we used a fully identical in vitro transcribed target RNA unanimously spanning the length of the RdRP-gene based LAMP and qRT-PCR target regions. The pre-determined copy numbers of the biochemically synthesised RNA were 10-fold serially diluted from 10⁷ copies to 0 copies of the target gene per reaction. To determine the analytical sensitivity of the assays, we first evaluated their limits of detection (LoD) for both qRT-PCR and LAMP assays. The LoD of the qRT-PCR was 10 copies as evident from the relative fluorescence units (Figure 2A) and electrophoreses of the amplified products (Figure 2B). The standard curve generated by the RdRP-based qRT-PCR was linear and generated a coefficient of correlation (R²) = 0.9481 and a slope of -2.6509 (Figure 2C). Melting curve analysis revealed the specificity of primers for the target gene sequence, as all the amplified products showed a uniform melting temperature (Tm) of ∼75.10°C and specific amplification patterns (Figure 2B and data not shown). Compared to the qRT-PCR assay, the LoD for the LAMP which targeted the same RdRP gene was 1 log unit higher (10² copies/reaction) (Figure 2D, upper panel) as assessed by visual observation of the LAMP reaction, where positive reactions turned yellow and negative reactions remained pink when observed by the naked eye. To further confirm the specific amplification of the target region, the gradient LAMP products were visualized by DNA staining and gel electrophoresis for the amplified product, further confirming the detection limit of LAMP (Figure 2D, lower panel).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2: Sensitivities of the LAMP assay.

(A) Seven different dilutions of in vitro transcribed RNA were run for quantitively measurement in the qRT-PCR. Relative fluorescence units show a gradient decrease in signals. (B) The corresponding PCR products on the electrophoresis gel (C) The qRT-PCR standard curve based on the Ct value and dilution factor. (D) The serially diluted synthetic RNAs were run for LAMP assay and colour change represents positive (yellow) or negative (pink). The lower panel show LAMP gradient products.

2.3. Specificity of the novel LAMP with other respiratory and medically important viruses

The SARS-CoV-2 embraces genetic and phenotypic features of several common cold coronaviruses and other viruses of the respiratory tract. Owing to high genetic similarity (up to 96% at nucleotide levels) and common respiratory specimen for clinical identification of CoVID-19 patients, we aimed to investigate any non-specific amplification in the LAMP assay. In order to demonstrate the specificity of the LAMP assay, we used pathogens belonging to 5 families of the most important medical and respiratory viruses. As shown in the Figure 3A, the qRT-PCR specifically detected only the SARS-CoV-2 and this specificity was noticed on Gel-red staining of amplified products (Figure 3B). Consistently, no cross-reactivities were noticed with the LAMP in both colorimetric detection (Figure 3C, upper panel) or electrophoreses (Figure 3C, lower panel). Collectively, a high level of specificity was observed in primers set using either of the assays.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3: Specificity of the LAMP assay.

(A) RNA extracted from different medically or respiratory important viruses as well as two dilutions of synthetic RNA were run for qPCR. (B) Corresponding PCR products were run on gel to demonstrate specificity. (C) Similar to qRT-PCR, extracted RNA were run for the LAMP assay. The top panel indicates the colorimetric detection of LAMP positive/negative reactions and the lower panel show the electrophoresis of the corresponding LAMP products.

2.4. Temporal investigations of the LAMP and its impact on the limit of detection

One of the major advantages of LAMP is its robustness. In order to determine the time optimal for sufficient amplification of targeted genes, in vitro transcribed RNA was used as a template for 30 minutes and assessed after every 5 minutes post-start of the reaction. The change in colour was monitored visually by the naked eye. As shown in Table 1, under equivalent conditions similar results were obtained from 20-30 minutes of amplification. Therefore, 30 min was selected as the optimal visual interpretation time for the results.

While the change in colour, reflective of a positive reaction, could be detected as early as 20 minutes post-start of the reaction at lower copy number, subjective variabilities may result in erroneous interpretation, especially in colorimetric based diagnostic assays. To propose an automated imaging, processing and interpretation of the LAMP based results, we developed a user-friendly device and furnished it with an artificial intelligence based automatic interpretation algorithm.

