Abstract
The world is experiencing one of the greatest public health emergencies in history with the global spread of COVID-19. Health systems, including Primary Health Care (PHC) services, are pillars of pandemic coping strategies, and there are important gaps in the literature on the best ways to organize PHC in health crisis scenarios such as the one currently experienced. Given the urgency of responses, we performed a rapid systematic literature review on MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE and LILACS (via VHL), in order to analyze empirical studies on the effectiveness of PHC organization strategies in the context of epidemics to improve access and reduce morbidity and mortality. We selected seven articles, which studied the responses to different epidemics in different parts of the world. In terms of access, the studies suggest positive results with the adoption of adjustments of work processes of the teams and the structure of the services, combined with diversification of actions (including call center), adequate provision of inputs and personal protective equipment, adequate action plans and communication strategies, and effective integration with public health services and other levels of care. No study analyzed population morbidity and mortality. The included studies suggest also that community-oriented PHC is more effective in crisis scenarios, indicating the necessity of strengthening of the Family Health Strategy in the Brazilian context.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This review received no funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This rapid systematic review needed no ethical approval from a research ethics committee.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
URL (Lattes): http://lattes.cnpq.br/7489127535403969
Competing interests: None.
URL (Lattes): http://lattes.cnpq.br/5114282145335545
URL (Lattes): http://lattes.cnpq.br/9234772336296638
URL (Lattes): http://lattes.cnpq.br/2570855705420190
Competing interests: None.
Competing interests: None.
Competing interests: None.
Funding agency: not applicable.
E-mail: tdsarti{at}gmail.com.
E-mail: welingtonsl{at}hotmail.com.
E-mail: leonardof{at}leonardof.med.br.
E-mail: apscoelho{at}gmail.com.
Data Availability
This is a rapid systematic review. All relevant data are described in the article.