Abstract
The ongoing pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 calls for rapid and cost-effective methods to accurately identify infected individuals. The vast majority of patient samples is assessed for viral RNA presence by RT-qPCR. Our biomedical research institute, in collaboration between partner hospitals and an accredited clinical diagnostic laboratory, established a diagnostic testing pipeline that has reported on more than 40,000 RT-qPCR results since its commencement at the beginning of April 2020. However, due to ongoing demand and competition for critical resources, alternative testing strategies were sought. In this work, we present a clinically-validated standard operating procedure (SOP) for high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-LAMP in 25 minutes that is robust, reliable, repeatable, sensitive, specific, and inexpensive.
Introduction
The current pandemic caused by novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, first detected in late 2019 in the province of Wuhan, China, has rapidly spread worldwide, infecting more than 10 million individuals as of 29 June 20201–3. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 can lead to development of COVID-19, a disease associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome, responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths globally. Controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 relies on the ability of healthcare systems to quickly identify infected individuals, which has mainly relied on RT-qPCR for viral RNA detection4. International competition for commercial kits and reagents has negatively impacted the ability of many countries to scale up testing capacity to deal with the increased demand caused by rampant infection. Implementing RT-qPCR testing programs requires specialised laboratory equipment and reagents, presenting additional challenges.
In an effort to increase the diagnostic capacity for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the UK, the Francis Crick Institute, a biomedical research institute based in London, rapidly repurposed its staff and facilities in late March 2020 to serve as a clinical diagnostic testing facility through a partnership between a major local healthcare provider (University College London Hospitals National Health Services Trust) and an accredited clinical diagnostic laboratory (Health Services Laboratories, HSL), termed the CRICK COVID-19 Consortium (CCC)5. The pipeline utilises a series of in-house buffers to first inactivate patient samples received from care homes and hospitals, and to then extract RNA before using a CE marked commercial kit to detect SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR. Patient results are reported through a custom online web portal that interfaces with the reference laboratory5. In order to avoid dependence on any singular testing methodology, to continue increasing testing capacity, and to provide a potential means to deliver diagnostics at the point-of-care, the CCC was also tasked with developing and validating alternative SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies.
Herein, we describe the use of loop mediated isothermal amplification PCR coupled with reverse transcription (RT-LAMP) as a robust method for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical specimens6. The entire strand displacement and amplification procedure is carried out at a single temperature in less than 30 minutes, alleviating the need for a thermocycler qPCR system. Diagnostic tests utilising this technique have been developed for RNA viruses and other pathogens7–9, and there are now several preprints focusing on the use of RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-210–13. We set up a SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP assay using the WarmStart Colorimetric LAMP 2X Mastermix commercialised by New England Biolabs (NEB), which allows for visual assessment of DNA amplification. Alternatively, DNA amplification can be quantified on a real-time PCR machine by complexing the reaction with the DNA dye SYTO 910. We made use of primers developed by Zhang et al. targeting the nucleocapsid phosphoprotein (N gene) of SARS-CoV-210 and, in a parallel reaction, primers that detect human 18S rRNA to control for specimen quality9.
Our results demonstrate that within the CCC pipeline, RT-LAMP can readily replace RT-qPCR as a means for detecting SARS-CoV-2 transcripts within RNA extracted from nose-throat swabs and endotracheal secretions/bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. RT-LAMP for the N gene shows absence of non-specific amplification and cross-reactivity with other human coronaviruses or respiratory viruses, and displays a sensitivity threshold almost equivalent to the gold standard RT-qPCR. Switching to RT-LAMP translates into a ten-fold decrease in total reagent cost and a potential four-fold increase in pipeline output. Additionally, we provide preliminary data suggesting that RT-LAMP can be performed without prior RNA extraction, allowing rapid and cost-effective testing that could potentially be extended to point-of-care. The entire workflow was validated under extended governance by public health authorities during the pandemic and inspected by a qualified UKAS assessor against GenQA guidelines to verify compliance to ISO 15189:2012 equivalent standard (US equiv. CAP/CLIA). As such, the standard operating procedure (SOP) developed here is ready to be deployed for diagnostic testing of SARS-CoV-2.