2.5. Manufacture of an isothermal nucleic acid amplification device with colorimetric detection features

A device (Figure 4A) was built with many off-the-shelf electronic components and custom flexible resistive heating elements (5W, NEL, UK), and specially designed aluminium heating blocks. Raspberry Pi (RPi) was used to control the device. The one wire interface of the RPi was used to connect ten digital temperature sensors (DS18B20, Maxim Integrated, USA) positioned directly on the PCB boards to monitor heater block temperature changes and provide feedback control. The specially designed aluminium heater blocks to hold 200 µl PCR tubes and the lid heater to prevent condensation were attached directly on top of the surface mount temperature sensors on the respective PCBs with a heat transferring adhesive (TermoGlue, Termopasty Grzegorz Gasowski, Poland). The flexible resistive heating elements were also attached to the heater blocks. To circumvent the need for specialised docks and eliminate user interpretation of the colorimetric results, a Raspberry Pi Camera (RPi Camera) was used. Eight LEDs (LW T733, Osram, Germany) were assembled on the top side of the lid mount PCB to shine light directly into the reaction tubes to achieve consistent lighting within the device. All the above components were assembled into a 3D printed enclosure (14.3 x 10.8 x 6 cm) specially designed with openings to access to the USB and TCP/IP ports of the RPi. A 20,000 mAh power bank (Anker Power Core, Anker, China) with two 5V, 2A output was used to power the device. A Python based control software was used to control the heating, image the progression of the LAMP assay and store the ‘time-lapse’ images and temperature data within a specified folder. The user can initiate a test by either connecting to a screen via the HDMI port or through simply pairing the device with the mobile app via Bluetooth and selecting the required diagnostic assay.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4: Fabrication and processing of LAMP data for enhanced detection of SARS-CoV-2.

(A) Exterior of a smart diagnostic device (B) Description of the AI-assisted algorithm and image processing. (C) Pipeline to process images and extraction of colorimetric information. (D) Schematic outlining the training of the network for image processing.

2.6. Automated image acquisition and processing through template matching-based algorithm

The LAMP assay in 8 separate tubes was remotely started to initiate heating to 65°C. Images of those test tubes were captured using the inbuilt RPi Camera for every 20 seconds and were saved in the RPi in the RGB format. Each individual image consisted of 8 frames around each tube with a black background. As the tube area exposing colour changes was fractionally small compared to its background, we first extracted each targeted tube frame from the image before applying an image processing algorithm. In order to process these extracted frames, a reference tube was selected as a template, and a template matching algorithm [21] was applied to extract all tubes from the first image. The rationale for the template matching was to search and find the location of a template image in a larger image. It simply slides the template image over the input image to perform the 2-dimensional convolution and compared values to get the maximum overlap to decide the exact similar areas. Assuming that positions of the test-tube do not change over the time of an experiment, images were cropped in an experiment to obtain the tube frames from the entire image. These crops are then saved into a 2-dimensional array for RGB colour space (see equation below). Once extracted, RGB format images were converted to YUV format using the following transformation [22] to avoid diffraction and lighting variabilities in different images.

In YUV colour space, the Y channel represented the luminance of the colour, while the U and V channels represented the chrominance (Figure 4B). Separating the luminance from the chrominance reduced the effect of light changing and shadow noises in each tested tube [23]. Finally, the chrominance (U, V) channels from the YUV image were considered for image processing. The chrominance (U, V) values of those extracted test tubes were compared with reference orange test tubes in positive control and reference pink image in negative control test tubes to calculate the sum of absolute difference (SAD) for each of the pixel values. After experiments with two images set and fine tuning the threshold values manually, a SAD threshold value was achieved which provides 100% accuracy in the separation of classes.

Despite the SAD based approach resulting in 100% accuracy for the images after 30 minutes, this approach failed with other datasets containing bubbles and different background lights as a different threshold value was produced for each image set. Therefore, a deep learning-based approach was utilised in our experiments to generalize the classification for different background light and sound sources.

2.7. Artificial intelligence-assisted rapid detection of colour changes associated with the LAMP reaction

Multiple rule-based computer vision techniques were applied to identify small changes in light intensity and to fix the position. Deep learning is a subdomain of AI which doesn’t require any domain knowledge to work, however, it learns hidden patterns from examples present in the dataset. A deep learning Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) [24] architecture was proposed with the bespoke 8 layers deep mode as shown in Figure 4C. It consisted of four convolutional layers followed by 2 dense and an output layer. To compile the model, binary cross-entropy was used as a loss of function and used to optimize.

For the training of the network, the dataset was shuffled and then split into 9:1 proportion (Figure 4D). 90% of the data was used to train the network and the remaining 10% was exploited to check how the network behaved on seeing a new image. Training a dataset requires loading numerous images into the memory in a single operation which is an expensive process. Therefore, a data generator was implemented that read the data in batches from the dataset directory and fed it to the model. After multiple experiments, it was observed that the network converged after 6 cycles (epochs) through the dataset. Therefore, we ran an experiment for only 6 epochs to decrease the probability of overfitting. In addition, an additional set of 108 test-tube crops was used to validate the network. The best performing network resulted in an accuracy of 98% in classifying tubes based on their colours (images with better light).

In order to assess the temporal impact of the AI-assisted detection of colour changes (indicative of amplification), the RT-LAMP reaction was run with 3 previously confirmed positive and negative patient samples as well as positive and negative controls. Colour changes were assessed every 5 minutes until the complete stoppage of the LAMP reaction at 30 minutes. Gradual colour changes were detectable with the naked eye as early as 20 minutes post-start of the reaction (Figure 5A). Corresponding samples were run on the newly developed device and temporal and real-time colour changes were monitored as described earlier. Depending upon the viral load in the sample, a clear colour change was calibrated as early as 20 minutes using device operated processing of the data (Figure 5B). Once the positive test control is identified as positive, the test will be stopped, and results will be returned to reduce the waiting time and power consumption on heating.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 5: Conventional and AI-assisted interpretation of LAMP results.

