Abstract
U.S. veterans are 1.5 times more likely to die by suicide than Americans who never served in the military. Considering such high rates, there is an urgent need to develop innovative approaches for objective and clinically applicable assessments to detect individuals at high risk. We hypothesize that speech in suicidal veterans has a range of distinctive acoustic and linguistic features. The purpose of this work is to build an automated machine learning and natural language processing tool to screen for suicidality. Veterans made 588 narrative audio recordings via a mobile app in a real-life setting. In addition, veterans completed self-report psychiatric scales and questionnaires. Recordings were analyzed to extract voice characteristics including prosodic, phonation, and glottal. The audios were also transcribed to extract textual features for linguistic analysis. We evaluated the acoustic and linguistic features using both statistical significance and ensemble feature selection. We also examined the performance of different machine learning algorithms on multiple combinations of features to classify suicidal and non-suicidal audios. Random Forest classifier correctly identified suicidal ideation in veterans based on the combined set of acoustic and linguistic features of speech with 86% sensitivity, 70% specificity, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 80%. Speech analysis of audios collected from veterans in everyday life settings using smartphones is a promising approach for suicidal ideation detection. A machine learning classifier may eventually help clinicians identify and monitor high-risk veterans.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project has been funded partly by Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUCCTS) (UL1-TR001409) and partly with Federal funds (5 I01CX000801 02) from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The content of this work does not necessarily reflect the policies or position of the US Government.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
DC VAMC IRB and the DC VAMC R&D Committee approved this research study.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Public sharing of the data is not possible.