Material and Methods
CCC Pipeline Procedures and HSL RT-qPCR
All the samples processing through the CCC pipeline was done in accordance with SOPs described recently5. A redefined reaction, running, and reporting SOP can be found in the Supplemental Methods.
RT-LAMP Assay
RT-LAMP reaction was performed in a total volume of 15 µL, mixing 7.5 µL WarmStart Colorimetric LAMP 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs, M1800), 1.5 µL of 10X primer mix, 1.5 µL SYTO 9 Green Fluorescent Nucleic Acid Stain (ThermoFisher Scientific, S34854), 1.5 µL of Nuclease-free water (Ambion, AM9932) and 3 µL of sample unless stated otherwise. 10X SYTO 9 solution at 5 µM in nuclease free water was prepared for a final concentration of 0.5 µM in the final RT-LAMP reaction. 10X primer mix was prepared from 100 µM desalted DNA primers obtained from Sigma Custom Oligos Service. 10X primer mixes for N gene and 18S contained FIP and BIP primers at 16 µM, F3 and B3 at 2 µM, LF and LB at 4 µM. RT-LAMP was ran following a Standard Operating Procedure (cf. Appendix) on a 7500, 7500 Fast, QuantStudio 3, 5, or 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). A negative no template control (NTC) and a positive control (supplied by HSL, SARS-CoV-2 clinical sample) were included on every run. Experiments utilising laboratory grown SARS-CoV-2 were performed in containment level 3 at the Francis Crick Institute (FCI) by trained personnel according to health and safety guidelines.
We found that the assembled reaction mix was unstable when kept at 4°C for more than a few hours, and sensitive to freeze-thaw when kept at −20°C for more than a day. The RT-LAMP should be performed using freshly prepared reaction mix. The individual components should be stored at −20°C until use and avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles.
Accreditation and Governance
As outlined recently5, the CCC was formed in partnership with HSL, a UCLH UKAS accredited lab, who already had a COVID-19 RT-qPCR test in scope. All samples were received and communicated by HSL under their accreditation and the CCC RT-LAMP assay was validated against their existing RT-qPCR test and the CCC’s validated RT-qPCR test, which uses a CE marked commercial kit (BGI). Given the urgent timeframe required to implement testing, it was not possible to secure official clinical laboratory accreditation for the Francis Crick Institute. However, full measures were taken to ensure that the CCC RT-LAMP test was evaluated, verified and performed for diagnostic use in an environment that adhered to equivalent international standards (ISO 15189:2012, US equiv. CAP/CLIA), overseen and audited by HSL. These measures were implemented under the advice and oversight of registered professionals from existing nearby ISO accredited medical laboratories, and included writing and following clinical diagnostic SOPs for every stage of the pipeline from sample reception, processing to result reporting by qualified clinical scientists prior to results being communicated to patients by HSL. Additional SOPs were followed for sample storage, disposal of materials, batch certification of reagents and incident reporting. Appropriate risk assessments, training and competency assessment procedures were established and documented. Record sheets were created to document the receipt, batch acceptance testing, and start/end of use dates for key reagents and consumables. An inventory of all key equipment was compiled which, where appropriate, included details of service and calibration records. Systems were also established for the control of all key documents (version implementation, distribution and acknowledgement), audit trailing (what samples were tested when, by whom, with what equipment and using which consumable/reagent batches), and the recording of all untoward incidents/issues (thus facilitating appropriate investigation, rectification and recurrence prevention). Samples were barcoded and tracked using the Crick Clarity library information management system (LIMS). All key documents are available at https://www.crick.ac.uk/research/covid-19/covid19-consortium. NHS governance was extended by a specific memorandum of understanding for diagnostic testing between UCLH and the Francis Crick Institute enabled by NHS England. Assurance of the pipeline was performed in collaboration with GenQA, following their checklist for non-accredited laboratories and the lab and CCC workflow were inspected by a qualified UKAS assessor against the GenQA guidelines to verify compliance to IS015189:2012 equivalent standard.