(A) Temporal analysis of known positive and negative patient samples for visual interpretation of LAMP results. (B) Interpretation of corresponding patient samples by the AI-assisted LAMP results.

As shown in Fig 5B, template matching algorithm is applied to extract test tubes and CNN model is applied and trained. The CNN model is used as machine learning algorithm to identify colours for each image taken throughout the experiment. Images taken at time tare marked as ‘t’ in the Fig 5B. Once positive control test and negative control test give the correct results consecutively for three times, LAMP based test will be stopped, and results will be returned. This approach will reduce the waiting time for the results and power consumption due to heating in the experiment.

2.8. Validation of ai-LAMP and comparative performance in clinical settings

In order to assess the field application of the optimized assay, we applied the ai-LAMP to purified RNA spiked with miR-cel-miR-39-3p from CoVID-19 patients. A total of 199 swab samples were collected from CoVID-19 clinically suspected patients during routine screening at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary (RLI), University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust UK. The extracted RNA from swab samples were run in parallel for ai-LAMP and two WHO/PHE recommended qRT-PCR targeting the RdRP and N genes of the SARS-CoV-2. This parallel assessment allowed us to assess the comparative performance of the ai-LAMP.

The RdRP gene-based qRT-PCR detected a total of 67 positives and 132 negatives in a cohort of 199 patients (Figure 6A). In contrast, a higher number of positive (n=88) and lower numbers of negative (n=111) were detected by the qPCR which targeted the N gene (Figure 6B). Interestingly, the ai-LAMP detected a total of 126 positive samples which constituted several times higher than RdRP and N gene-based qPCR, respectively. Comparative analysis of these three molecular detection assays revealed 58 total true positives (TP), 09 false negatives (FN), 64 true negatives (TN), and 68 false positives (FP) in RdRP-based qRT-PCR compared to RdRP-based LAMP (Figure 6A). Similarly, upon comparative analysis of the N gene-based qPCR and RdRP-based LAMP, we observed a total of 74 TP, 14 FN, 59 TN, and 52 FP (Figure 6B).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 6: Clinical validation of ai-LAMP.

(A-C) Comparative sample positivity between LAMP and RdRP qRT-PCR (A), LAMP and N qRT-PCR (B), LAMP and CUM qRT-PCR results (C). (D) The heatmap indicate the relative positive and negative samples among three assays. (D) Linearity chart comparing the LAMP positive/negative samples and their detection based on the RdRP gene-based qRT-PCR. (F) Linearity chart comparing the LAMP positive/negative samples and their detection based on the N gene-based qRT-PCR. (G) Naked eye detection of first 96 samples out of the total 199 patients’ samples processed. (H) Recovery Ct values of the miRNA from spiked before RNA extraction.

In the current clinical settings, a qRT_PCR targeting two genes (N and RdRP) was conducted to conclusively identify CoVID-19 positive cases and this assay is referred as cumulative (CUM) qRT-PCR. In this scenario, a sample would be considered as positive only if a Ct value of =/> 35 was detected in both N and RdRP-gene based qRT-PCR. Using this approach, we noticed a total of a 70 positive and 129 negative samples and an improved true positive (n=61), false negatives (n=09), true negatives (n=64), and false positives (n=65) limits (Figure 6C). Taken together, the cumulative comparative picture of the qPCR and ai-LAMP has identified a superior detection of positive cases (Figure 6D). In order to confirm this detection performance, all ai-LAMP amplification products were visualised by electrophoresis (data not shown), further confirming the aided-detection and improved implication of ai-LAMP in the field condition.

We next determined the detection limit of the ai-LAMP in direct correlation with the standard Ct values of the qPCRs. Plotting of ai-LAMP positive and negative data against the linearity of the Ct values revealed that ai-LAMP carried Cp (cycle number at detection threshold) of up to 37 Ct determined in the qPCR based on the RdRP gene (Figure 6E and Supplementary Table 1) or N gene (Figure 6F and Supplementary Table 1) of the SARS-CoV-2. This detection is approximately 2 Ct values higher than the detection limit of the standard qPCR. Analysis of the first 96 samples, run in parallel for the ai-LAMP, (Figure 6G and Supplementary Table 1) showed a clear demarcation of the positive and negative samples in the RdRP-gene based ai-LAMP. In order to rule out the quantitative recovery from spiked miRNA, a qRT-PCR was run for 40 randomly selected samples [37]. Based on the Ct values, all samples showed a marked recovery except a single sample where a low detection of the miRNA was identified (Figure 6H, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1).

Collectively, these data highlight the improved specificity and sensitivity of the AI-assisted LAMP assay compared to the naked-eye interpretation of the LAMP-positivity, thus enhancing the timely and automated detection and interpretation of the assay results.