Results
RT-LAMP test validity
RT-LAMP was performed with 3 µL of RNA in a total reaction volume of 15 µL unless stated otherwise. Each sample was tested in two separate reactions, one with primers targeting the N gene of SARS-CoV-2, and the second targeting human 18S rRNA to control for specimen integrity and quality (Figure 1A). The RT-LAMP mastermix contains a colorimetric pH indicator that turns from pink to yellow upon DNA amplification (Figure 1B). In addition, we benchmarked the RT-LAMP method by measuring DNA amplification using a SYBR based dye in a real-time PCR machine. When measuring fluorescence every minute (‘cycle’), double stranded DNA accumulation follows a characteristic exponential amplification phase that eventually plateaus (Figure 1C and 1D).
An initial characterization of the technique was performed using 24 RNA samples purified from patient nasopharyngeal swabs, 12 of which were positive for SARS-CoV-2 as assessed by the CCC pipeline via RT-qPCR5. RT-LAMP could detect SARS-CoV-2 in the 12 positive samples with no amplification detected in all 12 negative samples, displaying 100% concordance to our current clinical diagnostic platform (Figures 1C and 1E). Internal control signal was detected in all samples (Figure 1D).
RT-LAMP background noise and specificity
The background signal of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP assay was assessed by running RNA elution buffer (7 samples) or nuclease free water (7 samples) no template controls (NTCs) performed 4 separate times by 4 different operators. Non-specific signal could be detected in one well of one experiment after 25 minutes (Figure 2A). A similar experiment was performed for the 18S rRNA internal control RT-LAMP assay and revealed signal in NTCs after 20 minutes (Figure 2B). Based on these NTC data, a detection threshold was set for each RT-LAMP assay which eliminated all false positives in the N gene RT-LAMP assay and 21 of 23 false positives in the 18S rRNA RT-LAMP assay (Figure 2C). This translated to a maximum run time for each reaction: 25 minutes for N gene and 20 minutes for 18S (Figure 1C). Implementing these criteria in a separate experiment yielded no false positives from 47 NTCs in the SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP protocol and 4.5% false positives in the 18S rRNA RT-LAMP assay (all with a time threshold > 19) (Figure 2D-E). We then asked if melting curves obtained from thermocycler runs could be used to help discriminate true positives from false positives. N gene and 18S rRNA RT-LAMP reactions each gave single peaks in melt curve plots (Figure S1A) and consistent melting temperature values (Figure S1B) over multiple experiments performed on positive and negative patient samples. Moreover, positive samples that amplified near the assay endpoint (i.e., high time threshold) still displayed a clear melting curve peak consistent with being true positives (Figure S2A) and were distinguishable from false positives (Figure S2B). Therefore, when implementing the assay using a real-time PCR machine (thermocycler) with SYBR-based detection, incorporation of a traditional melting curve stage allows for elimination of false positives and increases reporting confidence for SARS-CoV-2 positive samples (see Supplemental Methods).
To further assess the specificity of the N gene RT-LAMP assay we first determined possible cross-reactivity with human RNA. 95 wells of RNA from a human cell line extracted by the CCC pipeline gave no signal in the assay (Figure 3A). To assess the assay’s specificity for SARS-CoV-2, the RT-LAMP assay was performed on RNA purified from clinical samples from COVID-19 negative patients infected with a variety of RNA viruses, including seasonal coronaviruses strains 229E, NL63, OC43 and HKU1, MERS-CoV, Influenza A and B viruses, metapneumovirus (MPV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) or parainfluenza viruses type 3 and 4 (PIV3, PIV4). All samples gave a signal in the 18S rRNA RT-LAMP, confirming the presence of human RNA (Figure 3B). With the N gene RT-LAMP, no signal was observed with any of the 14 distinct virus containing specimens tested, confirming that the assay is highly specific for SARS-CoV-2 (Figure 3B).
RT-LAMP sensitivity and precision
In order to ascertain the sensitivity of the N gene RT-LAMP assay, RNA from a SARS-CoV-2 quantified gene copy number standard obtained from the UK National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) was extracted and assessed by limiting dilution. The results indicate that the limit of reliable detection of the N gene RT-LAMP assay is between 500-1000 copies of N gene (Figure 4A-B). This was confirmed using 10-fold serial dilutions of RNA extracted from laboratory-grown SARS-CoV-2 quantified using the NIBSC standard (Figure 4C). Notably, a highly linear response was observed, even in the presence of 1% Triton-X 100, which has been proposed as a means of inactivating SARS-CoV-214.
The RT-LAMP assay reproducibility and precision were determined by extracting RNA 5 times from a confirmed COVID-19 positive patient sample through the CCC pipeline and assessing by N gene and 18S RT-LAMP in 5 independent experiments, performed by two different operators (Figure 4D). The coefficient of variation was 0.03151 for the N gene RT-LAMP analysis and 0.03595 for the 18S rRNA internal control. We also verified that RT-LAMP can be performed in a 384-well plate format using a QuantStudio 5 real-time PCR machine with equivalent results (Figure S3).
Clinical validation of RT-LAMP against two clinical diagnostic RT-qPCR assays
The RT-LAMP assay was benchmarked against the RT-qPCR methods used by the reference clinical diagnostic laboratory, HSL, and that used by the CCC validated clinical diagnostic platform by assessing 37 clinical samples processed in parallel by both laboratories with duplicate RT-qPCR analyses. RNA extracted by the CCC pipeline was then tested by RT-LAMP in duplicate runs. RT-LAMP detected 16 positives in both experiments, which was 100% concordant with results obtained by the CCC’s RT-qPCR assay using a CE marked kit from BGI and HSL’s N gene RT-qPCR assay. However, positives with Ct > 35 near the limit of detection (Ct = 37) of the BGI RT-qPCR assay, which were termed ‘borderline positives’, were not consistently detected by the N gene RT-LAMP assay (Figure 5A), despite those samples displaying clear signal for 18S rRNA amplification (data not shown). In an additional set of experiments, 71 clinical specimens in viral transport medium (VTM) stored at HSL were subjected to RNA extraction through the CCC pipeline and examined by HSL’s RT-qPCR and CCC’s RT-LAMP assay in duplicate (Figure 5B). Again, samples with Ct < 39 in the HSL RT-qPCR analysis (which runs for 45 cycles as opposed to 40 in the BGI assay) were confidently detected by RT-LAMP, whilst samples with Ct values near the limit of detection (39 < Ct < 41), indicating very low levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, displayed inconsistent amplification by N gene RT-LAMP despite showing signal for 18S rRNA RT-LAMP amplification (data not shown). Altogether, these data demonstrate that RT-LAMP performed on extracted RNA accurately detects SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples as verified by a clinical diagnostic laboratory and a validated clinical diagnostic pipeline. However, samples with Ct values within two cycles of the limit of detection of either RT-qPCR assays, were not consistently identified in duplicate RT-LAMP runs, with detection for some samples in one run, but not always in the other. These results suggest that RT-LAMP is slightly less sensitive than RT-qPCR when performed with extracted RNA. However, it is important to bear in mind that the RT-LAMP assay was performed during these validation experiments with a third of the input RNA used by either RT-qPCR methods during these validation experiments (3 µL versus 10 µL), partly due to limitations in sample availability. Although not examined here, recent studies have proposed that the addition of guanidine containing compounds in millimolar amounts can improve the detection sensitivity of the RT-LAMP assay11,15.
Bypassing RNA extraction
Lastly, we asked if RT-LAMP could be performed on dry swabs without the need for RNA extraction. Recent work shows that 0.5% Triton X-100 inactivates SARS-CoV-214, and we observed that performing RT-LAMP with samples diluted in 1% Triton X-100 does not affect the sensitivity of the assay (Figure 4C). We reverse-engineered swab specimens by coating hospital-grade swabs in serial dilutions with HEK293T cell supernatant of SARS-CoV-2 crude suspension generated in the laboratory. Swabs were left to dry overnight, and placed in 0.5% Triton X-100 for 15-30 minutes at room temperature before assessment. The RT-LAMP test used 4.5 µL of the solubilised material to maximise the sensitivity of the assay (Figure 6). In parallel, samples were processed by the CCC pipeline and interrogated by RT-qPCR with a calculated equivalent amount of RNA. ‘RT-LAMP Pre’ (without RNA purification) results were 94% concordant to those generated by the CCC pipeline using RT-qPCR, suggesting that RT-LAMP may potentially be performed without traditional RNA extraction. However, the use of RT-LAMP on material from swabs without RNA extraction requires clinical validation using bona fide nasopharyngeal specimens to ascertain reliability and compatibility with various transport media.
Discussion
Rapid and reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 is required to efficiently diagnose infected individuals and to provide governments and health systems with guidance for treatment and quarantine strategies to reduce the risk of transmission. The CCC was formed to address a critical testing shortage in the London area, especially for frontline healthcare workers, with the additional goal of rapidly validating and disseminating SOPs for others to scale up their own diagnostic programs. The majority of testing is currently performed by RT-qPCR amplification of viral RNA obtained from nasopharyngeal samples. In the face of continued global demand and competition for reagents and resources and to minimise reliance on any singular testing strategy, we have outlined here procedures to utilise RT-LAMP as a cost-effective and high throughput alternative to RT-qPCR for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in clinical specimens.
Implementing this testing method would reduce the CCC’s operational costs ten-fold when accounting for all consumables (data not shown), provide the ability to scale up our output further (Figure S3), and decrease reporting turnaround time in comparison to our current method. We confirmed that the assay is highly specific for SARS-CoV-2 and displays lack of cross-reactivity with other respiratory viruses, including seasonal coronaviruses. Assay accuracy and robustness is denoted by an absence of false positives and the further introduction of a melt curve stage allows increased confidence in the identification and reporting of genuine positives. When performed with extracted RNA, the N gene RT-LAMP assay displays a sensitivity comparable to clinically approved RT-qPCR methods. Additionally, preliminary experiments demonstrate that RT-LAMP can be performed directly without RNA extraction, by inactivating virus-containing dry swabs in a detergent-based solution. However, these experiments did not make use of true nasopharyngeal swabs that are likely to contain material that can cause RNA degradation or inhibit the assay (unpublished observations).
Our methodology makes use of a real-time qPCR machine that measures DNA amplification using a SYBR based dye, allowing for real-time detection and standardised reporting. We did not test extensively if RT-LAMP could be assessed by the colorimetric indicator alone, although some of our data suggests that the colour change readout is concordant with the SYTO 9 dye results (Figures 1, 3 and 4). If RT-LAMP were coupled with a colorimetric read-out and the need for RNA extraction could be obviated, the result would be a testing modality that tremendously reduces the cost and time for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics and allow its application at point-of-care and in remote areas where sophisticated testing infrastructures currently do not exist.
Data Availability
All key documents are available at https://www.crick.ac.uk/research/covid-19/covid19-consortium
https://www.crick.ac.uk/research/covid-19/covid19-consortium
The Crick COVID-19 Consortium (CCC)
Jim Aitken1, Zoe Allen2, Rachel Ambler1, Karen Ambrose1, Emma Ashton2, Alida Avola1, Samutheswari Balakrishnan1, Caitlin Barns-Jenkins1, Genevieve Barr1, Sam Barrell1, Souradeep Basu1, Rupert Beale1,3, Clare Beesley2, Nisha Bhardwaj1, Shahnaz Bibi2, Ganka Bineva-Todd1, Dhruva Biswas3, Michael J. Blackman1,4, Dominique Bonnet1, Faye Bowker1, Malgorzata Broncel1, Claire Brooks2, Michael D. Buck1, Andrew Buckton2, Timothy Budd1, Alana Burrell1, Louise Busby2, Claudio Bussi1, Simon Butterworth1, Fiona Byrne1, Richard Byrne1, Simon Caidan1, Joanna Campbell5, Johnathan Canton1, Ana Cardoso1, Nick Carter1, Luiz Carvalho1, Raffaella Carzaniga1, Natalie Chandler2, Qu Chen1, Peter Cherepanov1, Laura Churchward6, Graham Clark1, Bobbi Clayton1, Clementina Cobolli Gigli1, Zena Collins1, Sally Cottrell2, Margaret Crawford1, Laura Cubitt1, Tom Cullup2, Heledd Davies1, Patrick Davis1, Dara Davison1, Vicky Dearing1, Solene Debaisieux1, Monica Diaz-Romero1, Alison Dibbs1, Jessica Diring1, Paul C. Driscoll1, Annalisa D’Avola1, Christopher Earl1, Amelia Edwards1, Chris Ekin7, Dimitrios Evangelopoulos1,3, Rupert Faraway1,3, Antony Fearns1, Aaron Ferron1, Efthymios Fidanis1 Dan Fitz1, James Fleming1, Bruno Frederico1, Alessandra Gaiba1, Anthony Gait2, Steve Gamblin1, Sonia Gandhi1,3,6, Liam Gaul1, Helen M. Golding1, Jacki Goldman1, Robert Goldstone1, Belen Gomez Dominguez2, Hui Gong1, Paul R. Grant 7, Maria Greco1, Mariana Grobler2, Anabel Guedan1, Maximiliano G. Gutierrez1, Fiona Hackett1, Ross Hall1, Steinar Halldorsson1, Suzanne Harris1, Sugera Hashim2, Lyn Healy1, Judith Heaney6, Susanne Herbst1, Graeme Hewitt1, Theresa Higgins1, Steve Hindmarsh1, Rajnika Hirani1, Joshua Hope1, Elizabeth Horton1, Beth Hoskins2, Catherine F. Houlihan6, Michael Howell1, Louise Howitt1, Jacqueline Hoyle2, Mint R. Htun1, Michael Hubank8,9, Hector Huerga Encabo1, Deborah Hughes8, Jane Hughes1, Almaz Huseynova1, Ming-Shih Hwang1, Rachael Instrell1, Deborah Jackson1, Mariam Jamal-Hanjani 3,6, Lucy Jenkins2, Ming Jiang1, Mark Johnson1, Leigh Jones1, Nnennaya Kanu3, George Kassiotis1, Louise Kiely2, Anastacio King Spert Teixeira1, Stuart Kirk7, Svend Kjaer1, Ellen Knuepfer1,12, Nikita Komarov1,3, Paul Kotzampaltiris5, Konstantinos Kousis1, Tammy Krylova1, Ania Kucharska1, Robyn Labrum5, Catherine Lambe1, Michelle Lappin1, Stacey-Ann Lee1, Andrew Levett 7, Lisa Levett 7, Marcel Levi6, Hon Wing Liu1, Sam Loughlin2, Wei-Ting Lu1, James I. MacRae1, Akshay Madoo1, Julie A. Marczak1, Mimmi Martensson1, Thomas Martinez1, Bishara Marzook1, John Matthews7, Joachim M. Matz1, Samuel McCall5, Laura E. McCoy3, Fiona McKay2, Edel C. McNamara1, Carlos M. Minutti1, Gita Mistry1, Miriam Molina-Arcas1, Beatriz Montaner1, Kylie Montgomery2, Catherine Moore10, David Moore3,6, Anastasia Moraiti1, Lucia Moreira-Teixeira1, Joyita Mukherjee1, Cristina Naceur-Lombardelli3, Eleni Nastouli 6,11, Aileen Nelson1, Jerome Nicod1, Luke Nightingale1, Stephanie Nofal1, Paul Nurse1, Savita Nutan2, Caroline Oedekoven1, Anne O’Garra1, Jean D. O’Leary1, Jessica Olsen1, Olga O’Neill1, Nicola O’Reilly1, Paula Ordonez Suarez1, Neil Osborne1, Amar Pabari7, Aleksandra Pajak1, Venizelos Papayannopoulos1, Namita Patel1, Yogen Patel5, Oana Paun1, Nigel Peat1, Laura Peces-Barba Castano1, Ana Perez Caballero2, Jimena Perez-Lloret1, Magali S. Perrault1, Abigail Perrin1, Roy Poh5, Enzo Z. Poirier1, James M. Polke5, Marc Pollitt1, Lucia Prieto-Godino1, Alize Proust1, Clinda Puvirajasinghe2, Christophe Queval1, Vijaya Ramachandran2, Abhinay Ramaprasad1, Peter Ratcliffe1, Laura Reed2, Caetano Reis e Sousa1, Kayleigh Richardson1, Sophie Ridewood1, Fiona Roberts1, Rowenna Roberts2, Angela Rodgers1, Pablo Romero Clavijo1, Annachiara Rosa1, Alice Rossi1, Chloe Roustan1, Andrew Rowan1, Erik Sahai1, Aaron Sait1, Katarzyna Sala1, Theo Sanderson1, Pierre Santucci1, Fatima Sardar1, Adam Sateriale1, Jill A. Saunders1, Chelsea Sawyer1, Anja Schlott1, Edina Schweighoffer1, Sandra Segura-Bayona1, Rajvee Shah Punatar1, Joe Shaw2, Gee Yen Shin6,7, Mariana Silva Dos Santos1, Margaux Silvestre1, Matthew Singer1, Daniel M. Snell1, Ok-Ryul Song 1, Moira J. Spyer 3, Louisa Steel2, Amy Strange1, Adrienne E. Sullivan1, Charles Swanton1,3,6, Michele S.Y. Tan1, Zoe H. Tautz-Davis1, Effie Taylor1, Gunes Taylor1, Harriet B. Taylor1, Alison Taylor-Beadling2, Fernanda Teixeira Subtil1, Berta Terré Torras1, Patrick Toolan-Kerr1,3, Francesca Torelli1, Tea Toteva1, Moritz Treeck1, Hadija Trojer13, Ming-Han C. Tsai1, James M.A.Turner1, Melanie Turner 7, Jernej Ule1,3, Rachel Ulferts1, Sharon P. Vanloo1,3, Selvaraju Veeriah3, Subramanian Venkatesan1, Karen Vousden1, Andreas Wack1, Claire Walder2, Philip A. Walker1, Yiran Wang1, Sophia Ward1,3, Catharina Wenman2, Luke Williams1, Matthew J. Williams1, Wai Keong Wong6, Joshua Wright1, Mary Wu1, Lauren Wynne1, Zheng Xiang1, Melvyn Yap1, Julian A. Zagalak1,3, Davide Zecchin1,11 and Rachel Zillwood1
1The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK
2Great Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK.
3University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
4London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
5National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BG, UK
6University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK
7Health Services Laboratories, London WC1H 9AX, UK
8The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK
9The Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
10Public Health Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK
11University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK 12Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London NW1 0TU, UK
13Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK
CAPTURE study
Nicky Browne1, Kim Edmonds1, Yasir Khan1, Sarah Sarker1, Ben Shum1, Tim Slattery1, & Samra Turajlic1,2
1The Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
2The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK
Conflicts of interest
D. Miller and K. Gulati are employees of New England Biolabs, which provided the WarmStart Colorimetric LAMP 2X Master Mix used in this work. C. Swanton receives or has received grant support from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Roche-Ventana, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Ono Pharmaceutical and has consulted for or received an honorarium from Pfizer, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, BMS, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Illumina, Genentech, Roche-Venatana, GRAIL, Medicxi, and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute. C. Swanton also is a shareholder of Apogen Biotechnologies, Epic Bioscience, and GRAIL and has stock options in and is a cofounder of Achilles Therapeutics.
Supplementary Figure Legends
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by The Rosetrees Trust and The John Black Charitable Foundation, as well as the Francis Crick Institute, which receives its funding from the UK Research Medical Council (FC001169, FC001078), Cancer Research UK (FC001169, FC001078) and the Wellcome Trust (FC001169, FC001078). E. Nastouli is funded by MRC, NIHR, GSK and H2020. S. Gandhi has an MRC Senior Clinical Fellowship. E.Z. Poirier and M.D. Buck are supported by EMBO Long-Term Fellowships (ALTF 536-2108 and ALTF 1096-2018) and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (832511 and 837951).
The authors wish to thank all of the CCC members and CAPTURE study members that have helped contribute reagents, advice, and time to this work.